Ismail Nahlah E, Jimam Nanloh S, Dapar Maxwell L P, Ahmad Sohail
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, MAHSA University, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria.
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jan 10;10:1521. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01521. eCollection 2019.
This study assessed the validity and reliability of healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices instrument for uncomplicated malaria (HKAPIUM) for evaluation of healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) on uncomplicated malaria management in primary healthcare (PHC) facilities in Plateau state, Nigeria. Relevant variables from literature, malaria treatment guidelines for Nigeria, and World Health Organization (WHO) were used to generate and present the items for the draft HKAPIUM scale, which was first screened by six experts before administered to 121 respondents who filled and returned immediately. The data were sorted and analyzed using Rasch measurement model (Bond & Fox software). The outcome of the initial screening showed high items content validity indices (I-CVI) (0.83-1.00) and high scale-CVI (S-CVI) {universal agreement (UA) within the experts (S-CVI/UA) (0.67-0.89) and the average CVI [S-CVI/Ave (0.94-0.98)]} for relevance, clarity, simplicity, and comprehensiveness. The Rasch analysis outputs showed good items' reliability for the three factors (KAP) > 0.9 with high separation index values of > 2.0; however person reliability were poor (< 0.6) which were confirmed by their low separation values. Goodness of fit statistics indicated nine items not fitting the model based on the suggested fit index values of 0.6 to 1.5, and ± 2 for mean square (MNSQ) and standardized Z-score (Zstds) respectively, and 0.3 to 0.7 for "point-measure correlation coefficients" (PTMEA Corr). Deletion of misfit items resulted in the items and persons' reliabilities falling above the minimum accepted limit of 0.6, with their separation values were all in the range of 1 and 2 which were acceptable. Similarly, fit index values for MNSQ infit and outfit, and Zstd parameters items in the new scale were all within the acceptable range of 0.6 to 1.5, and ±2 respectively, in addition to the positive PTMEA Corr as further confirmation of the items' fitness to the model. The reduction of 27-items draft HKAPIUM scale to 18 items was successful with good reliability and fitness to the model.
本研究评估了医护人员关于单纯性疟疾的知识、态度和实践工具(HKAPIUM)在尼日利亚高原州初级卫生保健(PHC)机构中用于评估医护人员对单纯性疟疾管理的知识、态度和实践(KAP)的有效性和可靠性。从文献、尼日利亚疟疾治疗指南以及世界卫生组织(WHO)中提取相关变量,用于生成并呈现HKAPIUM量表草案的项目,该草案首先由六位专家进行筛选,然后施测于121名立即填写并返回问卷的受访者。使用Rasch测量模型(Bond & Fox软件)对数据进行分类和分析。初步筛选结果显示,各项目的内容效度指数(I-CVI)较高(0.83 - 1.00),量表的内容效度指数(S-CVI)也较高{专家内部的普遍一致性(UA)(S-CVI/UA)为0.67 - 0.89,平均CVI [S-CVI/Ave(0.94 - 0.98)]},表明在相关性、清晰度、简单性和全面性方面表现良好。Rasch分析结果显示,三个因素(KAP)的项目可靠性良好,均大于0.9,分离指数值大于2.;然而,人员可靠性较差(< 0.6),这通过其较低的分离值得到证实。拟合优度统计表明,根据建议的拟合指数值,有九个项目不适合该模型,具体为:均方(MNSQ)和标准化Z分数(Zstds)分别为0.6至1.5和±2,“点测量相关系数”(PTMEA Corr)为0.3至0.7。删除不拟合的项目后,项目和人员的可靠性均高于可接受的最低限度0.6,其分离值均在1至2的范围内,这是可接受的。同样,新量表中MNSQ的内拟合和外拟合以及Zstd参数项目的拟合指数值均分别在可接受的0.6至1.5和±2的范围内,此外,正向的PTMEA Corr进一步证实了项目与模型的拟合度。将27项的HKAPIUM量表草案成功缩减为18项,且具有良好的可靠性和与模型的拟合度。