Abreu Danilo José Machado de, Lorenço Mário Sérgio, Machado Gilson Gustavo Lucinda, Silva Joana Moratto, Azevedo Estela Corrêa de, Carvalho Elisângela Elena Nunes
Microbiology Agricultural Sector, Natural Sciences Institute (ICN), Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil.
Institute of Science, Technology and Innovation (ICTIN), Federal University of Lavras, São Sebastião do Paraíso 37950-000, MG, Brazil.
Foods. 2025 Apr 23;14(9):1463. doi: 10.3390/foods14091463.
This study evaluated the impact of different drying methods on the physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory qualities of coffees produced in the Campos das Vertentes (CV) and Alta Mogiana (AM) regions of Brazil. The sun-drying (S), sun-drying combined with rotary mechanical dryer (SM), and CoffeeDryer mechanical dryer (C) methods were compared at different harvest times for the same crop (2024). The results indicated that CoffeeDryer preserved relatively high levels of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity, reaching 3.24 g of gallic acid equivalents per 100 g (g EAG·100 g) and 47.96% antioxidant protection in the coffees produced in Alta Mogiana, whereas the sun-dried coffees presented relatively low values (2.20 g EAG·100 g and 28.96% protection). In the Campos das Vertentes region, C maintained 2.78 g EAG·100 g phenolic compounds and 50.29% antioxidant protection, outperforming combined drying (2.48 g EAG·100 g and 41.17%). Regardless of the region and time of harvest, the coffees dried by C had a water activity of less than 0.6 and more stable moisture content (7.73-10.42%), reducing the possibility of proliferation of filamentous fungi and, consequently, mycotoxins. In the sensory evaluation, CoffeeDryer guaranteed higher scores for fragrance/aroma and flavor, allowing the coffees to reach 80 to 81 points on the SCA scale, which is classified as special. Thus, the use of CoffeeDryer proved to be an efficient alternative for optimizing coffee drying, preserving its chemical and microbiological qualities, and enhancing its commercial and sensory value.
本研究评估了不同干燥方法对巴西坎波斯达斯韦尔滕特斯(CV)和阿尔塔莫吉亚纳(AM)地区生产的咖啡的物理化学、微生物和感官品质的影响。在同一作物(2024年)的不同收获时间,对日晒干燥(S)、日晒与旋转式机械干燥机结合干燥(SM)以及CoffeeDryer机械干燥机(C)方法进行了比较。结果表明,CoffeeDryer能保留相对较高水平的酚类化合物和抗氧化活性,在阿尔塔莫吉亚纳地区生产的咖啡中,每100克达到3.24克没食子酸当量(g EAG·100 g)和47.96%的抗氧化保护率,而日晒咖啡的值相对较低(2.20 g EAG·100 g和28.96%的保护率)。在坎波斯达斯韦尔滕特斯地区,C保持了2.78 g EAG·100 g的酚类化合物和50.29%的抗氧化保护率,优于联合干燥(2.48 g EAG·100 g和41.17%)。无论地区和收获时间如何,用C干燥的咖啡水分活度小于0.6,水分含量更稳定(7.73 - 10.42%),降低了丝状真菌增殖以及因此产生霉菌毒素的可能性。在感官评价中,CoffeeDryer保证了咖啡在香气/香味和风味方面得分更高,使咖啡在SCA评分表上达到80至81分,属于特级分类。因此,使用CoffeeDryer被证明是优化咖啡干燥、保持其化学和微生物品质以及提高其商业和感官价值的有效替代方法。