• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺钼靶检查中乳腺纹理的影像组学实质表型及其与乳腺癌风险的关联

Radiomic Parenchymal Phenotypes of Breast Texture from Mammography and Association with Risk of Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Winham Stacey J, McCarthy Anne Marie, Scott Christopher G, Gastounioti Aimilia, Horng Hannah, Norman Aaron D, Mankowski Walter C, Pantalone Lauren, Jensen Matthew R, Acciavatti Raymond J, Maidment Andrew D A, Cohen Eric A, Brandt Kathleen R, Conant Emily F, Kerlikowske Karla M, Kontos Despina, Vachon Celine M

机构信息

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Biobusiness Bldg 5-81, Rochester, MN 55905.

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

出版信息

Radiology. 2025 May;315(2):e240281. doi: 10.1148/radiol.240281.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.240281
PMID:40358450
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12127954/
Abstract

Background Parenchymal phenotypes reflect the intrinsic heterogeneity of both tissue structure and distribution on mammograms. Purpose To define parenchymal phenotypes on the basis of radiomic texture features derived from full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in breast screening populations and assess associations of parenchymal phenotypes with future risk of breast cancer and masking (false-negative [FN] findings or interval cancers), beyond breast density, and by race and ethnicity Materials and Methods A two-stage study design included a retrospective cross-sectional study of 30 000 randomly selected women with four-view FFDM (mean age, 57.4 years) and a nested case-control study of 1055 women with invasive breast cancer (151 Black and 893 White women) matched to 2764 women without breast cancer (411 Black and 2345 White women) (mean age, 60.4 years) sampled from April 2008 to September 2019 from three diverse breast screening practices. Radiomic features ( = 390) were extracted and standardized using an automated pipeline and adjusted for age and practice. Variation was classified using hierarchical clustering and principal component (PC) analysis. The resulting clusters and PCs were examined for association with invasive breast cancer risk, FN findings on mammograms, and symptomatic interval cancers beyond radiologist-reported Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density using conditional logistic regression and likelihood ratio tests. Discrimination for breast cancer was assessed with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Six clusters and six PCs were defined, replicated, and associated with a higher risk of invasive breast cancer ( = .01 and < .001, respectively) after adjustment for age, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), and BI-RADS breast density. PCs showed similar associations among Black and White women ( = .23). PCs were also positively associated with FN findings ( = .004) and symptomatic interval cancers ( = .006). AUC improved for all breast cancer end points when incorporating PCs, with the greatest improvement shown in prediction of FN findings (AUC with vs without PCs, 0.73 [95% CI: 0.68, 0.78] vs 0.66 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.71] , respectively; = .004) and symptomatic interval cancers (AUC with vs without PCs, 0.77 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.82] vs 0.68 [95% CI: 0.62, 0.74], respectively; = .006). Conclusion Parenchymal phenotypes based on radiomic features extracted from FFDM were associated with a higher risk of invasive breast cancer, specifically for FN findings and symptomatic interval cancer. © RSNA, 2025 See also the editorial by Mesurolle and El Khoury in this issue.

摘要

背景 实质表型反映了乳房X线照片上组织结构和分布的内在异质性。目的 基于从乳腺筛查人群的全视野数字化乳腺摄影(FFDM)中提取的影像组学纹理特征来定义实质表型,并评估实质表型与未来乳腺癌风险及掩盖现象(假阴性[FN]结果或间期癌)之间的关联,超越乳腺密度,并按种族和民族进行分析。材料与方法 两阶段研究设计包括对30000名随机选取的进行四视图FFDM检查的女性(平均年龄57.4岁)进行回顾性横断面研究,以及对1055名浸润性乳腺癌女性(151名黑人女性和893名白人女性)进行巢式病例对照研究,这些患者与2764名无乳腺癌女性(411名黑人女性和2345名白人女性)(平均年龄60.4岁)匹配,这些样本于2008年4月至2019年9月从三种不同的乳腺筛查机构中选取。使用自动化流程提取并标准化影像组学特征(n = 390),并对年龄和机构进行调整。使用层次聚类和主成分(PC)分析对变异进行分类。使用条件逻辑回归和似然比检验,检查所得聚类和主成分与浸润性乳腺癌风险、乳房X线照片上FN结果以及超出放射科医生报告的乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)乳腺密度的有症状间期癌之间的关联。使用受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积评估对乳腺癌的鉴别诊断能力。结果 定义、复制了六个聚类和六个主成分,在调整年龄、体重指数(以千克为单位的体重除以以米为单位的身高的平方)和BI-RADS乳腺密度后,它们与浸润性乳腺癌风险较高相关(分别为P = 0.01和P < 0.001)。主成分在黑人和白人女性中显示出相似的关联(P = 0.23)。主成分也与FN结果(P = 0.004)和有症状间期癌(P = 0.006)呈正相关。纳入主成分后,所有乳腺癌终点的AUC均有所改善,在预测FN结果方面改善最大(有主成分与无主成分时的AUC分别为0.73[95%CI:0.68,0.78]和0.66[95%CI:0.61,0.71];P = 0.004)以及有症状间期癌(有主成分与无主成分时的AUC分别为0.77[95%CI:0.71,0.82]和0.68[95%CI:0.62,0.74];P = 0.006)。结论 基于从FFDM中提取的影像组学特征的实质表型与浸润性乳腺癌风险较高相关,特别是对于FN结果和有症状间期癌。©RSNA,2025 另见本期Mesurolle和El Khoury的社论。

