Salmonsen Christopher Blom, Lange Kai Henrik Wiborg, Kleif Jakob, Krøijer Rasmus, Bruun Lea, Mikalonis Martynas, Dalsgaard Peter, Hesseldal Karen Busk, Olsson Jon Emil Philip, Bertelsen Claus Anders
Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.
Graduate School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11777-3.
Transversus abdominis plane blocks are widely used, but the association between the cutaneous sensory block area and the analgesic effect is still debated. We aimed to determine the relationship between the cutaneous sensory block area, the surgical incision's location, and the block's analgesic efficacy.
A sensitivity analysis of data from a multicentre, patient-, clinician-, investigator-blinded, placebo- and active-controlled, 3-arm randomised clinical trial. Patients undergoing minimally invasive colon surgery were included from four hospitals across Denmark between January 2021 and February 2024. In this sensitivity analysis, we used our previously collected data of the cutaneous sensory block area to examine the efficacy of two different approaches to the transversus abdominis plane block, as compared to each other and placebo based on incision location. The primary outcome was total morphine dose equivalents administered in the first 24 h after minimally invasive surgery in patients receiving either a Pfannenstiel or a supraumbilical transverse incision.
We found that the subcostal dual laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block was superior to both the ultrasound-guided posterior transversus abdominis plane block and placebo in patients with a Pfannenstiel incision with an absolute difference of - 8.9 mg (95% CI, - 16.5 to - 1.3 mg; p = 0.02) and - 10.3 mg (95% CI, - 17.0 to - 3.6 mg; p < 0.01) morphine dose equivalents, respectively. No difference was found for the supraumbilical transverse incision. Patient-reported outcome measures favoured the laparoscopic-assisted block, with an absolute difference of 13 (95% CI, 1.7-24.3; p = 0.025) in the Quality of Recovery-15 score compared to placebo.
The effect of the transversus abdominis plane block seems to be independent of the distribution of the cutaneous sensory block area of the approach. The laparoscopic-assisted subcostal transversus abdominis plane block reduced postoperative pain with a high QoR-15 score.
腹横肌平面阻滞被广泛应用,但皮肤感觉阻滞区域与镇痛效果之间的关联仍存在争议。我们旨在确定皮肤感觉阻滞区域、手术切口位置与阻滞镇痛效果之间的关系。
对一项多中心、患者、临床医生和研究者三盲、安慰剂对照和活性对照的三臂随机临床试验的数据进行敏感性分析。纳入2021年1月至2024年2月期间来自丹麦四家医院接受微创结肠手术的患者。在这项敏感性分析中,我们使用之前收集的皮肤感觉阻滞区域数据,根据切口位置,比较两种不同腹横肌平面阻滞方法相互之间以及与安慰剂相比的疗效。主要结局是接受耻骨上横切口或脐上横切口的患者在微创手术后24小时内给予的吗啡总剂量当量。
我们发现,对于耻骨上横切口的患者,肋下双腹腔镜辅助腹横肌平面阻滞优于超声引导下后路腹横肌平面阻滞和安慰剂,吗啡剂量当量的绝对差异分别为-8.9mg(95%CI,-16.5至-1.3mg;p=0.02)和-10.3mg(95%CI,-17.0至-3.6mg;p<0.01)。脐上横切口未发现差异。患者报告的结局指标支持腹腔镜辅助阻滞,与安慰剂相比,恢复质量-15评分的绝对差异为13(95%CI,1.7-24.3;p=0.025)。
腹横肌平面阻滞的效果似乎与该方法的皮肤感觉阻滞区域分布无关。腹腔镜辅助肋下腹横肌平面阻滞可减轻术后疼痛,恢复质量-15评分较高。