Carroll Allison, Kapilashrami Anuj
School of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
School of Health & Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e036600. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036600.
Access to reproductive information and contraception (RIC) continues to be a critical unmet need in Tanzania and impedes the realisation of reproductive health rights. This study examined key sources of RIC and the factors influencing their uptake by women in Mbeya region of Tanzania.
This qualitative study was undertaken in a rural ward in a district in the south of the Mbeya region PARTICIPANTS: In-depth interviews were undertaken with 48 women users and 2 nurses working in a public health facility, and focus group discussions with 16 home-based care workers in the district. Participants were recruited through a local non-governmental organisation (NGO) in the region, and via snowball sampling. All interactions were recorded, translated and transcribed and sought to identify the available resources and barriers in using them.
Participants reported six main sources of reproductive information and contraceptives: public health facilities, NGO mobile clinics, other women, Mganga wa Asili (witchdoctors/traditional doctors) and Duka la Dawa (pharmacy). Women users and healthcare workers identified a range of individual (age, marital status and geography) and health system-wide factors shaping women's reproductive choices and preventing uptake of contraceptives. The study also revealed structural factors such as gender, ethnicity, indigeneity as key determinants of access and health seeking, placing women from Sukuma and Maasai communities is the most disadvantageous position. Historical social disadvantage, patriarchal social controls and the pressure to preserve sociocultural traditions that women experience in the Maasai and Sukuma tribes underpin their disconnect from mainstream services.
Women's reproductive choices and their uptake of contraceptives are shaped by the interaction of a range of individual, household, institutional and structural factors. An intersectional lens enables examination of the ways in which these factors interact and mutually constitute disadvantage and privilege.
获取生殖信息和避孕措施在坦桑尼亚仍然是一项关键的未得到满足的需求,并且阻碍了生殖健康权利的实现。本研究调查了坦桑尼亚姆贝亚地区生殖信息和避孕措施的主要来源以及影响妇女采用这些措施的因素。
这项定性研究在姆贝亚地区南部一个区的一个农村病房开展。
对48名女性使用者以及在一家公共卫生机构工作的2名护士进行了深入访谈,并与该地区16名居家护理工作者进行了焦点小组讨论。参与者通过该地区的一个当地非政府组织招募,并通过滚雪球抽样法选取。所有互动都进行了记录、翻译和转录,旨在确定可用资源以及使用这些资源的障碍。
参与者报告了生殖信息和避孕药具的六个主要来源:公共卫生机构、非政府组织流动诊所、其他女性、传统医生、巫医和药店。女性使用者和医护人员确定了一系列影响妇女生殖选择和阻碍采用避孕措施的个人因素(年龄、婚姻状况和地理位置)以及整个卫生系统的因素。该研究还揭示了诸如性别、种族、原住民身份等结构性因素是获取服务和寻求医疗的关键决定因素,使来自苏库马和马赛社区的妇女处于最不利的地位。历史社会劣势、父权社会控制以及马赛和苏库马部落妇女在维护社会文化传统方面所面临的压力,是她们与主流服务脱节的根源。
妇女的生殖选择及其对避孕措施的采用受到一系列个人、家庭、机构和结构性因素相互作用的影响。一个交叉性视角有助于审视这些因素相互作用并共同构成劣势和特权的方式。