• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Racial disparities in posttransplant outcomes among recipients undergoing simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation.接受同期肝肾移植的受者移植后结局的种族差异。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 1;37(7):844-863. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002962. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
Overall Graft Loss Versus Death-Censored Graft Loss: Unmasking the Magnitude of Racial Disparities in Outcomes Among US Kidney Transplant Recipients.总体移植失败与死亡截尾移植失败:揭示美国肾移植受者结局中种族差异的程度。
Transplantation. 2017 Feb;101(2):402-410. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001119.
3
Access to Kidney Transplantation for Minority Children With End-Stage Renal Disease and Predictors of Post-Transplant Outcome: Impact of Race and Ethnicity.终末期肾病少数族裔儿童获得肾移植的情况及移植后结局的预测因素:种族和民族的影响
Pediatr Transplant. 2025 Feb;29(1):e70024. doi: 10.1111/petr.70024.
4
Racial and ethnic disparities in post-liver transplant outcomes for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: An analysis of the UNOS database.慢性加急性肝衰竭患者肝移植术后结局的种族和民族差异:UNOS 数据库分析。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Oct;60(8):1087-1109. doi: 10.1111/apt.18221. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
5
Association of Race and Ethnicity With Live Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United States From 1995 to 2014.1995年至2014年美国种族与活体供肾移植的关联
JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):49-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19152.
6
Heart Transplant Equity: Effect of 2018 Allocation Policy Change on Recipient Mortality and Morbidity by Race and Ethnicity.心脏移植公平性:2018年分配政策变化对不同种族和族裔受者死亡率及发病率的影响
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Jun 1;240(6):884-896. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001374. Epub 2025 May 14.
7
Association of Race and Ethnicity With High Longevity Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Under the US Kidney Allocation System.种族和民族与美国肾脏分配系统下长寿已故供体肾移植的关系。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Oct;84(4):416-426. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.02.017. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
8
Black Patients Have Unequal Access to Listing for Liver Transplantation in the United States.美国的黑人患者在接受肝移植名单方面存在不平等的机会。
Hepatology. 2021 Sep;74(3):1523-1532. doi: 10.1002/hep.31837.
9
Disparities in liver transplantation: the association between donor quality and recipient race/ethnicity and sex.肝移植中的差异:供体质量与受者种族/民族和性别之间的关系。
Transplantation. 2014 Apr 27;97(8):862-9. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000438634.44461.67.
10
Evaluation of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cardiac Transplantation.评估心脏移植中的种族和民族差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 7;10(17):e021067. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.021067. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Significant improvements, but consistent disparities in survival for African Americans after liver transplantation.肝移植后非裔美国人的生存率虽有显著改善,但仍存在持续差异。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Jun;36(6):e14646. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14646. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
2
Impact on Waitlist Outcomes from Changes in the Medical Eligibility of Candidates for Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Following Implementation of the 2017 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Policy in the United States.美国 2017 年器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络政策实施后,候选者同时进行肝肾移植的医学资格变化对候补者结果的影响。
Ann Transplant. 2022 Feb 18;27:e934850. doi: 10.12659/AOT.934850.
3
Kidney utilization and outcomes of liver transplant recipients who were listed for kidney after liver transplant after the implementation of safety net policy.实施安全网政策后,肝移植受者在肝移植后被列入肾移植名单的肾脏利用情况及结局。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Feb;36(2):e14522. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14522. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
4
Trends in Chronic Kidney Disease Care in the US by Race and Ethnicity, 2012-2019.2012-2019 年美国按种族和民族划分的慢性肾脏病护理趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2127014. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27014.
5
Changes and mediators of survival disparity among Black liver transplant recipients in the United States.美国黑人肝移植受者生存率差异的变化及其影响因素。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Dec;21(12):3883-3893. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16767. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
6
Simultaneous liver kidney allocation policy and the Safety Net: an early examination of utilization and outcomes in the United States.同时肝肾分配政策与安全网:美国对其使用和结果的早期考察。
Transpl Int. 2021 Jun;34(6):1052-1064. doi: 10.1111/tri.13891. Epub 2021 May 19.
7
The Impact of the 2017 Kidney Allocation Policy Change on Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Utilization and Outcomes.2017 年肾脏分配政策变化对肝肾联合应用及其结果的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2021 Aug;27(8):1106-1115. doi: 10.1002/lt.26053. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
8
New OPTN Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant (SLKT) Policy Improves Racial and Ethnic Disparities.器官共享联合网络(OPTN)新的肝肾联合移植(SLKT)政策减少了种族差异。
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 1;9(12):3901. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123901.
9
Random forest-based imputation outperforms other methods for imputing LC-MS metabolomics data: a comparative study.基于随机森林的插补方法在 LC-MS 代谢组学数据插补方面优于其他方法:一项比较研究。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Oct 11;20(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3110-0.
10
A Comprehensive Analysis of Liver Transplantation Outcomes Among Ethnic Minorities in the United States.美国少数民族肝移植结局的综合分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;54(3):263-270. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001236.

