Senok Abiola C, Verstraelen Hans, Temmerman Marleen, Botta Giuseppe A
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD006289. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006289.pub2.
The dominance of lactobacilli in healthy vaginal microbiota and its depletion in bacterial vaginosis (BV) has given rise to the concept of oral or vaginal instillation of probiotic Lactobacillus strains for the management of this condition.
To ascertain the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of BV.
We searched electronic databases irrespective of publication status or language. These included: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the HIV/AIDS and STD Cochrane Review Groups' specialized registers, the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field's Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1966 to 2008), EMBASE (1980 to 2007), ISI science citation index (1955 to 2007), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (1982 to 2007).We handsearched of specialty journals, conference proceedings and publications list on the website of the International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (http://www.isapp.net/default.asp).For unpublished studies or ongoing trials, we contacted authors from relevant publications, nutraceutical companies and probiotic-related scientific associations. We searched electronic databases on ongoing clinical trials.
Randomized controlled trials using probiotics for the treatment of women of any age diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis, regardless of diagnostic method used. The probiotic preparation could be single or "cocktail" of strains, any preparation type/dosage/route of administration. Studies comparing probiotics with placebo, probiotics used in conjunction with conventional antibiotics compared with placebo or probiotics alone compared with conventional antibiotics were eligible for inclusion.
We screened titles and abstracts , obtained full reports of relevant trialsand independently appraised them for eligibility. A data extraction form was used to extract data from the four included studies. For dichotomous outcomes, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived for each study using RevMan (versions 4.2 and 5). We did not perform meta-analysis due to significant differences in the probiotic preparations and trial methodologies.
Analysis suggests beneficial outcome of microbiological cure with the oral metronidazole/probiotic regimen (OR 0.09 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.26)) and the probiotic/estriol preparation (OR 0.02, (95% CI 0.00 to 0.47)). For the probiotic/estriol preparation, the OR and 95% CI for physician-reported resolution of symptoms was OR 0.04 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.56).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results do not provide sufficient evidence for or against recommending probiotics for the treatment of BV. The metronidazole/probiotic regimen and probiotic/estriol perparation appear promising but well-designed randomized controlled trials with standardized methodologies and larger patient size are needed.
在健康的阴道微生物群中乳酸杆菌占主导地位,而在细菌性阴道病(BV)中其数量减少,这引发了通过口服或阴道内植入益生菌乳酸杆菌菌株来治疗这种疾病的概念。
确定益生菌治疗BV的疗效。
我们检索了电子数据库,不考虑出版状态或语言。这些数据库包括:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、HIV/AIDS和性传播疾病Cochrane综述小组的专业注册库、Cochrane补充医学领域的对照试验注册库、MEDLINE(1966年至2008年)、EMBASE(1980年至2007年)、ISI科学引文索引(1955年至2007年)、CINAHL(护理学与相关健康文献累积索引,1982年至2007年)。我们手工检索了专业期刊、会议论文集以及国际益生菌和益生元科学协会网站(http://www.isapp.net/default.asp)上的出版物列表。对于未发表的研究或正在进行的试验,我们联系了相关出版物的作者、营养保健品公司和与益生菌相关的科学协会。我们检索了正在进行的临床试验的电子数据库。
使用益生菌治疗任何年龄被诊断为细菌性阴道病的女性的随机对照试验,无论使用何种诊断方法。益生菌制剂可以是单一菌株或“混合菌株”,任何制剂类型/剂量/给药途径。将益生菌与安慰剂进行比较、益生菌与传统抗生素联合使用与安慰剂进行比较或益生菌单独使用与传统抗生素进行比较的研究均符合纳入标准。
我们筛选了标题和摘要,获取了相关试验的完整报告,并独立评估其是否符合纳入标准。使用数据提取表从四项纳入研究中提取数据。对于二分法结果,使用RevMan(4.2版和5版)为每项研究得出比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。由于益生菌制剂和试验方法存在显著差异,我们未进行荟萃分析。
分析表明,口服甲硝唑/益生菌方案(OR 0.09(95%CI 0.03至0.26))和益生菌/雌三醇制剂(OR 0.02,(95%CI 0.00至0.47))在微生物治愈方面有有益结果。对于益生菌/雌三醇制剂,医生报告的症状缓解的OR和95%CI为OR 0.04(95%CI 0.00至0.56)。
结果未提供足够证据支持或反对推荐益生菌用于治疗BV。甲硝唑/益生菌方案和益生菌/雌三醇制剂似乎有前景,但需要设计良好、方法标准化且患者规模更大的随机对照试验。