• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生成式人工智能工具的使用通过职前教师之间共享元认知和认知卸载,提高了可持续教育中的学业成绩。

Generative AI tool use enhances academic achievement in sustainable education through shared metacognition and cognitive offloading among preservice teachers.

作者信息

Iqbal Javed, Hashmi Zarqa Farooq, Asghar Muhammad Zaheer, Abid Muhammad Naseem

机构信息

School of English Studies, Zhejiang International Studies University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 13;15(1):16610. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01676-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-01676-x
PMID:40360573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12075473/
Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence tools in education has emerged as a transformative approach to enhancing learning outcomes, particularly in the context of sustainable development goals (SDG4). Therefore, the present study investigates the connection between generative artificial intelligence tool usage (GenAITU) and academic achievement (AA) in the context of SDG4. We assessed the mediating role of shared metacognition (SMC) and cognitive offloading (COL) in this relationship among preservice teachers (PSTs). The indicators, including performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), facilitating conditions (FC), and use behavior (UB), are derived from adapting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) for GenAITU. The authors surveyed 465 students from five universities in Wuhan, China, using a 7-point Likert scale through a time-lag design. Statistical analysis was performed through partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), to determine the relationship between variables. Findings indicated that two components of GenAITU, namely PE and UB, showed significant positive associations with AA, while the other two, EE and FC, did not show significant and positive relationships with AA. Results also showed that three dimensions of GenAITU, namely EE, FC, and UB have a positive and significant association with SMC while PE has a positive and significant connection with SMC. All four components of GenAITU like PE, EE, FC, and UB have positive and significant links with COL. SMC and COL have a positive and significant relationship with AA. Results also indicated that SMC mediated the connections between GenAITU (EE, FC, and UB) and AA. Outcomes also indicated that COL mediated the connections between GenAITU (PE, EE, FC, and UB) and AA. The current study shows that SMC and COL were strong mediators of the association between GenAITU and AA. The results of our study provide guidance to teachers, curriculum planners, and university management to successfully integrate GenAITU into the education for PSTs.

