Suppr超能文献

肯尼亚西部提供者对避孕措施使用的限制。

Provider-imposed restrictions on contraceptive use in Western Kenya.

作者信息

Chung Stephanie, Bullington Brooke, Goland Emilia, Onyango Dickens O, Senderowicz Leigh, Mwanyiro Abigael, Rothschild Claire W, Wekesa Ben, Frizzelle Brian, Golub Ginger, Tumlinson Katherine

机构信息

Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Contraceptive Research, Developement and Introduction, Global Health and Population, FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.

Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2025 Aug;148:110937. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110937. Epub 2025 May 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Contraceptive providers unnecessarily restrict contraceptive use or inappropriately apply medical eligibility criteria for a variety of reasons, including knowledge gaps, personal bias, or fear of legal or social consequences. As prevalence of these restrictions is unknown, this analysis aims to document current patterns of provider-imposed restrictions on contraceptive methods at public facilities in Western Kenya and assess novel questions on medical restrictions.

STUDY DESIGN

We surveyed 345 family planning providers across all 137 public healthcare facilities in Kisumu County, Kenya in 2022. The survey asked about non-clinically-indicated provider restrictions placed on six contraceptive methods, including sociodemographic and medical restrictions on contraceptive use. We use descriptive statistics to present the self-reported proportion of providers who impose incorrect sociodemographic or medical restrictions and use Chi-squared tests to explore associations with provider gender, age, time since last family planning training, and facility level.

RESULTS

We find that providers commonly imposed sociodemographic restrictions on female permanent contraception and intrauterine devices, with fewer providers inappropriately restricting women seeking oral contraceptive pills, implants, injections, or male condoms. Few providers reported accurately applying weight, blood pressure, or breastfeeding related medical eligibility criteria, with many inappropriately restricting hormonal methods. Weight was the most common reason for restriction, with 50% of providers reportedly applying inappropriate weight-based restrictions to oral contraceptive pills, 60% to injectables, and 40% to implants.

CONCLUSIONS

Provider bias and inappropriate medical restrictions limit women's contraceptive choice in Kenya. More research is needed to address inappropriate provider restrictions, especially around patient age, weight, and partner consent.

IMPLICATIONS

We find that providers are applying biased and/or inappropriate medical restrictions to contraceptive methods in Kisumu, Kenya, especially around patient weight. More research is needed to understand why many providers are applying medical eligibility criteria incorrectly, and how this impacts women's contraceptive choices.

摘要

目的

由于知识差距、个人偏见或担心法律或社会后果等多种原因,避孕服务提供者会不必要地限制避孕措施的使用,或不适当地应用医学资格标准。由于这些限制的普遍程度尚不清楚,本分析旨在记录肯尼亚西部公共机构中提供者对避孕方法施加限制的当前模式,并评估有关医学限制的新问题。

研究设计

2022年,我们对肯尼亚基苏木县137家公共医疗保健机构的345名计划生育服务提供者进行了调查。该调查询问了对六种避孕方法的非临床指征性提供者限制,包括对避孕措施使用的社会人口统计学和医学限制。我们使用描述性统计来呈现自我报告的施加不正确社会人口统计学或医学限制的提供者比例,并使用卡方检验来探索与提供者性别、年龄、上次计划生育培训后的时间以及机构级别之间的关联。

结果

我们发现,提供者通常对女性永久性避孕和宫内节育器施加社会人口统计学限制,而不适当地限制寻求口服避孕药、植入剂、注射剂或男用避孕套的女性的提供者较少。很少有提供者报告准确应用与体重、血压或母乳喂养相关的医学资格标准,许多人不适当地限制了激素避孕方法。体重是最常见的限制原因,据报道,50%的提供者对口服避孕药、60%的提供者对注射剂、40%的提供者对植入剂施加了不适当的基于体重的限制。

结论

提供者的偏见和不适当的医学限制限制了肯尼亚女性的避孕选择。需要更多研究来解决不适当的提供者限制问题,特别是围绕患者年龄、体重和伴侣同意方面的问题。

启示

我们发现,肯尼亚基苏木的提供者对避孕方法施加了有偏见和/或不适当的医学限制,特别是在患者体重方面。需要更多研究来了解为什么许多提供者错误地应用医学资格标准,以及这如何影响女性的避孕选择。

相似文献

1
Provider-imposed restrictions on contraceptive use in Western Kenya.肯尼亚西部提供者对避孕措施使用的限制。
Contraception. 2025 Aug;148:110937. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110937. Epub 2025 May 7.
4
Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth.产后妇女避孕使用教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD001863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001863.
5
6
Theory-based interventions for contraception.基于理论的避孕干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 23;11(11):CD007249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007249.pub5.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验