• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻人和老年人在顺序规划中基于低概率的决策树启发式剪枝及概率折扣

Heuristic pruning of decision trees at low probabilities and probability discounting in sequential planning in young and older adults.

作者信息

Sass Sophia-Helen, Gönner Lorenz, Schwöbel Sarah, Frölich Sascha, Glöckner Franka, Kiebel Stefan J, Li Shu-Chen, Smolka Michael N

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Würzburger Str. 35, 01187, Dresden, Germany.

Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 9;15(1):16260. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00905-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-00905-7
PMID:40346145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12064811/
Abstract

When planning an action sequence, it has been shown that humans prune decision trees to reduce computational complexity, instead of considering all possible options. However, little is understood about pruning employed in probabilistic environments, where actions result in multiple outcomes with varying probabilities, and how decision biases, such as discounting of probabilistic rewards, influence decisions. This study investigates whether participants prune low-probability options in a three-step decision-making task and analyzes the impact of probability discounting on planning. Potential age-related differences in planning strategies are explored in groups of young (aged 18-35 years; n = 57) and older (aged 65-75 years; n = 50) adults. By using reinforcement-learning modeling and model comparison, we show that participants reduce computational demands by pruning decision tree branches of lower probability-a highly efficient strategy in this environment. Additionally, participants reduce their planning depth, i.e., the number of considered steps. Planning is further influenced by discounting high-probability outcomes. Older individuals show stronger reductions in planning depth, an increase in decision noise, and more pronounced probability discounting, which contributes to the observed age-related decline in planning performance. Our findings suggest directions for future research to elucidate the underlying meta-control mechanisms guiding the application of planning strategies.

摘要

在规划一个行动序列时,研究表明,人类会修剪决策树以降低计算复杂度,而不是考虑所有可能的选项。然而,对于概率环境中的修剪,即在行动会导致具有不同概率的多个结果的情况下,以及诸如概率奖励折扣等决策偏差如何影响决策,我们了解得很少。本研究调查了参与者在一个三步决策任务中是否会修剪低概率选项,并分析了概率折扣对规划的影响。在年轻(18至35岁;n = 57)和年长(65至75岁;n = 50)成年人组中探索了规划策略中潜在的年龄相关差异。通过使用强化学习建模和模型比较,我们表明参与者通过修剪较低概率的决策树分支来降低计算需求——这在这种环境中是一种高效策略。此外,参与者会减少他们的规划深度,即所考虑步骤的数量。规划还会受到对高概率结果折扣的影响。年长个体在规划深度上的降低更为明显,决策噪声增加,概率折扣更为显著,这导致了观察到的与年龄相关的规划表现下降。我们的研究结果为未来研究指明了方向,以阐明指导规划策略应用的潜在元控制机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9d/12064811/2ce7212329cf/41598_2025_905_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9d/12064811/17d14da697c9/41598_2025_905_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9d/12064811/486cb45cb041/41598_2025_905_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9d/12064811/e3fd82cce2aa/41598_2025_905_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9d/12064811/dddea8b3dcc4/41598_2025_905_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9d/12064811/2ce7212329cf/41598_2025_905_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9d/12064811/17d14da697c9/41598_2025_905_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9d/12064811/486cb45cb041/41598_2025_905_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9d/12064811/e3fd82cce2aa/41598_2025_905_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9d/12064811/dddea8b3dcc4/41598_2025_905_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9d/12064811/2ce7212329cf/41598_2025_905_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Heuristic pruning of decision trees at low probabilities and probability discounting in sequential planning in young and older adults.年轻人和老年人在顺序规划中基于低概率的决策树启发式剪枝及概率折扣
Sci Rep. 2025 May 9;15(1):16260. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00905-7.
2
The Neural Basis of Aversive Pavlovian Guidance during Planning.规划过程中厌恶性巴甫洛夫引导的神经基础。
J Neurosci. 2017 Oct 18;37(42):10215-10229. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0085-17.2017. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
3
Is it time? Episodic imagining and the discounting of delayed and probabilistic rewards in young and older adults.是否到时间了?在年轻和老年成年人中,情节想象与延迟和概率奖励的折扣。
Cognition. 2020 Jun;199:104222. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104222. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
4
A comparison of 'pruning' during multi-step planning in depressed and healthy individuals.抑郁症患者与健康个体在多步骤规划过程中“修剪”的比较。
Psychol Med. 2021 Mar 12;52(16):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000799.
5
Modeling the effect of reward amount on probability discounting.建模奖励金额对概率折扣的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Mar;95(2):175-87. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-175.
6
Adult age differences in decision making across domains: Increased discounting of social and health-related rewards.不同领域决策中的成人年龄差异:对社会和健康相关奖励的贴现增加。
Psychol Aging. 2016 Nov;31(7):737-746. doi: 10.1037/pag0000131.
7
Reconciliation of Decision-Making Heuristics Based on Decision Trees Topologies and Incomplete Fuzzy Probabilities Sets.基于决策树拓扑结构和不完全模糊概率集的决策启发式协调
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 9;10(7):e0131590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131590. eCollection 2015.
8
The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting.真实奖励与假设奖励对延迟和概率折扣的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jun;63(6):1072-84. doi: 10.1080/17470210903276350. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
9
Sequential delay and probability discounting tasks in mice reveal anchoring effects partially attributable to decision noise.在小鼠中进行的顺序延迟和概率折扣任务揭示了部分归因于决策噪声的锚定效应。
Behav Brain Res. 2022 Aug 5;431:113951. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113951. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
10
Decision heuristics in contexts integrating action selection and execution.在整合行动选择和执行的情境中进行决策启发式。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 20;13(1):6486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33008-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Shorter planning depth and higher response noise during sequential decision-making in old age.老年人在序列决策中计划深度更短,反应噪声更高。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 11;13(1):7692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33274-0.
2
Aging, uncertainty, and decision making-A review.衰老、不确定性与决策——综述
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):773-787. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01064-w. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
3
A computational process-tracing method for measuring people's planning strategies and how they change over time.一种计算过程追踪方法,用于衡量人们的规划策略以及这些策略随时间的变化。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jun;55(4):2037-2079. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01789-5. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
4
Rational use of cognitive resources in human planning.人类规划中的认知资源的合理利用。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Aug;6(8):1112-1125. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01332-8. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
5
Planning in the brain.大脑中的计划。
Neuron. 2022 Mar 16;110(6):914-934. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.018. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
6
Differential prioritization of intramaze cue and boundary information during spatial navigation across the human lifespan.跨人类生命周期的空间导航过程中,迷宫内线索和边界信息的差异优先级化。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 27;11(1):15257. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94530-9.
7
Meta-control: From psychology to computational neuroscience.元控制:从心理学到计算神经科学。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jun;21(3):447-452. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00919-4. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
8
Age differences in risk attitude are shaped by option complexity.风险态度的年龄差异受选项复杂性的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Sep;149(9):1644-1683. doi: 10.1037/xge0000741. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
Reinforcement learning across development: What insights can we draw from a decade of research?发展中的强化学习:我们能从十年的研究中得到哪些启示?
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Dec;40:100733. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100733. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
10
Differential focus on probability and losses between young and older adults in risky decision-making.年轻人和老年人在风险决策中对概率和损失的关注点不同。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2020 Jul;27(4):532-552. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2019.1642442. Epub 2019 Jul 29.