相似文献

1
Radiomic Parenchymal Phenotypes of Breast Texture from Mammography and Association with Risk of Breast Cancer.乳腺钼靶检查中乳腺纹理的影像组学实质表型及其与乳腺癌风险的关联
Radiology. 2025 May;315(2):e240281. doi: 10.1148/radiol.240281.
2
Radiomic Phenotypes of Mammographic Parenchymal Complexity: Toward Augmenting Breast Density in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.乳腺实质复杂性的放射组学表型:在乳腺癌风险评估中增强乳腺密度。
Radiology. 2019 Jan;290(1):41-49. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180179. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
3
Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts.乳腺钼靶摄影与联合补充性全乳腺超声断层成像术在致密型乳腺患者中用于癌症检测的比较。
Radiology. 2024 Jun;311(3):e231680. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231680.
4
Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.采用半自动和全自动方法及乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)评估乳腺癌风险和乳腺钼靶密度
Radiology. 2017 Feb;282(2):348-355. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152062. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
5
Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer: Additive Value of Radiomics of Breast Parenchyma.数字乳腺 X 线摄影在乳腺癌中的应用:乳腺实质的放射组学的附加价值。
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):15-20. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181113. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
6
Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.乳腺X线密度和结构特征在乳腺X线筛查中可单独或共同影响乳腺癌风险评估:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 7;16:414. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2450-7.
7
Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.乳腺摄影筛查方式对乳腺密度评估的影响:数字乳腺摄影与数字乳腺断层合成。
Radiology. 2019 May;291(2):320-327. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181740. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
8
Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.基于模拟病变的衍生乳腺 X 线摄影屏蔽措施可预测已知危险因素控制后间隔期癌症的风险:病例对照分析。
Med Phys. 2019 Mar;46(3):1309-1316. doi: 10.1002/mp.13410. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
9
Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.自动化和临床乳腺成像报告和数据系统密度测量预测筛查和间期癌症的风险:病例对照研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jun 5;168(11):757-765. doi: 10.7326/M17-3008. Epub 2018 May 1.
10
Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.深度学习风险评分与标准乳腺密度评分在乳腺癌风险预测中的比较。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):265-272. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190872. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrative radiomics of intra- and peri-tumoral features for enhanced risk prediction in thymic tumors: a multimodal analysis of tumor microenvironment contributions.整合瘤内和瘤周特征的放射组学以增强胸腺瘤风险预测:肿瘤微环境贡献的多模态分析
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jul 17;25(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01790-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Extending the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Model of Invasive Breast Cancer.扩展乳腺癌监测联盟浸润性乳腺癌模型。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 1;42(7):779-789. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02470. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
2
Robust cross-vendor mammographic texture models using augmentation-based domain adaptation for long-term breast cancer risk.使用基于增强的域适应技术构建用于长期乳腺癌风险评估的强大跨厂商乳腺X线纹理模型。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Sep;10(5):054003. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.5.054003. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
3
Assessing Breast Cancer Risk by Combining AI for Lesion Detection and Mammographic Texture.
利用人工智能进行病灶检测和乳腺纹理分析来评估乳腺癌风险。
Radiology. 2023 Aug;308(2):e230227. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230227.
4
Combining Molecular and Radiomic Features for Risk Assessment in Breast Cancer.联合分子和放射组学特征进行乳腺癌风险评估。
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2023 Aug 10;6:299-311. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020722-092748. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Beyond Breast Density: Risk Measures for Breast Cancer in Multiple Imaging Modalities.超越乳腺密度:多种影像学模式下乳腺癌的风险评估指标。
Radiology. 2023 Mar;306(3):e222575. doi: 10.1148/radiol.222575. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
6
Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature.实质纹理研究在乳腺密度和乳腺癌风险中的应用:文献中方法的系统评价。
Breast Cancer Res. 2022 Dec 30;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13058-022-01600-5.
7
A comparison of the imaging appearance of breast cancer in African American women with non-Latina white women.非裔美国女性与非拉丁裔白种女性乳腺癌的影像学表现比较。
Clin Imaging. 2023 Jan;93:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
8
Improved generalized ComBat methods for harmonization of radiomic features.改进的广义 ComBat 方法用于协调放射组学特征。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 8;12(1):19009. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23328-0.
9
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer imaging.癌症成像中的人工智能与机器学习
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Oct 27;2:133. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00199-0. eCollection 2022.
10
AI recognition of patient race in medical imaging: a modelling study.人工智能识别医学影像中的患者种族:一项建模研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jun;4(6):e406-e414. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00063-2. Epub 2022 May 11.