Suppr超能文献

医学生对学术出版的接受度:一所机构采用补充性互动讲座的经验

Medical Student Comfort with Academic Publishing: A Single-Institution Experience with a Supplemental Interactive Lecture.

作者信息

Menghani Sanjay V, Fantry George T

机构信息

University of Arizona College of Medicine - Tucson, Tucson, AZ USA.

Medical Scientist Training MD-PhD Program (MSTP), University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2025 Jan 14;35(2):1009-1015. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02278-4. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Since the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 shifted to a Pass/Fail scoring system, increased emphasis has been placed on research output. Medical students choosing to pursue competitive residencies have contributed to research at a higher rate than ever before. Despite this, many medical students may feel uncomfortable leading the effort to widely communicate the results of a project.

METHODS

A quantitative survey-based study was performed to investigate the medical student research landscape at the University of Arizona College of Medicine - Tucson (UACOM-T). Our team surveyed the medical student body on their familiarity and comfort with the publishing process, invited the full student body to attend an optional student-led interactive session on the topic, and surveyed attendees of this lecture to assess for any changes in comfort or attitudes.

RESULTS

A total of 71 medical students completed the pre-session survey, 24 medical students attended the lecture, and 23 medical students completed the post-session survey. Most survey respondents were actively involved in research while in medical school, equal to their involvement prior to matriculation into medical school. Most survey respondents were not comfortable with academic publishing or identifying a predatory journal prior to attending the supplemental educational lecture on academic publishing, which increased their comfort on these topics.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, most study participants were actively involved in research and were at baseline not comfortable with the academic publishing process. Attending a supplemental student-led interactive lecture on academic publishing increased medical student attendees' comfort in being able to identify a fake or predatory journal and increased their overall comfort in the academic publishing process. Similar interactive lectures can help bridge the gap in medical students' understanding of topics in academic publishing.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02278-4.

摘要

引言

自从美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步改为通过/失败评分系统后,对研究产出的重视程度有所增加。选择追求竞争激烈的住院医师职位的医学生进行研究的比例比以往任何时候都更高。尽管如此,许多医学生可能会对主导广泛传播项目结果的工作感到不自在。

方法

开展了一项基于定量调查的研究,以调查亚利桑那大学医学院图森分校(UACOM-T)的医学生研究情况。我们团队就医学生对出版过程的熟悉程度和舒适度对全体医学生进行了调查,邀请全体学生参加关于该主题的由学生主导的可选互动环节,并对该讲座的参与者进行调查,以评估他们在舒适度或态度方面的任何变化。

结果

共有71名医学生完成了会前调查,24名医学生参加了讲座,23名医学生完成了会后调查。大多数调查受访者在医学院就读期间积极参与研究,与他们进入医学院之前的参与程度相当。大多数调查受访者在参加关于学术出版的补充教育讲座之前,对学术出版或识别掠夺性期刊并不自在,而这增加了他们在这些主题上的舒适度。

结论

总之,大多数研究参与者积极参与研究,并且在基线时对学术出版过程并不自在。参加由学生主导的关于学术出版的补充互动讲座提高了参加讲座的医学生识别虚假或掠夺性期刊的舒适度,并提高了他们在学术出版过程中的整体舒适度。类似的互动讲座有助于弥合医学生在学术出版主题理解上的差距。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s40670-024-02278-4获取的补充材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验