Banu S Amitha, Sharun Khan
Amrita Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Faridabad 121002, Haryana, India.
Center for Regenerative Nanomedicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States; Graduate Institute of Medicine, Yuan Ze University, 32003 Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Biomater Adv. 2025 Oct;175:214314. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214314. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is gaining significant attention in regenerative medicine, offering an abundance of growth factors and bioactive molecules that promote tissue repair and healing. In biomaterial research, PRP is often incorporated into scaffolds to enhance their bioactivity, facilitating cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation for improved tissue regeneration. However, inconsistencies in outcomes and variability across studies hinder its clinical translation. These challenges are primarily attributed to the lack of standardized reporting criteria for PRP characterization, which limits reproducibility and cross-study comparisons. Accurate characterization of PRP is essential for understanding its biological activity and therapeutic potential. Key parameters include platelet, white blood cell, and red blood cell concentrations. Recent classification systems, such as those proposed by the ISTH Subcommittee on Platelet Physiology, emphasize the importance of these parameters in categorizing PRP types. Establishing minimal reporting requirements helps address variability in PRP studies, ensuring consistency and transparency in the methodology and results. By adopting these standards as mandatory reporting requirements, researchers can reduce variability, enhance the credibility of their findings, and facilitate the development of standardized protocols for PRP-based therapies.
富血小板血浆(PRP)在再生医学领域正受到广泛关注,它含有大量促进组织修复和愈合的生长因子及生物活性分子。在生物材料研究中,PRP常被添加到支架中以增强其生物活性,促进细胞附着、增殖和分化,从而改善组织再生。然而,研究结果的不一致性以及不同研究之间的变异性阻碍了其临床转化。这些挑战主要归因于缺乏PRP特性的标准化报告标准,这限制了可重复性和跨研究比较。准确表征PRP对于理解其生物活性和治疗潜力至关重要。关键参数包括血小板、白细胞和红细胞浓度。最近的分类系统,如国际血栓与止血学会血小板生理学小组委员会提出的系统,强调了这些参数在PRP类型分类中的重要性。建立最低报告要求有助于解决PRP研究中的变异性问题,确保方法和结果的一致性和透明度。通过将这些标准作为强制性报告要求,研究人员可以减少变异性,提高研究结果的可信度,并促进基于PRP的治疗标准化方案的制定。