• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validation of the Turkish version of the Developmental Behavior Checklist: a comprehensive tool for assessing emotional, behavioral, and autism spectrum disorders in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities.《发育行为检查表》土耳其语版本的验证:一种用于评估智障儿童和青少年情绪、行为及自闭症谱系障碍的综合工具。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 28;16:1579629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1579629. eCollection 2025.
2
Concurrence of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and developmental behaviour checklist among children with an intellectual disability.智力障碍儿童的长处和困难问卷与发展行为检查表的一致性。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Feb;62(2):150-155. doi: 10.1111/jir.12426. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
3
Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014.8 岁儿童自闭症谱系障碍患病率 - 自闭症及发育障碍监测网,美国 11 个监测点,2014 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Apr 27;67(6):1-23. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6706a1.
4
An evaluation of the German teacher version of the Developmental Behaviour Checklist in children and adolescents with intellectual disability.
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2022 Dec;47(4):365-375. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2022.2044269. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
5
Psychometric properties of the revised Developmental Behaviour Checklist scales in Dutch children with intellectual disability.荷兰智障儿童修订版发育行为检查表量表的心理测量特性
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2002 Jan;46(Pt 1):61-75. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00353.x.
6
Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 4 Years - Early Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, Seven Sites, United States, 2010, 2012, and 2014.4 岁儿童自闭症谱系障碍的流行率和特征——早期自闭症和发育障碍监测网络,美国七个地点,2010、2012 和 2014 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Apr 12;68(2):1-19. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6802a1.
7
Inter-rater reliability of the Developmental Behaviour Checklist for Adults in community accommodation settings.社区住宿环境下成人发育行为检查表的评定者间信度。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 Jul;55(7):710-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01372.x. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
8
DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder maximizes diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in preschool children.DSM-5 自闭症谱系障碍诊断标准最大限度地提高了学龄前儿童的诊断敏感性和特异性。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;54(6):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01674-1. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
9
The development of a new measure for the assessment of psychopathology in adults with intellectual disability.一种用于评估成年智力残疾者精神病理学的新测量方法的开发。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005 Jul;49(Pt 7):469-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00701.x.
10
Autism Spectrum Disorder自闭症谱系障碍

本文引用的文献

1
An evaluation of the German teacher version of the Developmental Behaviour Checklist in children and adolescents with intellectual disability.
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2022 Dec;47(4):365-375. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2022.2044269. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
2
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist in a Clinical Sample of Autistic Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities and Co-Occurring Mental Health Problems: Psychometric Properties, Factor Structure, and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance.针对患有智力障碍和并发心理健康问题的自闭症个体临床样本的异常行为检查表:心理测量特性、因素结构和纵向测量不变性。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Jan 4. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06697-5.
3
Prevalence of intellectual disability among adults born in the 1980s and 1990s in the United States.美国 20 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代出生的成年人中智力残疾的流行率。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2024 Apr;68(4):377-384. doi: 10.1111/jir.13119. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
Adult psychiatric and psychosocial outcomes of children with mild intellectual disability: a register follow-up of a population-based cohort.儿童轻度智力障碍患者的成年精神科和心理社会结局:基于人群队列的登记随访。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2024 Jan;68(1):34-44. doi: 10.1111/jir.13087. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
5
The prevalence of significant cognitive delay among 3- to 4-year-old children growing up in low- and middle-income countries: results from 126 nationally representative surveys undertaken in 73 countries.在中低收入国家,3 至 4 岁儿童中存在显著认知延迟的比例:73 个国家的 126 项全国代表性调查结果。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2023 Dec;67(12):1200-1215. doi: 10.1111/jir.12976. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
6
General Measurement Tools for Assessing Mental Health Problems Among Children and Adolescents with an Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.一般的测量工具评估智障儿童和青少年心理健康问题:系统评价。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Jan;53(1):132-204. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05419-5. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
7
Prevalence estimates of mental health problems in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis.智力残疾儿童和青少年心理健康问题的患病率估计:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;54(10):970-984. doi: 10.1177/0004867420924101. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
Concurrence of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and developmental behaviour checklist among children with an intellectual disability.智力障碍儿童的长处和困难问卷与发展行为检查表的一致性。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Feb;62(2):150-155. doi: 10.1111/jir.12426. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
9
Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders Among Children With Intellectual Disability.智力残疾儿童中自闭症谱系障碍的患病率。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Nov;121(6):487-500. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-121.6.487.
10
"Intellectual developmental disorders": reflections on the international consensus document for redefining "mental retardation-intellectual disability" in ICD-11.“智力发育障碍”:关于国际共识文件中在《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)中重新定义“智力迟钝 - 智力残疾”的思考
Adv Ment Health Intellect Disabil. 2016;10(1):36-58. doi: 10.1108/AMHID-10-2015-0050.