接受同期肝肾移植的受者移植后结局的种族差异。

Racial disparities in posttransplant outcomes among recipients undergoing simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation.

作者信息

Lee David Uihwan, Shaik Mohammed Rifat, Schuster Kimberly, Kolachana Sindhura, Bahadur Aneesh, Lee Ki Jung, Chou Harrison, Fan Gregory Hongyuan, Jung Daniel, Karagozian Raffi

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.

Liver Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 1;37(7):844-863. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002962. Epub 2025 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002962
PMID:40359273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12140916/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage cirrhosis may experience renal dysfunction, necessitating a simultaneous kidney-liver transplant (SKLT). Guidelines have been put forth by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to streamline the SKLT allocation process and ensure equitable access to transplantation. However, there is a scarcity of literature on racial and ethnic disparities in post-SKLT outcomes.

METHODS

The UNOS Standard Transplant Analysis and Research Database was queried from 2005 to 2019 to study SKLT patients. Patients were stratified by race: White (reference group) recipients ( n  = 3513), Black recipients ( n  = 859), Hispanic recipients ( n  = 964), Asian recipients ( n  = 206), and other recipients ( n  = 85). Primary endpoints included all-cause mortality and graft failure while secondary endpoints were specific causes of death.

RESULTS

Hispanic recipients had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.93, P  = 0.003), while Black recipients had a significantly increased risk of graft failure compared to Whites (aHR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.16-2.30, P  = 0.005). Evaluation of specific causes of recipient death revealed a higher risk of death due to gastrointestinal hemorrhage among Blacks (aHR: 4.16, 95% CI: 1.04-16.68, P  = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our study findings show Black patients experience higher rates of graft failure compared to White counterparts. The reasons for these disparities are not fully understood but likely a combination of biological and social factors. Further investigation is warranted to ascertain the specific factors influencing these outcomes.

摘要

背景

终末期肝硬化患者可能会出现肾功能障碍,因此需要同时进行肝肾移植(SKLT)。器官共享联合网络(UNOS)已制定指南,以简化SKLT分配流程并确保公平的移植机会。然而,关于SKLT术后种族和民族差异的文献较少。

方法

查询2005年至2019年的UNOS标准移植分析与研究数据库,以研究SKLT患者。患者按种族分层:白人(参照组)受者(n = 3513)、黑人受者(n = 859)、西班牙裔受者(n = 964)、亚裔受者(n = 206)和其他受者(n = 85)。主要终点包括全因死亡率和移植物失败,次要终点是具体死因。

结果

西班牙裔受者全因死亡率风险较低(调整后风险比:0.79,95%置信区间:0.68 - 0.93,P = 0.003),而黑人受者与白人相比移植物失败风险显著增加(调整后风险比:1.63,95%置信区间:1.16 - 2.30,P = 0.005)。对受者死亡具体原因的评估显示,黑人因胃肠道出血死亡的风险较高(调整后风险比:4.16,95%置信区间:1.04 - 16.68,P = 0.04)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,与白人患者相比,黑人患者移植物失败率更高。这些差异的原因尚未完全了解,但可能是生物因素和社会因素共同作用的结果。有必要进一步调查以确定影响这些结果的具体因素。