Udjianto Udjianto, Sirat Noorhamdani A, Rahardjo Bambang, Zuhriyah Lilik
Doctoral Program in Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bhayangkara Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Narra J. 2025 Apr;5(1):e1671. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.1671. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
Probiotics represent a promising alternative therapy for bacterial vaginosis; however, consensus on the most effective species, strains, and doses remains lacking, and long-term safety data are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics in managing bacterial vaginosis, considering species, strain, clinical outcomes, optimal dosage, duration, and side effects. This study included randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) published in English (2014-2024) on probiotic treatment for bacterial vaginosis, assessing species, strain, dose, duration, and efficacy. A systematic search was conducted on December 20, 2024, in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed using the keywords "vaginosis," "bacterial vaginosis," and "probiotic." Data were extracted and synthesized, and study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool, while NVivo 14 software facilitated thematic analysis. The systematic search yielded 1,560 initial records, of which 16 RCTs were included. The findings revealed that TOM 22.8 (10×10 CFU/day for 10 days) was the most effective strain and dose, significantly improving Nugent scores, vaginal pH, and microbiota composition and reducing bacterial vaginosis recurrence rate. Alternative strains, including and showed therapeutic potential at doses of 1×10 to 5.4 × 10 CFU/day for treatment durations ranging from 6 days to 4 months. The reported side effects were mild and self-limiting. This study supports the use of probiotics as an adjunctive or alternative bacterial vaginosis treatment, emphasizing the need for a personalized approach based on patient characteristics. However, limitations such as small sample sizes and heterogeneous outcome measures necessitate further research. Larger, well-designed trials with standardized methodologies are required to refine probiotic recommendations.
益生菌是细菌性阴道病一种有前景的替代疗法;然而,对于最有效的菌种、菌株和剂量仍缺乏共识,长期安全性数据也有限。本研究的目的是评估益生菌在治疗细菌性阴道病方面的有效性,同时考虑菌种、菌株、临床结局、最佳剂量、疗程和副作用。本研究纳入了2014年至2024年期间以英文发表的关于益生菌治疗细菌性阴道病的随机对照试验(RCT),评估菌种、菌株、剂量、疗程和疗效。2024年12月20日,在Scopus、科学网和PubMed上使用关键词“阴道病”“细菌性阴道病”和“益生菌”进行了系统检索。提取并综合数据,使用偏倚风险2工具评估研究质量,同时NVivo 14软件有助于进行主题分析。系统检索产生了1560条初始记录,其中16项RCT被纳入。研究结果显示,TOM 22.8(10×10 CFU/天,共10天)是最有效的菌株和剂量,能显著改善 Nugent评分、阴道pH值和微生物群组成,并降低细菌性阴道病复发率。其他菌株,包括[具体菌株1]和[具体菌株2],在1×10至5.4×10 CFU/天的剂量下,治疗6天至4个月时显示出治疗潜力。报告的副作用轻微且为自限性。本研究支持将益生菌作为细菌性阴道病的辅助或替代治疗方法,强调需要根据患者特征采取个性化方法。然而,样本量小和结局指标异质性等局限性需要进一步研究。需要更大规模、设计良好且方法标准化的试验来完善益生菌的推荐建议。