Leite Ângela, Vieira da Silva Catarina
Center for Philosophical and Humanistic Studies, Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4710-302 Braga, Portugal.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;13(9):967. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13090967.
: Social sustainability is deeply connected to the well-being of marginalized groups, and it is important to highlight how mental health impacts the social inclusion of homeless individuals, particularly veterans. Homelessness is a growing global issue, disproportionately affecting U.S. veterans, with mental health challenges playing a significant role in its onset and perpetuation. Purpose: This study aims to compare the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of homeless veterans and non-veterans in the U.S. : Using public data ( = 6295), this quantitative study applies descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. : Homeless veterans are more likely than non-veterans to be older, male, and identify as Caucasian or African American. They are more frequently high school graduates or have higher education, and report being divorced, widowed, married, or in varied employment statuses (full-time, part-time, or unemployed). Veterans exhibit higher rates of severe mental illnesses, schizophrenia, trauma- and stressor-related disorders, ADHD, bipolar disorder, personality disorders, depression, anxiety, and substance or alcohol use disorders. However, they are less likely than non-veterans to report substance-induced disorders, intoxication, dependence, or abuse involving cocaine, cannabis, opioids, and other substances. : Psychosocial interventions for homeless veterans should prioritize mental health-related concerns, whereas efforts for homeless non-veterans should focus on addressing substance use. Future research should develop tailored interventions, explore the sociodemographic factors influencing homelessness, and investigate the interplay between trauma, mental health, and substance use. Addressing these issues can contribute to a more resilient, inclusive, and sustainable society by providing long-term support and integration opportunities for those most affected. The novelty of this study lies in distinguishing between mental health issues prevalent in veterans and substance use disorders more common in non-veterans, offering insights for tailored interventions. It also connects these findings to social sustainability, suggesting that addressing these issues can promote a more inclusive and resilient society.
社会可持续性与边缘化群体的福祉紧密相连,重要的是要凸显心理健康如何影响无家可归者,尤其是退伍军人的社会融入。无家可归是一个日益严重的全球性问题,对美国退伍军人的影响尤为严重,心理健康挑战在其产生和持续存在中起着重要作用。目的:本研究旨在比较美国无家可归退伍军人和非退伍军人的社会人口统计学和临床特征。方法:本定量研究使用公共数据(n = 6295),应用描述性和推断性统计分析。结果:无家可归的退伍军人比非退伍军人更有可能年龄较大、为男性,且自认为是白种人或非裔美国人。他们更常是高中毕业生或受过高等教育,并报告处于离婚、丧偶、已婚或各种就业状态(全职、兼职或失业)。退伍军人患严重精神疾病、精神分裂症、创伤和应激源相关障碍、注意力缺陷多动障碍、双相情感障碍、人格障碍、抑郁症、焦虑症以及物质或酒精使用障碍的比例更高。然而,与非退伍军人相比,他们报告由物质引起的障碍、中毒、依赖或涉及可卡因、大麻、阿片类药物和其他物质的滥用的可能性较小。结论:针对无家可归退伍军人的心理社会干预应优先考虑与心理健康相关的问题,而针对无家可归非退伍军人的工作应侧重于解决物质使用问题。未来的研究应制定针对性的干预措施,探索影响无家可归的社会人口统计学因素,并调查创伤、心理健康和物质使用之间的相互作用。通过为受影响最严重的人提供长期支持和融入机会,解决这些问题有助于建设一个更具韧性、包容性和可持续性的社会。本研究的新颖之处在于区分了退伍军人中普遍存在的心理健康问题和非退伍军人中更常见的物质使用障碍,为针对性干预提供了见解。它还将这些发现与社会可持续性联系起来,表明解决这些问题可以促进一个更具包容性和韧性的社会。