Waldecker Moritz, Custodio Lorie Jane, Ohlmann Brigitte, Rammelsberg Peter, Rues Stefan
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Aug;134(2):435.e1-435.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.04.031. Epub 2025 May 13.
Tooth-to-implant-supported fixed partial dentures (TI-FPDs) are a valuable treatment option for the shortened dental arch. For naturally healthy abutment teeth or abutment teeth with small restorations, inlays or adhesive wings present - as opposed to complete crowns - minimally invasive FPD retainer elements. Data on TI-FPDs with minimally invasive retainer designs are sparse.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare test forces correlating with fracture (ultimate load, F) or formation of initial damage (force at first damage, F) and the failure modes of TI-FPDs with different retainer designs fabricated using either monolithic zirconia (mZir) or veneered cobalt chromium alloy frameworks (vCo-Cr).
The situation of a 3-unit FPD to replace a maxillary first molar with the second premolar as an abutment tooth and an implant in the region of the second molar was simulated. For mZir-TI-FPDs, 3 different retainer designs of the second premolar, inlay (IR), adhesive wing (WR) and complete crown (CC), were examined (n=8). In addition, the restorations with an adhesive wing and complete crown were also fabricated in metal-ceramic (n=8). After FPD fabrication and adhesive cementation to Co-Cr die replicas covered by shrink wrap tubes to simulate tooth mobility and implants with standard abutments, all 5 test groups were subjected to fracture load tests without artificial aging. The fracture load (F) was determined under oblique loading of the mesiopalatal cusp of the pontic. Additional FPDs (n=8) were fabricated for the inlay and adhesive wing retainer designs and subjected to artificial aging consisting of 150 days water storage at 37 °C including thermocycling (37 500×6.5 °C and 60 °C) and mastication simulation (1 200 000×108 N) after adhesive cementation. Specimens surviving artificial aging were subjected to fracture load tests as described previously.
For monolithic zirconia restorations, the first damage to the restoration was always fracture. Mean fracture resistances for mZir-WR-TI-FPDs were F=996 N without aging and F=1033 N after aging. Slightly higher load-bearing capacity was observed for mZir-IR-TI-FPDs with F=1067 N without aging and F=1192 N after aging. Without exception, vCo-Cr-WR-TI-FPDs were either predamaged (cracks within the veneering ceramics, F=108 N) or showed major chipping which was defined as fracture (F=F=108 N) after mastication simulation, achieving F=806 N after aging in contrast with F=1222 N for the unaged counterparts. Unaged mZir-CC-TI-FPDs were associated with F=1159 N compared with F=1860 N for vCo-Cr-CC-TI-FPDs. However, for this metal-ceramic group, cracking of the veneer started at F=1126 N.
All TI-FPDs showed clinically acceptable load-bearing capacity. Complications can occur with veneered TI-FPDs in the form of chipping even with low masticatory forces.
牙-种植体支持的固定局部义齿(TI-FPD)是短牙弓的一种重要治疗选择。对于天然健康的基牙或有小修复体、嵌体或粘结翼的基牙,与全冠相比,嵌体、粘结翼是微创的FPD固位体。关于具有微创固位体设计的TI-FPD的数据很少。
本体外研究的目的是比较与骨折相关的测试力(极限载荷,F)或初始损伤形成(首次损伤时的力,F),以及使用整体氧化锆(mZir)或烤瓷钴铬合金框架(vCo-Cr)制作的不同固位体设计的TI-FPD的失效模式。
模拟用第二前磨牙作为基牙、第二磨牙区域植入种植体来替代上颌第一磨牙的3单位FPD的情况。对于mZir-TI-FPD,检查了第二前磨牙的3种不同固位体设计,嵌体(IR)、粘结翼(WR)和全冠(CC)(n=8)。此外,粘结翼和全冠修复体也用金属陶瓷制作(n=8)。在将FPD制作并粘结到用收缩包裹管覆盖的Co-Cr模具复制品上以模拟牙齿移动性,并粘结到带有标准基台的种植体上后,所有5个测试组均进行无人工老化的断裂载荷测试。在桥体近中腭尖的斜向加载下测定断裂载荷(F)。为嵌体和粘结翼固位体设计制作了额外的FPD(n=8),并在粘结后进行人工老化,包括在37°C下储存150天,包括热循环(37500×6.5°C和60°C)和咀嚼模拟(1200000×108N)。经过人工老化后存活的标本按先前所述进行断裂载荷测试。
对于整体氧化锆修复体,修复体的首次损伤总是骨折。mZir-WR-TI-FPD的平均抗折强度在未老化时F=996N,老化后F=1033N。mZir-IR-TI-FPD的承载能力略高,未老化时F=1067N,老化后F=1192N。无一例外,vCo-Cr-WR-TI-FPD在咀嚼模拟后要么预先受损(饰面陶瓷内出现裂纹,F=108N),要么出现严重崩瓷,这被定义为骨折(F=F=108N),老化后F=806N,而未老化的对应物为F=1222N。未老化的mZir-CC-TI-FPD的F=1159N,而vCo-Cr-CC-TI-FPD为F=1860N。然而,对于这个金属陶瓷组,饰面的裂纹在F=1126N时开始出现。
所有TI-FPD均显示出临床可接受的承载能力。即使咀嚼力较小,烤瓷TI-FPD也可能出现崩瓷等并发症。