• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将基于团队的学习应用于医学教育:一个可扩展且资源高效实施的案例研究。

Adapting Team-Based Learning for Medical Education: A Case Study with Scalable and Resource-Efficient Implementation.

作者信息

Jansen Michaela, Kim Cavdar Irina

机构信息

Department of Cell Physiology and Molecular Biophysics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA.

Department of Medical Education, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2024 Dec 19;35(2):883-892. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02246-y. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-02246-y
PMID:40352978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12058633/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Team-based learning (TBL) is a structured collaborative learning strategy where students are able to apply conceptual knowledge in small groups through a sequence of activities comprised of preparation, individual readiness assurance testing, teamwork, and team readiness assurance testing, typically followed by an application exercise. TBL has been gaining popularity in many education institutions and programs across the world and in the USA. This study marks the beginning of implementing TBL as a major active learning modality at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine. Through this initiative, we present TBL as a versatile and adaptable method to improve students' learning and examination outcomes.

METHODS

TBL sessions are conducted in three steps: pre-class preparation, in-class readiness assurance testing, and application-focused exercise. The present study used a modified or abbreviated format, consisting of pre-class preparation and in-class individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) and team readiness assurance test (tRAT) followed by immediate feedback. A Pilot Phase was used to engage early-adopter faculty and optimize session parameters, and an Implementation Phase was used for one organ system, with both phases in the pre-clerkship curriculum and a class size of 180 students. During the Pilot Phase, student participation was voluntary, whereas in the Implementation Phase, participation counted towards a selective session attendance requirement. Therefore, student numbers were significantly smaller during the Pilot Phase supporting gradual optimization of session organization.

RESULTS

iRAT, tRAT, and summative end of organ system section National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) scores were analyzed. We find that participation in an increasing number of TBLs was associated with increased iRAT scores and a decreased performance gap between highest and lowest performers, where the increase in the scores of lowest performers was more substantial than the increase in the scores of highest performers. NBME score analysis showed that TBL participation increased examination performance by an average of 2.4% per TBL session attended.

CONCLUSIONS

We present an implementation strategy for TBL sessions using a two-phased approach. Our process implementation provides a clear roadmap for other health professions or medical schools to implement TBL format sessions in their specific educational context. Importantly, the unique, abbreviated TBL format presented here facilitates implementation and adaptation. Observed learning strategies during tRAT that have been demonstrated to be effective include elaboration, dual coding, specific examples, interleaving, and retrieval practices. Overall, the results indicate a positive impact of TBL participation on final summative exam scores.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02246-y.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193d/12058633/d31590e3806d/40670_2024_2246_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193d/12058633/673e57aca5d5/40670_2024_2246_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193d/12058633/f6272e2861ac/40670_2024_2246_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193d/12058633/d31590e3806d/40670_2024_2246_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193d/12058633/673e57aca5d5/40670_2024_2246_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193d/12058633/f6272e2861ac/40670_2024_2246_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193d/12058633/d31590e3806d/40670_2024_2246_Fig3_HTML.jpg
摘要

目的

基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种结构化的协作学习策略,学生能够通过一系列活动在小组中应用概念性知识,这些活动包括准备、个人准备度保证测试、团队协作以及团队准备度保证测试,通常随后还有一个应用练习。TBL在全球和美国的许多教育机构及项目中越来越受欢迎。本研究标志着在德克萨斯理工大学健康科学中心医学院将TBL作为一种主要的主动学习方式开始实施。通过这一举措,我们将TBL展示为一种通用且适应性强的方法,以提高学生的学习和考试成绩。

方法

TBL课程分三个步骤进行:课前准备、课堂准备度保证测试以及以应用为重点的练习。本研究采用了一种修改后的或简化的形式,包括课前准备、课堂个人准备度保证测试(iRAT)和团队准备度保证测试(tRAT),随后立即给出反馈。一个试点阶段用于让早期采用的教师参与并优化课程参数,一个实施阶段用于一个器官系统,两个阶段均在见习前课程中进行,班级规模为180名学生。在试点阶段,学生参与是自愿的,而在实施阶段,参与度计入选择性课程出勤要求。因此,试点阶段的学生人数明显较少,这有助于逐步优化课程组织。

结果

分析了iRAT、tRAT以及器官系统部分国家医学考试委员会(NBME)总结性考试成绩。我们发现,参与越来越多的TBL课程与iRAT成绩提高以及最高和最低成绩者之间的成绩差距缩小相关,其中最低成绩者的成绩提高幅度比最高成绩者的成绩提高幅度更大。NBME成绩分析表明,每参加一次TBL课程,学生的考试成绩平均提高2.4%。

