Sanches Ana Carla Barletta, Azevedo Juliana Santos de Jesus, Pimenta-Barros Liliana Aparecida, Freitas Valéria Souza, Camisasca Danielle Resende, Martins Gabriela Botelho
Postgraduate Program in Interactive Processes of Organs and Systems of the Institute of Health Sciences of the Federal University of Bahia, Bahia, Brazil.
PhD in Oral Pathology from the University of São Paulo, Full Professor at the Federal University of Espírito Santo, Professor of the Postgraduate Program in Dental Sciences at the Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Head Neck Pathol. 2025 May 14;19(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s12105-025-01791-1.
Oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) are considered potentially malignant oral disorders, presenting with similar clinical and histopathological manifestations that make differential diagnosis difficult and reinforce the need for new techniques for their evaluation.
This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of OLP and OLL.
This retrospective cross-sectional study was based on 30 histological sections of incisional biopsies of OLP and OLL stained with hematoxylin-eosin for the analysis of morphological parameters, such as keratosis, acanthosis, inflammatory infiltrate band, eosinophilic band, degeneration of the basal layer, involvement of the epithelium-chorion interface, and degree of subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate; and morphometric parameters, such as keratin thickness, distance from the basal layer to the epithelial surface, and thickness of the inflammatory infiltrate band. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables and injury types. The t-test was used to compare morphometric variables between the two types of injury.
There was no significant association between the type of lesion and the clinical characteristics of the patients (p > 0.05). The degree of dysplasia, used as an inclusion criterion, was associated with lesion type (p = 0.0003). There were no significant differences between the morphometric variables evaluated for the two types of lesions (p > 0.05).
Based on the methodology used and the sample established for this study, there were clinical and histomorphometric similarities between OLP and OLL. This justifies further discussion on whether these lesions are a spectrum of presentations of the same condition or truly distinct conditions.
口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)和口腔苔藓样病变(OLL)被认为是潜在恶性口腔疾病,它们具有相似的临床和组织病理学表现,这使得鉴别诊断困难,并凸显了采用新技术进行评估的必要性。
本研究旨在比较OLP和OLL的组织形态计量学特征。
本回顾性横断面研究基于30例OLP和OLL切开活检的组织学切片,用苏木精-伊红染色,以分析形态学参数,如角化、棘层增厚、炎症浸润带、嗜酸性带、基底层变性、上皮-绒毛膜界面受累情况以及上皮下炎症浸润程度;以及形态计量学参数,如角质厚度、从基底层到上皮表面的距离和炎症浸润带厚度。采用卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验比较分类变量和损伤类型。采用t检验比较两种损伤类型之间的形态计量学变量。
病变类型与患者临床特征之间无显著关联(p>0.05)。用作纳入标准的发育异常程度与病变类型相关(p=0.0003)。两种病变类型评估的形态计量学变量之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。
基于本研究使用的方法和建立的样本,OLP和OLL之间存在临床和组织形态计量学相似性。这证明有必要进一步讨论这些病变是同一疾病的不同表现形式,还是真正不同的疾病。