• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产科肛门括约肌损伤中的种族和民族差异:美国的横断面研究。

Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: cross-sectional study in the USA.

作者信息

Rajasingham M, Hossein-Pour P, D'Souza R, Geoffrion R, Ananth C V, Muraca G M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun;65(6):778-789. doi: 10.1002/uog.29231. Epub 2025 May 9.

DOI:10.1002/uog.29231
PMID:40344313
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Racial disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) are poorly understood; their investigation by parity, obstetric history and mode of delivery may provide insight into which individuals are at the greatest risk for OASI. We aimed to quantify the association of race and ethnicity with OASI, stratified by parity, obstetric history and mode of delivery. Secondary aims were to explore variations in OASI rates among racial subgroups and by immigration status (foreign-born vs USA-born).

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 12 501 183 vaginal births in the USA from January 2016 to December 2021 using birth-certificate data obtained from the National Vital Statistics System. Cox proportional hazard regression models were fitted, with gestational age as the timescale, to quantify the association of self-reported race and ethnicity with OASI, with adjustment for several confounders. The maternal race and ethnicity groups included: American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN), Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander, White and mixed race. Models were stratified by number of previous births and the occurrence of Cesarean delivery (CD) among prior births. This resulted in three groups: primiparous (i.e. only the index birth); multiparous without a previous CD; and multiparous with at least one previous CD. Within each stratum, we further grouped individuals by mode of delivery in the index birth, as spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), operative vaginal delivery (OVD) with forceps and OVD with vacuum.

RESULTS

In primiparous individuals who had a vaginal birth, the overall OASI rate was 2.2%, but it varied widely by mode of delivery (SVD, 1.7%; OVD with forceps, 14.8%; OVD with vacuum, 6.6%). Asian primiparae had higher OASI hazards compared with White primiparae, irrespective of mode of delivery (SVD: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.69 (95% CI, 1.64-1.73); OVD with forceps: aHR, 1.48 (95% CI, 1.38-1.58); OVD with vacuum: aHR, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.44-1.58)), while AIAN and Black primiparae had inconsistent associations with OASI rate depending on mode of delivery, when compared with White primiparae. In multiparous individuals without a previous CD, the rates of OASI were lower than those seen in primiparae (SVD, 0.5%; OVD with forceps, 7.5%; OVD with vacuum, 3.2%) and the association of race and ethnicity with OASI varied by mode of delivery for all race groups except Asian, in whom it was consistently associated with a 1.5-2.1-times higher hazard of OASI. Among multiparous individuals with a previous CD, overall OASI rates were similar to those seen in primiparae (SVD, 1.3%; OVD with forceps, 11.8%; OVD with vacuum, 5.1%). In this group, the only associations of race and ethnicity with OASI were higher hazards among Asian vs White individuals who had a SVD (aHR, 2.16 (95% CI, 1.97-2.36)) and an OVD with vacuum (aHR, 1.65 (95% CI, 1.39-1.96)). The rate of OASI varied widely between Asian race subgroups, with the highest rate noted among individuals with origins and/or ancestry from India (e.g. 27.2% among primiparae who had OVD with forceps) and the lowest in those from Japan (e.g. 9.3% among primiparae who had OVD with forceps). Across racial and ethnic minority groups, the OASI rate was higher among foreign-born vs USA-born residents; this trend was not observed among White individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic disparities in OASI persist regardless of parity, obstetric history and mode of delivery. Variations in the OASI rate are apparent within Asian racial subgroups and by immigration status. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)中的种族差异尚不清楚;按产次、产科病史和分娩方式对其进行调查,可能有助于了解哪些个体发生OASI的风险最高。我们旨在量化种族和民族与OASI之间的关联,并按产次、产科病史和分娩方式进行分层。次要目的是探讨不同种族亚组以及按移民身份(外国出生与美国出生)划分的OASI发生率差异。

方法

我们利用从国家生命统计系统获得的出生证明数据,对2016年1月至2021年12月在美国进行的12501183例阴道分娩进行了横断面研究。采用Cox比例风险回归模型,以孕周为时间尺度,量化自我报告的种族和民族与OASI之间的关联,并对多个混杂因素进行调整。孕产妇种族和民族分组包括:美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN)、亚洲人、黑人、西班牙裔、夏威夷原住民和其他太平洋岛民、白人以及混血儿。模型按既往分娩次数和既往分娩中剖宫产(CD)的发生情况进行分层。这产生了三组:初产妇(即仅本次分娩);既往无CD的经产妇;既往至少有一次CD的经产妇。在每个分层中,我们根据本次分娩的分娩方式进一步对个体进行分组,分为自然阴道分娩(SVD)、产钳助产阴道分娩(OVD)和真空助产阴道分娩(OVD)。

