Simwinga Musonda, Mahlatsi Palesa A, Molale Masemote, Witola Gracious, Mshanga Isaac, Katende Bulemba, Amstutz Alain, Reither Klaus, Shanaube Kwame, Motlomelo Masetsibi, Bond Virginia, Belus Jennifer M
Zambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
SolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 24;3(10):e0002430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002430. eCollection 2023.
The sudden emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had a devastating impact on health systems and population health globally. To combat the spread of COVID-19, countries enacted guidelines and safety measures, including testing, contact tracing, and quarantine. It was unclear the extent to which uptake of COVID-19 testing and other health initiatives would be accepted in countries with a history of dealing with widespread communicable disease transmission such as HIV or Tuberculosis. The objective of this study was to understand and compare the facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 testing at hospital sites in two rural communities in Lesotho and community spaces (referred to as hubs) in one urban community in Zambia during active phases of COVID-19 pandemic. Individual interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) were held during March-October 2021 to explore facilitators and barriers to COVID-19 testing. FGDs with 105 community members and health care workers, and 16 individual interviews with key informants and four mystery shoppers were conducted across the two countries. In Zambia, four mystery shopper observations, and eight hub observations were also conducted. Individual country codebooks were developed and combined; thematic analyses were then conducted using the combined codebook. Findings were compared across the two countries, and most were consistent across the two countries. Two primary themes emerged that related to both barriers and facilitators: (1) structural conditions; (2) social implications and attitudes. The structural conditions that operated as barriers in both countries included public health isolation measures and misinformation. In Lesotho, the cost of tests was an additional barrier. The only structural facilitators were in Zambia where the community hubs were found to be accessible and convenient. The social implication barriers related to fear of isolation, stigma, and mental health implications because of quarantine, perceived pain of the test, and compromised privacy. Social facilitators that led to people testing included experiencing COVID-19 firsthand and knowing people who had died because of COVID-19. Across both countries, primary barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 related to structural conditions and social implications and attitudes. Public health measures can be at odds with social and economic realities; pandemic response should balance public health control and the socio-economic needs. Data from Zambia revealed that community-based settings have the potential to increase uptake of testing services. Community-based campaigns to normalize and reduce stigma for COVID-19 testing services are needed.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的突然出现对全球卫生系统和人群健康产生了毁灭性影响。为了抗击COVID-19的传播,各国制定了指导方针和安全措施,包括检测、接触者追踪和隔离。在有应对如艾滋病毒或结核病等广泛传染病传播历史的国家,COVID-19检测及其他卫生举措的接受程度尚不清楚。本研究的目的是了解和比较在COVID-19大流行活跃阶段,莱索托两个农村社区的医院场所及赞比亚一个城市社区的社区空间(称为中心)进行COVID-19检测的促进因素和障碍。在2021年3月至10月期间进行了个人访谈和焦点小组讨论(FGD),以探讨COVID-19检测的促进因素和障碍。在两国对105名社区成员和医护人员进行了焦点小组讨论,对关键信息提供者进行了16次个人访谈,并对四名神秘顾客进行了访谈。在赞比亚,还进行了四次神秘顾客观察和八次中心观察。分别编写并合并了两国的编码手册;然后使用合并后的编码手册进行主题分析。对两国的研究结果进行了比较,大多数结果在两国是一致的。出现了两个与障碍和促进因素相关的主要主题:(1)结构条件;(2)社会影响和态度。在两国都构成障碍的结构条件包括公共卫生隔离措施和错误信息。在莱索托,检测费用是另一个障碍。唯一的结构促进因素出现在赞比亚,那里的社区中心被认为方便可达。社会影响障碍与对隔离的恐惧、耻辱感以及因隔离产生的心理健康影响、检测带来的疼痛感和隐私受到侵犯有关。促使人们进行检测的社会促进因素包括亲身经历COVID-19以及认识因COVID-19死亡的人。在两国,COVID-19检测的主要障碍和促进因素都与结构条件、社会影响及态度有关。公共卫生措施可能与社会和经济现实不一致;应对大流行应平衡公共卫生控制和社会经济需求。赞比亚的数据显示,基于社区的环境有提高检测服务接受度的潜力。需要开展基于社区的活动,使COVID-19检测服务常态化并减少耻辱感。