• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑出血后左心耳封堵术的缺血性结局:来自HANSE-LAAC注册研究的回顾性逆概率加权分析

Ischemic outcomes after left atrial appendage closure following intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective inverse probability weighting analysis from the HANSE-LAAC registry.

作者信息

Jurczyk Dominik, Mezger Matthias, Lemmer Felicitas, Fatum Caroline, Gradaus Ramon, Drochner-Brocks Nele-Kristin, Saraei Roza, Frerker Christian, Stiermaier Thomas, Paitazoglou Christina, Eitel Ingo

机构信息

Medical Clinic II (Cardiology, Angiology, Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Luebeck, Germany.

German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck/Greifswald, Partner Site Lübeck, Luebeck, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02668-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00392-025-02668-7
PMID:40353873
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with worse outcomes and subsequent high risk for acute arterial ischemic events. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an established procedure in case of atrial fibrillation and adverse events, such as severe bleeding. Clinical benefits of LAAC in patients with ICH are currently unclear.

METHODS

The single-center registry HANSE-LAAC included consecutively treated patients from 2014 to 2022. Index-procedure and standardized follow-ups at 3 and 12 months were analyzed regarding safety and efficacy retrospectively. Mortality, major adverse cardiovascular, and bleeding events were compared between patients with or without ICH. We used Cox proportional hazard models and inverse probability weights to adjust confounders.

RESULTS

401 patients received percutaneous LAAC (ICH 15.2%, n = 61 and non-ICH 84.8%, n = 340). The composite endpoint of death, MACE, and bleeding was significantly lower in the ICH group (HR 0.35, confidence interval [CI] 0.05-4.62, p = 0.0044). This clinical benefit was mainly driven by a significant reduction in bleeding events (HR 0.27; CI 0.06-1.15, p = 0.04). Re-hospitalization was significantly lower as well (HR 0.36; CI 0.20-0.64, p < 0.0001). Adjustment for confounders and inverse probability weighting for the probability of ICH showed no statistically significant difference in mortality (HR 0.53, CI 0.15-1.92, p = 0.33), stroke (HR 0.32 CI 0.03-3.13, p = 0.33), bleeding (HR 0.26; CI 0.05-1.29, p = 0.02), and MACE (HR 0.29; CI 0.04-2.36, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

LAAC in ICH was safe and associated with less MACE, bleeding, and re-hospitalization. Randomized-controlled trials are needed to confirm these first positive signs.

摘要

背景

脑出血(ICH)与较差的预后以及随后发生急性动脉缺血事件的高风险相关。经皮左心耳封堵术(LAAC)是房颤及严重出血等不良事件情况下的既定手术。目前尚不清楚LAAC对ICH患者的临床益处。

方法

单中心登记研究HANSE-LAAC纳入了2014年至2022年连续接受治疗的患者。对索引手术以及3个月和12个月时的标准化随访进行回顾性安全性和有效性分析。比较有或无ICH患者的死亡率、主要不良心血管和出血事件。我们使用Cox比例风险模型和逆概率权重来调整混杂因素。

结果

401例患者接受了经皮LAAC(ICH患者占15.2%,n = 61;非ICH患者占84.8%,n = 340)。ICH组的死亡、MACE和出血复合终点显著更低(风险比[HR]0.35,置信区间[CI]0.05 - 4.62,p = 0.0044)。这种临床益处主要由出血事件显著减少驱动(HR 0.27;CI 0.06 - 1.15,p = 0.04)。再住院率也显著更低(HR 0.36;CI 0.20 - 0.64,p < 0.0001)。对混杂因素进行调整以及对ICH发生概率进行逆概率加权后,死亡率(HR 0.53,CI 0.15 - 1.92,p = 0.33)、中风(HR 0.32,CI 0.03 - 3.13,p = 0.33)、出血(HR 0.26;CI 0.05 - 1.29,p = 0.02)和MACE(HR 0.29;CI 0.04 - 2.36,p = 0.002)均无统计学显著差异。

