Callier Shawneequa, Prince Anya E R
Harv J Law Technol. 2024;38(2 Symposium):553-576.
Genomics may increasingly be used to predict associations with social traits through a new field called sociogenomics. This approach includes developing genetic 'scores' to identify associations with individuals' traits like educational attainment, feelings of loneliness, aggressive behavior, and criminality. Companies are already testing embryos to select for some of these traits, and these scores could be adopted by industries and settings beyond commercialized reproductive genetic testing services. The nature of the scores raises concerns about the potential dangers of a passive regulatory approach. Although supporters argue that sociogenomic polygenic scores could help mediate social inequality, there are worries that their implementation into society could be discriminatory and inequitable. Without adequate safeguards, it could have severe consequences for adults using IVF services, students, health insurance beneficiaries, employees, and others in the future. While existing legal structures are in place to regulate medical genetic information, these protections have their own flaws, and further, do not clearly extend to polygenic scores. Policymakers must therefore consider the potential harms of sociogenomic polygenic scores, and how to maximize any benefits.
通过一个名为社会基因组学的新领域,基因组学可能会越来越多地用于预测与社会特征的关联。这种方法包括开发基因“分数”,以确定与个人特征的关联,如受教育程度、孤独感、攻击性行为和犯罪行为。公司已经在对胚胎进行检测,以筛选其中一些特征,而且这些分数可能会被商业化生殖基因检测服务以外的行业和机构采用。这些分数的性质引发了人们对被动监管方式潜在危险的担忧。尽管支持者认为社会基因组多基因分数有助于调节社会不平等,但人们担心将其应用于社会可能会具有歧视性和不公平性。如果没有充分的保障措施,它可能会在未来对使用试管婴儿服务的成年人、学生、医疗保险受益人、员工及其他人群产生严重后果。虽然现有的法律结构用于监管医学遗传信息,但这些保护措施本身存在缺陷,而且进一步讲,并不明确适用于多基因分数。因此,政策制定者必须考虑社会基因组多基因分数的潜在危害,以及如何将任何益处最大化。