Frosolini Andrea, Tuomi Lisa, Massarelli Olindo, Finizia Caterina, Benedetti Simone, Catarzi Lisa, Lovato Andrea, Gabriele Guido, Gennaro Paolo
Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 24;14(9):2949. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092949.
This study aimed to translate and validate the Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire-2 for Italian-speaking patients (I-GTQ2). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 200 participants. The translation process adhered to international standards. Patients completed the I-GTQ2 along with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate construct validity. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency and test-retest reliability (ICC). Known-group validity was also analyzed. The I-GTQ2 showed high reliability, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.61 to 0.94 and ICC between 0.79 and 0.96. Known-group comparisons confirmed discriminative validity, with significant differences between patients with and without trismus in jaw-related problems ( = 0.005, = 0.575) and large differences between patients and controls in most domains ( < 0.001, > 0.65) except for muscular tension. Convergent validity was supported by strong correlations between GTQ-2 domains and EORTC QLQ-C30 (e.g., = -0.54 for facial pain and global health status; = 0.64 for jaw-related problems and pain) as well as moderate correlations with HADS anxiety ( = 0.39-0.52) and depression ( = 0.37-0.46). The I-GTQ2 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the impact of trismus on the quality of life in Italian-speaking patients, and it is recommended for clinical and research use. Future studies should investigate its relationship with objective trismus measurements.
本研究旨在翻译并验证适用于意大利语患者的哥德堡牙关紧闭问卷-2(I-GTQ2)。对200名参与者进行了一项横断面研究。翻译过程遵循国际标准。患者完成了I-GTQ2以及欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS),以评估结构效度。使用内部一致性和重测信度(ICC)评估信度。还分析了已知组效度。I-GTQ2显示出高信度,Cronbach's α系数范围为0.61至0.94,ICC在0.79至0.96之间。已知组比较证实了区分效度,有牙关紧闭和无牙关紧闭的患者在颌骨相关问题上存在显著差异( = 0.005, = 0.575),除肌肉紧张外,患者与对照组在大多数领域存在较大差异( < 0.001, > 0.65)。GTQ-2各领域与EORTC QLQ-C30之间的强相关性(例如,面部疼痛与总体健康状况的 = -0.54;颌骨相关问题与疼痛的 = 0.64)以及与HADS焦虑( = 0.39 - 0.52)和抑郁( = 0.37 - 0.46)的中度相关性支持了收敛效度。I-GTQ2是评估牙关紧闭对意大利语患者生活质量影响的可靠且有效的工具,建议用于临床和研究。未来的研究应调查其与客观牙关紧闭测量的关系。