《发育行为检查表》土耳其语版本的验证:一种用于评估智障儿童和青少年情绪、行为及自闭症谱系障碍的综合工具。

Validation of the Turkish version of the Developmental Behavior Checklist: a comprehensive tool for assessing emotional, behavioral, and autism spectrum disorders in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities.

作者信息

Uygun Sabide Duygu, Çıkılı Uytun Merve, Konşuk Ünlü Hande, Akgül Doğru Ayşegül, Aktaş Altunay Serpil, Öztop Didem Behice, Kılıç Birim Günay, Munir Kerim

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.

Institute of Public Health, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 28;16:1579629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1579629. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1579629
PMID:40357518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12066420/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Developmental Behavior Checklist (DBC) is a standardized tool for evaluating emotional and behavioral concerns in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities (ID) in clinical and research settings. This study aims to validate the Turkish versions of the DBC autism screening algorithm (ASA), parent (P) and teacher (T) forms.

METHODS

Parents and teachers of 312 children and adolescents aged 4-17 with ID completed the Turkish versions of the DBC forms and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The presence of ASD or any other psychiatric disorder was assessed through clinical evaluation based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) guidelines. Analyses of validity and reliability were conducted to evaluate the internal consistency, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), convergent validity, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

Among the participants, 30.6% (n=70) had a psychiatric comorbid diagnosis according to the DSM-5-TR. DBC-P exhibited a sensitivity of 64.4%, a specificity of 87.6%, and an AUC of 76%. DBC-T demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.7%, a specificity of 75.8%, and an AUC of 82.7%. Additionally, 23.1% (n=45) were diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The DBC-ASA showed a sensitivity of 58.1%, a specificity of 64.6%, and an AUC of 61.3%. The DBC forms displayed strong internal consistency, robust test-retest reliability, and significant correlation with the SDQ measures. Inter-rater agreement between the DBC-P and DBC-T was low to moderate. A significant difference between parent and teacher assessments highlights the need for multi-informant approaches (p <.001).

DISCUSSION

The DBC-P and DBC-T exhibit high validity and reliability, while the DBC-ASA shows moderate accuracy. This study acts as a valuable resource for clinicians, providing enhanced support for Turkish children and adolescents with ID.

摘要

引言

发育行为检查表(DBC)是一种标准化工具,用于在临床和研究环境中评估智力残疾(ID)儿童和青少年的情绪和行为问题。本研究旨在验证DBC自闭症筛查算法(ASA)的土耳其语版本、家长(P)版和教师(T)版。

方法

312名4至17岁患有ID的儿童和青少年的家长和教师完成了DBC表格的土耳其语版本以及优势与困难问卷(SDQ)。根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版文本修订版(DSM-5-TR)指南,通过临床评估来评估自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)或任何其他精神疾病的存在情况。进行了效度和信度分析,以评估内部一致性、敏感性、特异性、曲线下面积(AUC)、收敛效度、评分者间信度和重测信度。

结果

在参与者中,根据DSM-5-TR,30.6%(n = 70)患有精神疾病共病诊断。DBC-P的敏感性为64.4%,特异性为87.6%,AUC为76%。DBC-T的敏感性为89.7%,特异性为75.8%,AUC为82.7%。此外,23.1%(n = 45)被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)。DBC-ASA的敏感性为58.1%,特异性为64.6%,AUC为61.3%。DBC表格显示出很强的内部一致性、稳健的重测信度,并且与SDQ测量值有显著相关性。DBC-P和DBC-T之间的评分者间一致性为低到中等。家长和教师评估之间的显著差异凸显了多信息源方法的必要性(p <.001)。

讨论

DBC-P和DBC-T具有较高的效度和信度,而DBC-ASA显示出中等准确性。本研究为临床医生提供了宝贵的资源,为土耳其患有ID的儿童和青少年提供了更多支持。