G. Geller is professor, Johns Hopkins University Berman Institute of Bioethics, School of Medicine, Bloomberg School of Public Health, and Department of Sociology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4856-1942 .
D. Grbic is lead research analyst, Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.
Acad Med. 2021 Jul 1;96(7):1036-1042. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003820.
Tolerance for ambiguity (TFA) is important for physicians, with implications for ethical behavior and patient care. This study explores how medical students' TFA changes from matriculation to graduation and how change in empathy and openness to diversity are associated with this change.
Data for students who took the Matriculating Student Questionnaire (MSQ) in 2013 or 2014 and the Medical School Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) in 2017 or 2018 were drawn from the Association of American Medical Colleges (n = 17,221). Both the MSQ and GQ included a validated TFA scale and a shortened version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index; the MSQ also included an openness to diversity scale. Tercile groups were used to assess how TFA changed from the MSQ to GQ, and regression analyses were used to assess associations between change in TFA and openness to diversity and between change in TFA and change in empathy.
Mean TFA scores decreased (d = -.67) among students with the highest TFA at matriculation but increased (d = .60) among students with the lowest TFA at matriculation. Regression results showed that change in TFA was significantly and positively associated with change in empathy (beta = .05, P < .001) and that openness to diversity (as reported at matriculation) was significantly and positively associated with TFA at graduation (beta = .05, P < .001).
This is the first nationally representative study to suggest that medical students' TFA changes over time, but in different directions depending on TFA at matriculation. TFA over time was also associated with change in empathy and openness to diversity. Medical schools should consider strategies to assess TFA in their admissions processes and for cultivating TFA throughout the learning process.
对模糊性的容忍度(TFA)对医生很重要,这对其道德行为和患者护理都有影响。本研究探讨了医学生的 TFA 如何从入学到毕业发生变化,以及同理心和对多样性的开放程度的变化如何与这种变化相关。
从美国医学协会(Association of American Medical Colleges)的数据中抽取了在 2013 年或 2014 年参加新生问卷(MSQ),以及在 2017 年或 2018 年参加医学院毕业问卷(GQ)的学生的数据(n=17221)。MSQ 和 GQ 都包括一个经过验证的 TFA 量表和人际反应指数的缩短版;MSQ 还包括一个对多样性的开放程度量表。使用三分位数组来评估 TFA 从 MSQ 到 GQ 的变化情况,使用回归分析来评估 TFA 变化与对多样性的开放程度之间的关联,以及 TFA 变化与同理心变化之间的关联。
在入学时 TFA 最高的学生中,TFA 得分平均下降(d=-.67),而在入学时 TFA 最低的学生中,TFA 得分平均上升(d=60)。回归结果表明,TFA 的变化与同理心的变化显著正相关(β=0.05,P<0.001),而对多样性的开放程度(入学时报告)与毕业时的 TFA 显著正相关(β=0.05,P<0.001)。
这是第一项全国代表性研究,表明医学生的 TFA 随时间发生变化,但入学时 TFA 的不同方向会导致变化方向不同。随着时间的推移,TFA 也与同理心和对多样性的开放程度的变化有关。医学院应该考虑在招生过程中评估 TFA 的策略,并在整个学习过程中培养 TFA。