结论

ICH患者进行LAAC是安全的,且与较少的MACE、出血和再住院相关。需要进行随机对照试验来证实这些初步的积极迹象。

相似文献

1
Ischemic outcomes after left atrial appendage closure following intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective inverse probability weighting analysis from the HANSE-LAAC registry.脑出血后左心耳封堵术的缺血性结局:来自HANSE-LAAC注册研究的回顾性逆概率加权分析
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02668-7.
2
Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.左心耳封堵术与直接口服抗凝剂在伴有心房颤动的高危患者中的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 30;75(25):3122-3135. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.067.
3
4-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Nonwarfarin Oral Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation.左心耳封堵术与非华法林口服抗凝药治疗心房颤动的 4 年结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 4;79(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.023. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
4
5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials.左心耳封堵术后 5 年的结果:来自 PREVAIL 和 PROTECT AF 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70(24):2964-2975. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
5
An Updated Meta-Analysis on the Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.房颤患者经皮左心耳封堵术与直接口服抗凝治疗临床结局的最新荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;200:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.05.044. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with primary hemostasis disorders and atrial fibrillation.经皮左心耳封堵术治疗原发性止血障碍合并心房颤动患者。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Aug;64(2):497-509. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-01073-0. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
7
Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure versus medical treatment in atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis from randomised trials.心房颤动患者左心耳封堵术与药物治疗的疗效及安全性:一项基于随机试验的网状Meta分析
Heart. 2017 Jan 15;103(2):139-147. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309782. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
8
Surgical and transcatheter left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.心房颤动和肥厚型心肌病患者的外科及经导管左心耳封堵术
Europace. 2023 May 19;25(5). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad101.
9
Effect of Glomerular Filtration Rates on Outcomes Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure.肾小球滤过率对经皮左心耳封堵术后结局的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 15;145:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.081. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
10
Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Patients with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and Atrial Fibrillation: the LAA-CAA Cohort.左心耳封堵术治疗伴有脑淀粉样血管病和心房颤动的患者:LAA-CAA 队列。
Transl Stroke Res. 2021 Apr;12(2):259-265. doi: 10.1007/s12975-020-00838-5. Epub 2020 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Left Atrial Appendage Closure after Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动消融术后左心耳封堵
N Engl J Med. 2025 Apr 3;392(13):1277-1287. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2408308. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
2
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2024年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心房颤动管理指南,与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)联合制定。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3314-3414. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae176.
3
Meta-Analysis of Oral Anticoagulants and Adverse Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients After Intracranial Hemorrhage.
心房颤动患者颅内出血后口服抗凝剂与不良结局的荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 15;9:961000. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.961000. eCollection 2022.
4
True Efficacy of LAA Closure: Patient Outcomes on Long-term Single-Antiplatelet or No Therapy: Insights From the EWOLUTION Registry.左心耳封堵的真实疗效:长期单抗血小板或无抗栓治疗患者的结局:来自 EWOLUTION 注册研究的启示。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 May;34(5):E348-E355. doi: 10.25270/jic/21.00240.
5
The ALSTER-FLX Registry: 3-Month outcomes after left atrial appendage occlusion using a next-generation device, a matched-pair analysis to EWOLUTION.ALSTER-FLX 注册研究:新一代左心耳封堵器械 3 个月随访结果,与 EWOLUTION 研究配对分析
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jun;19(6):917-926. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.02.011. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Predictors of Device-Related Thrombus Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.经皮左心耳封堵术后器械相关血栓的预测因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jul 27;78(4):297-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.098.
7
Association Between Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Subsequent Arterial Ischemic Events in Participants From 4 Population-Based Cohort Studies.四项基于人群的队列研究中参与者的脑出血与随后的动脉缺血性事件之间的关联。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):809-816. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0925.
8
Risk of intracerebral haemorrhage from hypertension is greatest at an early age.高血压引发脑出血的风险在早年时最高。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Mar;6(1):28-35. doi: 10.1177/2396987321994296. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
9
Risk of intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.直接口服抗凝剂颅内出血风险:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2022 Feb;269(2):664-675. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10448-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
10
Risk factors for intracerebral haemorrhage - Results from a prospective population-based study.脑出血的危险因素——一项基于人群的前瞻性研究结果
Eur Stroke J. 2020 Sep;5(3):278-285. doi: 10.1177/2396987320932069. Epub 2020 Jun 12.