Kaufman Bar, Abu-Ahmad Muhammad, Radinsky Olga, Gharra Eman, Manko Tal, Bhattacharya Baisali, Gologan Daniela, Erlichman Nofar, Meshel Tsipi, Nuta Yoav, Cooks Tomer, Elkabets Moshe, Ben-Baruch Adit, Porgador Angel
The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.
The Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
Mol Cancer. 2025 May 10;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02330-w.
The PD-L1/PD-1 pathway is crucial for immune regulation and has become a target in cancer immunotherapy. However, in order to improve patient selection for immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies, better selection criteria are needed. This study explores how the N-glycosylation of PD-L1 affects its interaction with PD-1 and ICB efficacy, focusing on its four N-linked glycosylation sites: N35, N192, N200, and N219.
Human PD-L1 glycosylation mutants-at each individual site or at all four sites together (Nx4)-were tested for their functional interaction with PD-1 using an artificial immune checkpoint reporter assay (IcAR-PD1). The blocking efficacy of anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 antibodies was evaluated using human breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB231 and MCF7), as well as A375 melanoma and A549 lung carcinoma cells expressing the glycosylation mutants. Results were validated through ex vivo activation and cytotoxicity assays using human CD8+ T cells.
The binding of the PD-L1 mutant to PD-1 was not effectively blocked by anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 ICBs. In contrast, high blocking efficacy of PD-L1 binding to PD-1 was obtained at minimal ICB concentrations when PD-L1 did not express any glycosylation site (PD-L1 mutant). The PD-L1 mutant produced elevated levels of PD-L1 as a soluble (sPD-L1) and extracellular vesicles (EV)-bound molecule; in contrast, the PD-L1 mutant had lower sPD-L1 and EV levels. PD-L1 glycosylation status influenced the ability of PD-L1 interactions with PD-1 to down-regulate T-cell activation and cytotoxicity, with the PD-L1 mutant showing the lowest levels of T cell functions and the PD-L1 mutant the highest.
The N-glycosylation of PD-L1 at all four sites interferes with the ability of anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 ICBs to block PD-L1 interactions with PD-1; in contrast, glycosylation at the N35 site enhances ICB blocking efficacy. These effects are connected to the ability of sPD-L1 to compete with ICB binding to PD-L1 or PD-1. Thus, assessing PD-L1 glycosylation, beyond expression levels, could improve patient stratification and outcomes.
PD-L1/PD-1通路对免疫调节至关重要,已成为癌症免疫治疗的靶点。然而,为了改善免疫检查点阻断(ICB)疗法的患者选择,需要更好的选择标准。本研究探讨了PD-L1的N-糖基化如何影响其与PD-1的相互作用以及ICB疗效,重点关注其四个N-连接糖基化位点:N35、N192、N200和N219。
使用人工免疫检查点报告分析(IcAR-PD1)测试人PD-L1糖基化突变体(在每个单独位点或四个位点一起突变(Nx4))与PD-1的功能相互作用。使用人乳腺癌细胞系(MDA-MB231和MCF7)以及表达糖基化突变体的A375黑色素瘤和A549肺癌细胞评估抗PD-L1和抗PD-1抗体的阻断效力。通过使用人CD8+T细胞的体外激活和细胞毒性试验验证结果。
抗PD-L1和抗PD-1 ICB不能有效阻断PD-L1突变体与PD-1的结合。相反,当PD-L1不表达任何糖基化位点(PD-L1突变体)时,在最低ICB浓度下可获得PD-L1与PD-1结合的高阻断效力。PD-L1突变体产生的可溶性(sPD-L1)和细胞外囊泡(EV)结合分子形式的PD-L1水平升高;相比之下,PD-L1突变体的sPD-L1和EV水平较低。PD-L1糖基化状态影响PD-L1与PD-1相互作用下调T细胞激活和细胞毒性的能力,其中PD-L1突变体的T细胞功能水平最低,而PD-L1突变体的T细胞功能水平最高。
PD-L1在所有四个位点的N-糖基化会干扰抗PD-L1和抗PD-1 ICB阻断PD-L1与PD-1相互作用的能力;相比之下,N35位点的糖基化增强了ICB阻断效力。这些效应与sPD-L1与ICB竞争结合PD-L1或PD-1的能力有关。因此,除了表达水平外,评估PD-L1糖基化可以改善患者分层和治疗结果。