• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族/族裔对产科肛门括约肌损伤的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究

Racial/Ethnic Impact on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Multicentric Retrospective Study.

作者信息

La Verde Marco, Torella Marco, Fordellone Mario, Pace Luciana, Troìa Libera, Remorgida Valentino

机构信息

Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Medical Statistics Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan;36(1):101-106. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05966-2. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-024-05966-2
PMID:39495332
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs), third- and fourth-degree lacerations, represent a severe obstetric complication. Previous studies reported a higher incidence of OASIs in Asian women in non-Asian countries. This study was aimed at establishing a different OASIs prevalence among the racial/ethnic groups in Southern European centers.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study that included pregnant women who had vaginal singleton delivery between January 2019 and September 2022 in two Italian University hospitals, Naples and Novara, was conducted. We excluded cesarean sections, nonvertex presentation, preterm delivery, multiple pregnancies, congenital malformations, or stillbirths. Statistical analysis with an independent association of ethnicity to the risk of OASIs using clinical characteristics-adjusted multivariate logistic regression was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 3,049 pregnant women were included. 2.33% (71 patients) had an OASI. The median age was 31 years (IQR 7.00) and median gestational age was 39 weeks (IQR 1.40). Mean birth weight was 3,300 g (IQR 580.00). 1' and 5' Apgar scores were 9 and 9. The univariate logistic regression was not statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for baseline clinical characteristics showed an OR 2.540 (p value 0.01) for OASIs in Asian women. Primiparous and secondiparous were protective factors for OASIs with OR 0.224 (p value < 0.001) and OR 0.209 (p value 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm racial/ethnic disparities regarding OASIs, with an elevated risk for Asian women in Southern Europe. Prevention strategies and obstetric care in developed countries should be modulated to offset the risk of OASIs in this population. Additional research is needed to explain the specific mechanisms of these disparities.

摘要

引言与假设

产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIs),即三度和四度裂伤,是一种严重的产科并发症。以往研究报告称,在非亚洲国家的亚洲女性中,OASIs的发病率较高。本研究旨在确定南欧中心不同种族/族裔群体中OASIs的患病率。

方法

进行了一项多中心回顾性研究,纳入了2019年1月至2022年9月期间在那不勒斯和诺瓦拉的两家意大利大学医院进行单胎阴道分娩的孕妇。我们排除了剖宫产、非头位分娩、早产、多胎妊娠、先天性畸形或死产。使用临床特征调整的多变量逻辑回归对种族与OASIs风险的独立关联进行了统计分析。

结果

共纳入3049名孕妇。2.33%(71例患者)发生了OASI。中位年龄为31岁(四分位间距7.00),中位孕周为39周(四分位间距1.40)。平均出生体重为3300g(四分位间距580.00)。1分钟和5分钟阿氏评分分别为9分和9分。单变量逻辑回归无统计学意义。调整基线临床特征的多变量逻辑回归模型显示,亚洲女性发生OASIs的比值比为2.540(p值0.01)。初产妇和经产妇是OASIs的保护因素,比值比分别为0.224(p值<0.001)和0.209(p值0.01)。

结论

我们的结果证实了OASIs存在种族/族裔差异,南欧的亚洲女性风险较高。发达国家的预防策略和产科护理应进行调整,以抵消该人群发生OASIs的风险。需要进一步研究来解释这些差异的具体机制。

相似文献

1
Racial/Ethnic Impact on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Multicentric Retrospective Study.种族/族裔对产科肛门括约肌损伤的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan;36(1):101-106. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05966-2. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Maternal Ethnicity and the Risk of Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.产妇种族与产科肛门括约肌损伤风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Apr;43(4):469-473. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.08.016. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
3
Risk factors for perineal trauma in the primiparous population during non-operative vaginal delivery.初产妇非手术阴道分娩时会阴创伤的危险因素
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Mar;31(3):621-625. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03944-7. Epub 2019 May 2.
4
[Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines].[产科肛门括约肌损伤的定义、流行病学及危险因素:CNGOF产科会阴预防与保护指南]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Dec;46(12):913-921. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
What are the factors that may predict the severity of perineal tears in obstetric anal sphincter injuries and how are their outcomes? A 10-year retrospective analysis in a Southeast Asian population.哪些因素可能预测产科肛门括约肌损伤所致会阴撕裂的严重程度及其结局如何?一项东南亚人群的 10 年回顾性分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jun;33(6):1667-1674. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05164-y. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
6
Midterm complications after primary obstetrical anal sphincter injury repair in France.法国初次产科肛门括约肌损伤修复后的中期并发症。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06691-w.
7
Long-term anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury-does grade of tear matter?分娩性肛门括约肌损伤后长期肛门失禁-撕裂程度重要吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):232.e1-232.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.569. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
8
Severe Perineal Trauma in a Brazilian Southeastern Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.巴西东南部一所三级医院的严重会阴创伤:一项回顾性队列研究。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;27(2):e301-e305. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000910.
9
The Great Divide: Country of birth as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries.巨大差异:出生国家作为产科肛门括约肌损伤的一个风险因素
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Feb;58(1):79-85. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12672. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
10
Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population.预测现代产科人群中的产科肛门括约肌损伤
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):310.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.041. Epub 2016 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: cross-sectional study in the USA.产科肛门括约肌损伤中的种族和民族差异:美国的横断面研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun;65(6):778-789. doi: 10.1002/uog.29231. Epub 2025 May 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Asian-White disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.产科肛门括约肌损伤的亚洲人与白人差异:系统评价与荟萃分析。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Dec 10;4(1):100296. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100296. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
The incidence of wound complications following primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤一期修复术后伤口并发症发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 10.
3
Evidence-based labor management: second stage of labor (part 4).
循证分娩管理:第二产程(第 4 部分)。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Mar;4(2):100548. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100548. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
4
Obstetric anal sphincter injury by maternal origin and length of residence: a nationwide cohort study.产妇来源及居住时长与产科肛门括约肌损伤:一项全国性队列研究
BJOG. 2022 Feb;129(3):423-431. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16985. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
5
Evidence-based labor management: before labor (Part 1).循证分娩管理:分娩前(第 1 部分)。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Feb;2(1):100080. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100080. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
Evidence-based labor management: first stage of labor (part 3).循证分娩管理:第一产程(第 3 部分)。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Nov;2(4):100185. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100185. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
7
Evidence-based labor management: induction of labor (part 2).循证分娩管理:引产(第 2 部分)。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Aug;2(3):100136. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100136. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
8
Review of available national guidelines for obstetric anal sphincter injury.产科肛门括约肌损伤现有国家指南综述。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Nov;31(11):2247-2259. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04464-5. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
[Overview of logistic regression model analysis and application].[逻辑回归模型分析与应用概述]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 6;53(9):955-960. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.09.018.
10
Prospective comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injury incidence between an Asian and Western hospital.一家亚洲医院与一家西方医院产科肛门括约肌损伤发生率的前瞻性比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Mar;30(3):429-437. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3649-8. Epub 2018 Apr 13.