Suppr超能文献

社会基因组多基因评分的法律不确定性

The Legal Uncertainties of Sociogenomic Polygenic Scores.

作者信息

Callier Shawneequa, Prince Anya E R

出版信息

Harv J Law Technol. 2024;38(2 Symposium):553-576.

Abstract

Genomics may increasingly be used to predict associations with social traits through a new field called sociogenomics. This approach includes developing genetic 'scores' to identify associations with individuals' traits like educational attainment, feelings of loneliness, aggressive behavior, and criminality. Companies are already testing embryos to select for some of these traits, and these scores could be adopted by industries and settings beyond commercialized reproductive genetic testing services. The nature of the scores raises concerns about the potential dangers of a passive regulatory approach. Although supporters argue that sociogenomic polygenic scores could help mediate social inequality, there are worries that their implementation into society could be discriminatory and inequitable. Without adequate safeguards, it could have severe consequences for adults using IVF services, students, health insurance beneficiaries, employees, and others in the future. While existing legal structures are in place to regulate medical genetic information, these protections have their own flaws, and further, do not clearly extend to polygenic scores. Policymakers must therefore consider the potential harms of sociogenomic polygenic scores, and how to maximize any benefits.

摘要

通过一个名为社会基因组学的新领域,基因组学可能会越来越多地用于预测与社会特征的关联。这种方法包括开发基因“分数”,以确定与个人特征的关联,如受教育程度、孤独感、攻击性行为和犯罪行为。公司已经在对胚胎进行检测,以筛选其中一些特征,而且这些分数可能会被商业化生殖基因检测服务以外的行业和机构采用。这些分数的性质引发了人们对被动监管方式潜在危险的担忧。尽管支持者认为社会基因组多基因分数有助于调节社会不平等,但人们担心将其应用于社会可能会具有歧视性和不公平性。如果没有充分的保障措施,它可能会在未来对使用试管婴儿服务的成年人、学生、医疗保险受益人、员工及其他人群产生严重后果。虽然现有的法律结构用于监管医学遗传信息,但这些保护措施本身存在缺陷,而且进一步讲,并不明确适用于多基因分数。因此,政策制定者必须考虑社会基因组多基因分数的潜在危害,以及如何将任何益处最大化。

相似文献

1
The Legal Uncertainties of Sociogenomic Polygenic Scores.
Harv J Law Technol. 2024;38(2 Symposium):553-576.
5
Three models for the regulation of polygenic scores in reproduction.
J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan 18;47(12):e91. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106588.
7
Genetic analysis of social-class mobility in five longitudinal studies.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 31;115(31):E7275-E7284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801238115. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Pygmalion in the Genes? On the potentially negative impacts of polygenic scores for educational attainment.
Soc Psychol Educ. 2021;24:789-808. doi: 10.1007/s11218-021-09632-z. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
9
Can education be personalised using pupils' genetic data?
Elife. 2020 Mar 10;9:e49962. doi: 10.7554/eLife.49962.

本文引用的文献

2
Managing differential performance of polygenic risk scores across groups: Real-world experience of the eMERGE Network.
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Jun 6;111(6):999-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.04.005. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
3
Principles and methods for transferring polygenic risk scores across global populations.
Nat Rev Genet. 2024 Jan;25(1):8-25. doi: 10.1038/s41576-023-00637-2. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
4
Addressing the ethical and societal challenges posed by genome-wide association studies of behavioral and brain-related traits.
Nat Neurosci. 2023 Jun;26(6):932-941. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01333-4. Epub 2023 May 22.
5
Wrestling with Social and Behavioral Genomics: Risks, Potential Benefits, and Ethical Responsibility.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2023 Mar;53 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2-S49. doi: 10.1002/hast.1477.
6
The Slippery Slope of Prenatal Testing for Social Traits.
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Mar;23(3):36-38. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2169395.
7
Public views on polygenic screening of embryos.
Science. 2023 Feb 10;379(6632):541-543. doi: 10.1126/science.ade1083. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
9
On genetics and justice: A reply to Coop and Przeworski ().
Evolution. 2022 Oct;76(10):2469-2474. doi: 10.1111/evo.14589. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验