结论

我们提出了一种采用两阶段方法实施TBL课程的策略。我们的流程实施为其他健康专业或医学院校在其特定教育背景下实施TBL课程形式提供了清晰的路线图。重要的是,这里呈现的独特、简化的TBL形式便于实施和调整。在tRAT期间观察到的已被证明有效的学习策略包括详细阐述、双重编码、具体示例、交错学习和检索练习。总体而言,结果表明参与TBL对最终总结性考试成绩有积极影响。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s40670 - 024 - 02246 - y获取的补充材料。

相似文献

1
Adapting Team-Based Learning for Medical Education: A Case Study with Scalable and Resource-Efficient Implementation.将基于团队的学习应用于医学教育:一个可扩展且资源高效实施的案例研究。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Dec 19;35(2):883-892. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02246-y. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Team-based learning replaces problem-based learning at a large medical school.以团队为基础的学习取代了一所大型医学院的以问题为基础的学习。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02362-4.
3
Exploring a modification to the readiness assurance process in team-based learning.探索基于团队学习的准备情况保证流程的一种改进方法。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2025 Jun 1;49(2):366-373. doi: 10.1152/advan.00062.2024. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
4
Team-Based Learning in the Surgery Clerkship: Impact on Student Examination Scores, Evaluations, and Perceptions.以团队为基础的学习在外科实习中的应用:对学生考试成绩、评估和认知的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Mar-Apr;76(2):408-413. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
5
Modified Team-Based Learning in an Ophthalmology Clerkship in China.中国眼科学实习中的改良团队学习法。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154250. eCollection 2016.
6
Academic performance among pharmacy students using virtual vs. face-to-face team-based learning.药学专业学生采用虚拟与面对面团队学习的学习效果比较。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2349205. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2349205. Epub 2024 May 13.
7
About the association of a lecture-based learning and team-based learning in a pathology course.关于病理学课程中基于讲座的学习和基于团队的学习的关联。
Ann Pathol. 2020 Jul;40(4):329-336. doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2019.11.004. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
8
Weekly team-based learning scores and participation are better predictors of successful course performance than case-based learning performance: role of assessment incentive structure.与基于案例的学习表现相比,基于团队的每周学习得分和参与度是成功完成课程的更好预测指标:评估激励结构的作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Oct 4;21(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02948-6.
9
Exploring the dynamics of situational interest in team-based learning in undergraduate medical education.探索团队学习模式下本科生医学教育情境兴趣的动态变化。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):822. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05769-5.
10
Comparison of individual and team readiness assurance tests in a modified team based learning method.个体和团队准备情况保证测试在改良的团队为基础的学习方法中的比较。
J Dent Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):1032-1036. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12190. Epub 2020 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
When and why do medical students drop out of extracurricular longitudinal general practice tracks? A cross-sectional study from two German medical faculties.医学生何时以及为何退出课外纵向全科医学轨道?来自两所德国医学院的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 15;12(12):e064481. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064481.
2
The Retrieval Practice Hypothesis in Research on Learning by Teaching: Current Status and Challenges.通过教学进行学习的研究中的检索练习假说:现状与挑战
Front Psychol. 2022 May 11;13:842668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.842668. eCollection 2022.
3
Team-based learning: design, facilitation and participation.
团队学习:设计、促进和参与。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 3;20(Suppl 2):461. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y.
4
A Psychological Foundation for Team-Based Learning: Knowledge Reconsolidation.基于团队学习的心理学基础:知识再巩固。
Acad Med. 2019 Dec;94(12):1878-1883. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002810.
5
Learning strategies: a synthesis and conceptual model.学习策略:综合与概念模型。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2016 Aug 10;1:16013. doi: 10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13. eCollection 2016.
6
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.主动学习可提高学生在科学、工程和数学领域的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111. Epub 2014 May 12.
7
Retrieval practice enhances new learning: the forward effect of testing.检索练习可增强新的学习:测试的正向效应。
Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 4;5:286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00286. eCollection 2014.
8
Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65.团队学习:实用指南:AMEE 指南第 65 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e275-87. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
9
Consolidation and reconsolidation: two lives of memories?巩固和再巩固:记忆的双重生命?
Neuron. 2011 Jul 28;71(2):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.037.
10
Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping.检索练习比概念图的精心研究产生更多的学习。
Science. 2011 Feb 11;331(6018):772-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1199327. Epub 2011 Jan 20.