Zhang Nan, Liu Chao, Yuan Qianhui, Geng Renyu, Meng Xi, Yao Wanxiang, Gao Weijun
Innovation Institute for Sustainable Maritime Architecture Research and Technology, Qingdao, 266033, China.
Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu, 8080135, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 14;15(1):16670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96591-6.
The correlation between sound and psychophysiological health is complex. This study explores effects of various sound pressure levels (SPLs) on psychophysiological responses, utilizing dynamic features of neural activity. Two sound types (traffic noise and spring water sound) and five SPLs (40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 dBA) were tested, with no sound serving as the control condition. The electrocardiography (ECG) and electroencephalogram (EEG) of 38 young college students were collected. The results indicate that spring water sound (SWS) significantly enhances sound perception, with sound comfort votes (SCV) and sound pleasure votes (SPV) increasing by 0.10-0.95 and 0.05-1.10, respectively. SWS facilitated parasympathetic nervous system comfort. Compared to the no sound, as SPLs increased, LF/HF decreased (by 0.07-0.41), and SDNN increased (by 8.85-18.56 ms), whereas traffic noise (TN) exhibited the opposite trend. For brain oscillatory activity, α, θ, and β power-associated with stress recovery-initially increased and then decreased with rising SPLs under spring water sound exposure. At 50 dBA SWS, effective delay duration, linked to comfort, peaked at 284.78 ms. Conversely, the α power and τe for TN diminished with increasing SPLs. The left frontal-parietal and right occipital lobes exhibited the highest sensitivity (p < 0.01). SWS exposure reduced the avalanche critical index (ACI) by 4.78-17.29% compared to no sound, enhancing brain comfort, while TN increased the ACI by 2.28-29.37%. The 50 dBA SWS showed the greatest improvement in brain comfort, being 1.74 times higher than that of TN. Furthermore, compared to no sound, brain power loss was lower for 52.63-63.16% of participants exposed to 50-60 dBA SWS. This study provides a methodology for soundscape evaluation and enhances understanding of how brain activity changes under sound exposure can improve the indoor acoustic environment.
声音与心理生理健康之间的关联十分复杂。本研究利用神经活动的动态特征,探讨了不同声压级(SPL)对心理生理反应的影响。测试了两种声音类型(交通噪音和泉水声)以及五个声压级(40、45、50、55和60分贝),并将无声音作为对照条件。收集了38名年轻大学生的心电图(ECG)和脑电图(EEG)数据。结果表明,泉水声(SWS)显著增强了声音感知,声音舒适度投票(SCV)和声音愉悦度投票(SPV)分别增加了0.10 - 0.95和0.05 - 1.10。SWS促进了副交感神经系统的舒适度。与无声音相比,随着声压级增加,低频/高频比值(LF/HF)降低(降低了0.07 - 0.41),而标准偏差(SDNN)增加(增加了8.85 - 18.56毫秒),而交通噪音(TN)则呈现相反趋势。对于脑振荡活动,与压力恢复相关的α、θ和β功率在泉水声暴露下最初随声压级升高而增加,然后降低。在50分贝的泉水声条件下,与舒适度相关的有效延迟持续时间在284.78毫秒时达到峰值。相反,交通噪音的α功率和τe随声压级增加而减小。左额顶叶和右枕叶表现出最高的敏感性(p < 0.01)。与无声音相比,暴露于泉水声使雪崩临界指数(ACI)降低了4.78 - 17.29%,增强了大脑舒适度,而交通噪音使ACI增加了2.28 - 29.37%。50分贝的泉水声在大脑舒适度方面改善最大,比交通噪音高1.74倍。此外,与无声音相比,暴露于50 - 60分贝泉水声的参与者中,有52.63 - 63.16%的人大脑功率损失更低。本研究为声景评估提供了一种方法,并增进了对声音暴露下大脑活动变化如何改善室内声学环境的理解。