1Collaborative Initiative Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, college of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003 China.
2Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003 China.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Mar 6;8:52. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x. eCollection 2019.
We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant bloodstream infection (CRAB-BSI).
CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy between January 2012 and December 2017 was enrolled, and strict exclusion criteria were followed. The 28-day mortality of patients was analyzed. The impact of cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy on prognosis was evaluated using Cox multivariate regression analysis. The 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy and cefoperazone/sulbactam-based combination therapy was also compared.
Three hundred forty eight patients with CRAB-BSI were enrolled in the study. Two hundred ten patients were included after applying the exclusion criteria. Of these, 135 patients received tigecycline therapy and 75 patients received cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy. The 28-day mortality of patients in the latter group was, significantly lower than that of the tigecycline group [29.3% vs. 51.9%; = 0.001]. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy exerted a protective effect on the prognosis of patients [hazard ratio 0.566, 95% confidence interval (0.342-0.940); = 0.028]. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis indicated that the 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy was lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy, but the difference was not significant (22.2% vs. 40%; = 0.074). However, the mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin was significantly lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy ( = 0.048).
Patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy had a better clinical outcome. The mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin seems to be the lowest.
我们回顾性分析了替加环素和头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗对耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科血流感染(CRAB-BSI)患者预后的影响。
纳入 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受替加环素或头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗的 CRAB-BSI 患者,并遵循严格的排除标准。分析患者 28 天死亡率。采用 Cox 多因素回归分析评估头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗对预后的影响。比较接受头孢哌酮/舒巴坦单药和头孢哌酮/舒巴坦联合治疗的患者 28 天死亡率。
本研究纳入了 348 例 CRAB-BSI 患者,应用排除标准后纳入了 210 例患者。其中 135 例患者接受了替加环素治疗,75 例患者接受了头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗。后者组的 28 天死亡率明显低于替加环素组[29.3%比 51.9%; = 0.001]。Cox 多因素回归分析显示,头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗对患者预后有保护作用[风险比 0.566,95%置信区间(0.342-0.940); = 0.028]。Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线分析表明,接受头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗的患者 28 天死亡率低于接受头孢哌酮/舒巴坦单药治疗的患者,但差异无统计学意义[22.2%比 40%; = 0.074]。然而,接受头孢哌酮/舒巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁联合治疗的患者死亡率明显低于接受头孢哌酮/舒巴坦单药治疗的患者( = 0.048)。
接受头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗的患者临床结局更好。接受头孢哌酮/舒巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁联合治疗的患者死亡率似乎最低。