Suppr超能文献

通过消除特定尺寸的孔隙缺陷提高激光粉末床熔融IN718工艺开发效率

Improving Laser Powder Bed Fusion IN718 Process Development Efficiency by Eliminating Pore Defects of Specified Size.

作者信息

Wang Yuzhong, Guo Wenhua, Li Wenxian, Zhang Yaru, Ma Kaiyue, Ji Qianyu, Han Rui, Zhang Yihui, Wang Chenwei, Zhao Sihang, Lu Bingheng

机构信息

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China.

National Innovation Institute of Additive Manufacturing, Xi'an 710300, China.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2025 Apr 24;18(9):1929. doi: 10.3390/ma18091929.

Abstract

The rapid identification of process windows in laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing garnered significant attention for its ability to reduce upfront engineering costs. This study focuses on accelerating the development of process windows by targeting the elimination of specific-size pore defects in L-PBF IN718. A novel relative density-porosity similarity evaluation method (DPSEM) is introduced to evaluate the reliability of porosity data derived from computed tomography (CT). Using the response surface method, the fully dense forming window (e.g., relative density ≥ 99%) was accurately located within a wide process parameter range (18-1000 J/mm) in a single test. Comparative analysis with the relative density (RD) model highlighted differences in solution set distribution, positioning efficiency, microstructure, and performance within the process window. Results demonstrate that the proposed method effectively eliminates specified size defects (90 μm), achieving a maximum density of 99.5% alongside excellent mechanical properties, including an ultimate tensile strength of 1155 MPa and a yield strength of 908 MPa. In contrast, the RD model achieved a lower maximum density of 98.5%, with mechanical performance compromised by significant MC compound precipitation and keyhole pore accumulation, resulting in an ultimate tensile strength slightly exceeding 910 MPa.

摘要

激光粉末床熔融(L-PBF)增材制造中工艺窗口的快速识别因其能够降低前期工程成本而备受关注。本研究聚焦于通过消除L-PBF IN718中特定尺寸的孔隙缺陷来加速工艺窗口的开发。引入了一种新颖的相对密度-孔隙率相似性评估方法(DPSEM)来评估源自计算机断层扫描(CT)的孔隙率数据的可靠性。使用响应面法,在一次测试中就能在较宽的工艺参数范围(18-1000 J/mm)内准确确定全致密成型窗口(例如,相对密度≥99%)。与相对密度(RD)模型的对比分析突出了工艺窗口内解集分布、定位效率、微观结构和性能方面的差异。结果表明,所提出的方法有效消除了特定尺寸的缺陷(90μm),实现了99.5%的最大密度以及优异的机械性能,包括1155 MPa的极限抗拉强度和908 MPa的屈服强度。相比之下,RD模型的最大密度较低,为98.5%,其机械性能因大量MC化合物析出和匙孔孔隙堆积而受到影响,导致极限抗拉强度略超过910 MPa。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5937/12072660/4cc65895b91a/materials-18-01929-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验