• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用拉施分析验证骨科研究生学员问卷中基于骨科工作场所评估的知识和认知情况。

Using Rasch Analysis for Validation of Knowledge and Perception of Orthopedic Workplace-Based Assessment among Postgraduate Orthopedic Trainees' Questionnaire.

作者信息

Abdulmajid Ahmad Anas, Khalid Kamarul Ariffin

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Oct-Dec;16(4):126-129. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_629_24. Epub 2025 Mar 26.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_629_24
PMID:40351540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12063997/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Workplace-based assessment (WPBA) was formally introduced into orthopedic postgraduate training in Malaysia as of December 2022. Understanding users' knowledge and perception (KAP) of WPBA is essential for ensuring its effective implementation. A systematic review is needed to evaluate whether WPBA is meeting educational expectations.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate a questionnaire designed to assess the knowledge and perception of WPBA among postgraduate orthopedic trainees.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pilot study was conducted from Aug 1, 2022 to May 31, 2023 involving a 28-item questionnaire that had undergone thorough face and content validation. The questionnaire was distributed to orthopedic postgraduate trainees at the Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation, Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). Rasch analysis was performed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the instrument.

RESULTS

The Rasch analysis revealed a person reliability index of 0.93 and a separation index of 3.62, while the item reliability index was 0.99 with a separation index of 8.32. The mean infit and outfit mean square (MNSQ) values were 0.99 and 0.96 respectively, with Z-standard (Z-STD) values of 0.24 and -0.35. Several misfitting items fell outside the acceptable range (0.6-1.4) and were subsequently removed from the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The validation and reliability testing confirmed that the orthopedic WPBA KAP questionnaire recently developed is both reliable and valid for assessing postgraduate trainees' understanding of WPBA.

摘要

引言/背景:自2022年12月起,基于工作场所的评估(WPBA)正式引入马来西亚的骨科研究生培训。了解用户对WPBA的知识和认知(KAP)对于确保其有效实施至关重要。需要进行系统评价以评估WPBA是否符合教育期望。

目的

本研究旨在验证一份旨在评估骨科研究生学员对WPBA的知识和认知的问卷。

材料与方法

于2022年8月1日至2023年5月31日进行了一项试点研究,涉及一份经过全面的表面效度和内容效度验证的包含28个条目的问卷。该问卷分发给了马来西亚国际伊斯兰大学医学院骨科、创伤学与康复系的骨科研究生学员。进行了Rasch分析以评估该工具的心理测量特性。

结果

Rasch分析显示,人员信度指数为0.93,区分指数为3.62,而项目信度指数为0.99,区分指数为8.32。平均拟合度和装备均方(MNSQ)值分别为0.99和0.96,Z标准(Z-STD)值分别为0.24和-0.35。几个不拟合的项目超出了可接受范围(0.6-1.4),随后从问卷中删除。

结论

效度和信度测试证实,最近开发的骨科WPBA KAP问卷对于评估研究生学员对WPBA的理解是可靠且有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21a4/12063997/b75627953faa/JPBS-16-126-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21a4/12063997/b75627953faa/JPBS-16-126-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21a4/12063997/b75627953faa/JPBS-16-126-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Rasch Analysis for Validation of Knowledge and Perception of Orthopedic Workplace-Based Assessment among Postgraduate Orthopedic Trainees' Questionnaire.使用拉施分析验证骨科研究生学员问卷中基于骨科工作场所评估的知识和认知情况。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Oct-Dec;16(4):126-129. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_629_24. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
Perception, attitude, and preference of trainees towards workplace-based assessment in dental education at a tertiary care institute in Multan, Pakistan.巴基斯坦木尔坦一家三级护理机构的牙科学员对基于工作场所的评估的认知、态度和偏好。
Work. 2023;75(2):703-710. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220132.
3
Implementation of workplace-based assessment in general practice.在全科医疗中实施基于工作场所的评估。
Educ Prim Care. 2019 May;30(3):133-144. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2019.1588788. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
4
Perceptions and experiences of trainers and trainees of UK workplace-based assessment for general practice licensing: a mixed methods survey.英国以工作场所为基础的普通实践许可评估的培训师和学员的看法和经验:一项混合方法调查。
Educ Prim Care. 2024 Sep;35(5):147-159. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2024.2379525. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
5
The Quality of Life Impact Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire: validation of the Malay-translated version of the QIRC using Rasch analysis.生活质量对屈光矫正的影响(QIRC)问卷:使用 Rasch 分析验证马来语翻译版 QIRC 的有效性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 25;21(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02145-5.
6
Psychometric properties of the Malay version of the Women's Views of Birth Labour Satisfaction Questionnaire using the Rasch measurement model: a cross sectional study.使用 Rasch 测量模型评估马来语版女性分娩满意度问卷的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 14;20(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02975-z.
7
Validation and Reliability of Healthcare Workers' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Instrument for Uncomplicated Malaria by Rasch Measurement Model.基于拉施测量模型的医护人员对单纯性疟疾的知识、态度和实践工具的效度与信度研究
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jan 10;10:1521. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01521. eCollection 2019.
8
Changes in UK medical trainees' perceptions of workplace-based assessments across 10 years: results from two cross-sectional studies.英国医学实习生对基于工作场所评估的看法在10年间的变化:两项横断面研究的结果
Postgrad Med J. 2022 Apr;98(1158):269-275. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137907. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
9
Linguistic validation of stigmatisation degree, self-esteem and knowledge questionnaire among asthma patients using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析对哮喘患者的污名化程度、自尊和知识问卷进行语言验证。
J Asthma. 2017 Apr;54(3):318-324. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2016.1208222. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
10
Validation of Malaysian Versions of Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale (PDSMS), Medication Understanding and Use Self-Efficacy Scale (MUSE) and 8-Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) Using Partial Credit Rasch Model.使用部分计分Rasch模型对马来西亚版糖尿病自我管理感知量表(PDSMS)、用药理解与使用自我效能量表(MUSE)和8项Morisky用药依从性量表(MMAS-8)进行验证
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):LC01-LC05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/15079.8845. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Chinese doctors' views on workplace-based assessment: trainee and supervisor perspectives of the mini-CEX.中国医生对基于工作场所评估的看法:迷你临床演练评估的学员和带教老师观点。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1869393. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1869393.
2
The potential of workplace-based assessment of international medical graduates.针对国际医学毕业生基于工作场所评估的潜力。
Med J Aust. 2016 Sep 5;205(5):209-10. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00794.
3
The use of mini-CEX in UK foundation training six years following its introduction: lessons still to be learned and the benefit of formal teaching regarding its utility.
迷你临床演练评估在英国基础培训中使用六年之后:仍有经验教训需要吸取,而且正式教学对其效用有益。
Med Teach. 2014 Feb;36(2):155-63. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.836267. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
4
Workplace-based assessment in surgical training: experiences from the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme.外科培训中的基于工作场所的评估:来自跨学院外科课程计划的经验。
ANZ J Surg. 2013 Jun;83(6):448-53. doi: 10.1111/ans.12187. Epub 2013 May 8.