Vera Montecinos Paulina, Pacheco Jorge, Guinez-Molinos Sergio, Piedra Daily, Velozo Lorena, Fuentes Andrés, Carmona Marcela, Landabur Alejandra, Suárez Pamela, Leighton Paulina
Servicio de Salud del Maule Talca Chile Servicio de Salud del Maule, Talca, Chile.
Departamento de Estadísticas e Información de Salud División de Planificación Sanitaria Subsecretaría de Salud Pública, Ministerio de Salud Santiago Chile Departamento de Estadísticas e Información de Salud, División de Planificación Sanitaria, Subsecretaría de Salud Pública, Ministerio de Salud, Santiago, Chile.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 May 8;49:e50. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.50. eCollection 2025.
To evaluate the usability of the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11) and its concordance and comparability with ICD-10, the version in use. ICD-11 introduces greater granularity than ICD-10, is designed for digital environments, and offers improvements over the previous version.
Two thousand medical death certificates for year 2020 were selected by proportional stratified sampling. Two expert coders and a gold standard team coded the records using the official ICD-11 tool. Concordance between gold standard and expert coders was assessed for immediate, underlying, and principal cause of death. Distribution by chapter was compared for ICD-11, ICD-10 in the original database, and ICD-10 mapped from ICD-11.
Concordance with clinical accuracy ranged from 37% for principal cause of death to 76% for immediate cause. Agreement on base codes ranged from 73% for principal cause to 86% for immediate and underlying causes. Cohen's kappa for principal cause was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.64 - 0.72) for coder 1 and 0.76 (95%CI: 0.73 - 0.80) for coder 2, which is considered significant concordance. The distribution of principal cause for ICD-10 and for ICD-10 mapped from ICD-11 was similar.
There is adequate concordance and comparability between ICD-11 and ICD-10. The tool has high usability, which confirms the feasibility of ICD-11 implementation in Chile, and underlines the need for continuous training and technological improvement.
评估《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD - 11)的可用性及其与现行版本ICD - 10的一致性和可比性。ICD - 11比ICD - 10具有更高的粒度,专为数字环境设计,并且在先前版本的基础上有所改进。
通过按比例分层抽样选取了2020年的2000份医学死亡证明。两名专家编码员和一个金标准团队使用官方ICD - 11工具对记录进行编码。评估金标准与专家编码员在死亡的直接原因、根本原因和主要原因方面的一致性。比较了ICD - 11、原始数据库中的ICD - 10以及从ICD - 11映射而来的ICD - 10按章节的分布情况。
与临床准确性的一致性范围从主要死因的37%到直接死因的76%。基础编码的一致性范围从主要死因的73%到直接和根本死因的86%。编码员1对主要死因的Cohen's kappa为0.68(95%CI:0.64 - 0.72),编码员2为0.76(95%CI:0.73 - 0.80),这被认为是显著的一致性。ICD - 10以及从ICD - 11映射而来的ICD - 10的主要死因分布相似。
ICD - 11与ICD - 10之间具有足够的一致性和可比性。该工具具有较高的可用性,这证实了在智利实施ICD - 11的可行性,并强调了持续培训和技术改进的必要性。