Suppr超能文献

Ti6Al4V合金表面及孔隙率对骨整合的影响:家兔体内初步研究

Effect of Ti6Al4V Alloy Surface and Porosity on Bone Osseointegration: In Vivo Pilot Study in Rabbits.

作者信息

Vanaclocha Amparo, Vanaclocha Vicente, Atienza Carlos M, Jordá-Gómez Pablo, Primo-Capella Víctor, Blasco Jose R, Portolés Luis, Saiz-Sapena Nieves, Vanaclocha Leyre

机构信息

Biomechanics Institute of Valencia, Polytechnic University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.

Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2025 May 6;18(9):2141. doi: 10.3390/ma18092141.

Abstract

Unmodified Ti6Al4V can osseointegrate, but sometimes this capacity needs to be improved. This study aimed to see how much porosity improves osseointegration in a Ti6Al4V implant. Three types of Ti6Al4V cylindrical-shaped implants (13.00 mm length × 5.00 mm diameter) were evaluated: solid sandblasted acid-etched, sintered, and porous 3D-printed (681.00 µm average pore size). Fifteen 20-week-old nullipara female parasite-free New Zealand California white rabbits were used, employing the femoral condyle defect model and undertaking µ-CT analysis and pull-out testing eight weeks later. On µ-CT densitometric analysis, the solid sandblasted rod showed the highest new bone growth around the implant. Bone growth was higher inside the implants for the porous 3D-printed (54.00 ± 5.00 mm) than for the sintered (1.00 ± 0.05 mm) and zero for the sandblasted implants. In the pull-out test, there were no statistically significant differences in the ANOVA analysis between the sintered (900.00 N ± 310.00 N) and porous 3D-printed (700.00 N ± 220.00 N) implants. Such differences did exist between the sandblasted material (220.00 N ± 50.00 N) and the two other materials (sintered 0.002, porous 0.034). The porous 3D-printed and sintered implant pull-out strength were significantly better than that of the solid rod sandblasted implant. Still, there were no statistically significant differences between the first two.

摘要

未改性的Ti6Al4V可以实现骨整合,但有时需要提高这种能力。本研究旨在观察孔隙率对Ti6Al4V植入物骨整合的改善程度。评估了三种类型的Ti6Al4V圆柱形植入物(长度13.00毫米×直径5.00毫米):实心喷砂酸蚀型、烧结型和多孔3D打印型(平均孔径681.00微米)。使用了15只20周龄、未生育、无寄生虫的雌性新西兰加利福尼亚白兔,采用股骨髁缺损模型,并在八周后进行显微计算机断层扫描(µ-CT)分析和拔出试验。在µ-CT密度分析中,实心喷砂棒在植入物周围显示出最高的新骨生长。多孔3D打印植入物内部的骨生长(54.00±5.00毫米)高于烧结植入物(1.00±0.05毫米),而喷砂植入物内部的骨生长为零。在拔出试验中,烧结植入物(900.00牛±310.00牛)和多孔3D打印植入物(700.00牛±220.00牛)之间在方差分析中没有统计学上的显著差异。喷砂材料(220.00牛±50.00牛)与其他两种材料(烧结型,P = 0.002;多孔型,P = 0.034)之间确实存在这种差异。多孔3D打印和烧结植入物的拔出强度明显优于实心喷砂棒植入物。不过,前两者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6998/12072787/a49d8ca57a24/materials-18-02141-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验