结果

在进行阴道分娩的初产妇中,OASI总体发生率为2.2%,但因分娩方式不同而有很大差异(SVD为1.7%;产钳助产OVD为14.8%;真空助产OVD为6.6%)。无论分娩方式如何,亚洲初产妇发生OASI的风险均高于白人初产妇(SVD:调整后风险比(aHR)为1.69(95%CI,1.64 - 1.73);产钳助产OVD:aHR为1.48(95%CI,1.38 - 1.58);真空助产OVD:aHR为1.51(95%CI,1.44 - 1.58)),而与白人初产妇相比,AIAN和黑人初产妇发生OASI的风险因分娩方式而异。在既往无CD的经产妇中,OASI发生率低于初产妇(SVD为0.5%;产钳助产OVD为7.5%;真空助产OVD为3.2%),除亚洲人外,所有种族组中种族和民族与OASI的关联因分娩方式而异,亚洲人发生OASI的风险始终高出1.5 - 2.1倍。在既往有CD的经产妇中,OASI总体发生率与初产妇相似(SVD为1.3%;产钳助产OVD为11.8%;真空助产OVD为5.1%)。在该组中,种族和民族与OASI的唯一关联为,进行SVD(aHR为2.16(95%CI,1.97 - 2.36))和真空助产OVD(aHR为1.65(95%CI,1.39 - 1.96))的亚洲人与白人相比,发生OASI的风险更高。亚洲种族亚组之间OASI发生率差异很大,印度裔和/或有印度血统的个体发生率最高(如产钳助产初产妇中为27.2%),日本裔个体发生率最低(如产钳助产初产妇中为9.3%)。在所有种族和少数民族群体中,外国出生居民的OASI发生率高于美国出生居民;白人个体中未观察到这一趋势。

结论

无论产次、产科病史和分娩方式如何,OASI中的种族和民族差异依然存在。亚洲种族亚组以及按移民身份划分的OASI发生率差异明显。© 2025作者。《妇产科超声》由约翰·威利父子有限公司代表国际妇产科超声学会出版。

相似文献

1
Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: cross-sectional study in the USA.产科肛门括约肌损伤中的种族和民族差异:美国的横断面研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun;65(6):778-789. doi: 10.1002/uog.29231. Epub 2025 May 9.
2
Variation in Episiotomy Use Among Nulliparous Individuals by Maternity Care Provider and Associated Rates of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.初产妇会阴切开术使用情况在不同产科护理提供者之间的差异及相关产科肛门括约肌损伤发生率
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 May;46(5):102415. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102415. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
3
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury among parous women.经产妇发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;303(3):709-714. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05806-w. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
4
Temporal trends in obstetric anal sphincter injury from the first vaginal delivery in Austria, Canada, Norway, and Sweden.奥地利、加拿大、挪威和瑞典首次阴道分娩中产科肛门括约肌损伤的时间趋势。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Nov;100(11):1969-1976. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14244. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
5
Predictive factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: systematic review and meta-analysis.初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;62(4):486-496. doi: 10.1002/uog.26292.
6
Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury increases with maternal age irrespective of parity: a population-based register study.产妇年龄与产科肛门括约肌损伤风险相关,与产次无关:基于人群的登记研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 15;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1473-7.
7
The prevention of perineal trauma during vaginal birth.阴道分娩时会阴创伤的预防。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S991-S1004. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.021. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
8
Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury in a Norwegian Region: a case-control study.挪威某地区产科肛门括约肌损伤的可改变和不可改变危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 1;22(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04621-2.
9
Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery.分娩时会阴损伤的危险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):255-60. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.547.
10
Is the older perineum a safer perineum? Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury.老年会阴是更安全的会阴吗?产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 May;190(2):693-699. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02358-5. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Guideline No. 457: Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS) Part I: Prevention, Recognition, and Immediate Management.第457号指南:产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS) 第一部分:预防、识别与即时处理
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 Dec;46(12):102719. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102719. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
2
Racial/Ethnic Impact on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Multicentric Retrospective Study.种族/族裔对产科肛门括约肌损伤的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan;36(1):101-106. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05966-2. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
3
Preterm Birth Risk and Maternal Nativity, Ethnicity, and Race.
早产风险与产妇出生地、民族和种族。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243194. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3194.
4
Maternal origin matters: Country of birth as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries.母源很重要:出生地是产科肛门括约肌损伤的一个危险因素。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Jul;166(1):426-434. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15427. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
5
Asian-White disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.产科肛门括约肌损伤的亚洲人与白人差异:系统评价与荟萃分析。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Dec 10;4(1):100296. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100296. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Use of race, ethnicity, and ancestry data in health research.种族、族裔和祖籍数据在健康研究中的应用。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;2(9):e0001060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001060. eCollection 2022.
7
Systemic And Structural Racism: Definitions, Examples, Health Damages, And Approaches To Dismantling.系统性和结构性种族主义:定义、示例、健康损害以及消除方法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Feb;41(2):171-178. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01394.
8
Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury among women who birth vaginally after a prior caesarean section: A state-wide cohort study.先前剖宫产术后行阴道分娩的妇女发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险:一项全州范围的队列研究。
BJOG. 2022 Jul;129(8):1325-1332. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17063. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
9
Obstetric anal sphincter injury by maternal origin and length of residence: a nationwide cohort study.产妇来源及居住时长与产科肛门括约肌损伤:一项全国性队列研究
BJOG. 2022 Feb;129(3):423-431. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16985. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
10
Updated Guidance on the Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals.医学与科学期刊中种族与民族报告的更新指南。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 17;326(7):621-627. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13304.