摘要

生成式人工智能工具在教育中的整合已成为提升学习成果的一种变革性方法,尤其是在可持续发展目标(SDG4)的背景下。因此,本研究在SDG4的背景下调查了生成式人工智能工具使用(GenAITU)与学业成绩(AA)之间的联系。我们评估了共享元认知(SMC)和认知卸载(COL)在职前教师(PSTs)这种关系中的中介作用。包括绩效期望(PE)、努力期望(EE)、促进条件(FC)和使用行为(UB)在内的指标,是通过对技术接受与使用统一理论2(UTAUT2)进行改编以适用于GenAITU而得出的。作者通过时间滞后设计,使用7点李克特量表对中国武汉五所大学的465名学生进行了调查。通过偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS - SEM)进行统计分析,以确定变量之间的关系。研究结果表明,GenAITU的两个组成部分,即PE和UB,与AA呈显著正相关,而另外两个部分,EE和FC,与AA没有显著正相关关系。结果还表明,GenAITU的三个维度,即EE、FC和UB与SMC呈正显著相关,而PE与SMC呈正显著相关。GenAITU的所有四个组成部分,如PE、EE、FC和UB,与COL都有正显著联系。SMC和COL与AA呈正显著关系。结果还表明,SMC介导了GenAITU(EE、FC和UB)与AA之间的联系。结果还表明,COL介导了GenAITU(PE、EE、FC和UB)与AA之间的联系。当前研究表明,SMC和COL是GenAITU与AA之间关联的强有力中介。我们的研究结果为教师、课程规划者和大学管理层成功将GenAITU整合到PSTs的教育中提供了指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ac/12075473/553513e6146b/41598_2025_1676_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ac/12075473/81c8e80027cc/41598_2025_1676_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ac/12075473/ec02e231d749/41598_2025_1676_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ac/12075473/553513e6146b/41598_2025_1676_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ac/12075473/81c8e80027cc/41598_2025_1676_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ac/12075473/ec02e231d749/41598_2025_1676_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ac/12075473/553513e6146b/41598_2025_1676_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Generative AI tool use enhances academic achievement in sustainable education through shared metacognition and cognitive offloading among preservice teachers.生成式人工智能工具的使用通过职前教师之间共享元认知和认知卸载,提高了可持续教育中的学业成绩。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 13;15(1):16610. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01676-x.
2
The role of grit in inclusive education: a study of motivation and achievement among preservice physical education teachers.毅力在全纳教育中的作用:职前体育教师的动机与成就研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 29;15:1332464. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332464. eCollection 2024.
3
Longitudinal study of teacher acceptance of mobile virtual labs.教师对移动虚拟实验室接受度的纵向研究。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022 Dec 12:1-34. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11499-2.
4
Assessment of physical education teachers' use of distance teaching behavior under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情影响下体育教师远程教学行为的评估
PeerJ. 2025 Jan 20;13:e18743. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18743. eCollection 2025.
5
The impact of pedagogical beliefs on the adoption of generative AI in higher education: predictive model from UTAUT2.教学信念对高等教育中生成式人工智能采用的影响:基于UTAUT2的预测模型
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Oct 17;7:1497705. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1497705. eCollection 2024.
6
Factors Affecting Patients' Use of Electronic Personal Health Records in England: Cross-Sectional Study.影响英国患者使用电子个人健康记录的因素:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 31;21(7):e12373. doi: 10.2196/12373.
7
Factors Influencing College Students' Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Behavior in Mathematics Learning: A Case from China.影响大学生在数学学习中使用生成式人工智能行为的因素:来自中国的案例
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 2;15(3):295. doi: 10.3390/bs15030295.
8
Responses to the AI Revolution in Hospitality and Tourism Higher Education: The Perception of Students Towards Accepting and Using Microsoft Copilot.酒店与旅游高等教育对人工智能革命的回应:学生对接受和使用微软Copilot的看法
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Mar 14;15(3):35. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15030035.
9
Examining Students' Acceptance and Use of ChatGPT in Saudi Arabian Higher Education.审视沙特阿拉伯高等教育中学生对ChatGPT的接受度与使用情况。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Mar 17;14(3):709-721. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14030047.
10
What is the influence of psychosocial factors on artificial intelligence appropriation in college students?社会心理因素对大学生人工智能应用有何影响?
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 4;13(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02328-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Students encouraging other students' learning: Leadership shared metacognition in practice.学生鼓励学生学习:实践中的共享元认知领导力。
New Dir Stud Leadersh. 2024 Sep;2024(183):131-143. doi: 10.1002/yd.20634. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
2
Analysis of college students' attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: effect of intent to use, verification of information and responsible use.大学生对在学术活动中使用 ChatGPT 的态度分析:使用意向、信息验证和负责任使用的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 8;12(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01764-z.
3
Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-Powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: A mixed-methods study.
基于扩展技术接受模型的人工智能驱动的ChatGPT在教育中支持元认知自我调节学习的接受度:一项混合方法研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 9;10(8):e29317. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29317. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
4
A systematic review of the role of teachers' support in promoting socially shared regulatory strategies for learning.教师支持在促进社会共享学习监管策略中作用的系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 14;14:1208012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208012. eCollection 2023.
5
Generative AI for brain image computing and brain network computing: a review.用于脑图像计算和脑网络计算的生成式人工智能:综述
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jun 13;17:1203104. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1203104. eCollection 2023.
6
Mutual interplay between cognitive offloading and secondary task performance.认知卸载和次要任务表现之间的相互作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2250-2261. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02312-3. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
7
Just write it down: Similarity in the benefit from cognitive offloading in young and older adults.就写下来:年轻人和老年人在认知减负中获益的相似性。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1580-1592. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01413-7. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
Improving the Behavioral Intention of Continuous Online Learning Among Learners in Higher Education During COVID-19.提升新冠疫情期间高等教育学习者持续在线学习的行为意向
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 26;13:857709. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857709. eCollection 2022.
9
Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory.认知卸载的后果:提高表现但降低记忆。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Sep;74(9):1477-1496. doi: 10.1177/17470218211008060. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
10
From metacognitive beliefs to strategy selection: does fake performance feedback influence cognitive offloading?从元认知信念到策略选择:虚假表现反馈会影响认知卸载吗?
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2654-2666. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01435-9. Epub 2020 Oct 26.