Sealy-Jefferson Shawnita, Ross Loretta J, Anderson-Mays Tamika, Sanders Kyra, Oneal Roquesha, Booth JoAnn M, Brown Jacqueline, Mishra Swati, Ford Tiffany N, Barnett Kierra, Chettri Shibani, Bosah Chinenye, Hoang Mindy, Bellamy Scarlett
Ohio State University, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Smith College, Northampton, USA.
J Urban Health. 2025 May 14. doi: 10.1007/s11524-025-00977-w.
Few existing data sources quantify the magnitude of court-ordered and illegal residential evictions, among historically marginalized groups. We describe the Social Epidemiology to Combat Unjust Residential Evictions (SECURE) Study (2021-2024; n = 1,428; 91.1% response rate) methodology and participant characteristics. Univariable and multivariable statistics including Spearman correlations were used to describe data. Unadjusted and adjusted modified Poisson regression with robust error variance estimated relative risk (RR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for associations between five eviction measures and self-rated health (SRH), and self-rated health relative to most similarly aged peers (RSRH). A quarter of the participants reported experiencing an eviction as a child (n = 354). Over half of the study sample reported ever experiencing a court-ordered (n = 432) and/or an illegal eviction (n = 360). In the past 2 years, 15.2% of the sample reported experiencing a court-ordered (n = 122) and/or illegal eviction (n = 95). Eviction during childhood, and ever experiencing both court-ordered and/or illegal eviction was associated with between 12 and 17% higher risk of poor SRH, and childhood eviction and ever experiencing illegal eviction was associated with between 34 and 37% higher risk of worse RSRH among reproductive age Black women. More community-partnered research using participatory action research methods are needed to understand and intervene upon the health impacts of residential evictions among disproportionately impacted groups.
在历史上处于边缘地位的群体中,现有的数据来源很少能对法院下令的和非法的住宅驱逐规模进行量化。我们描述了“社会流行病学抗击不公正住宅驱逐(SECURE)研究”(2021年至2024年;n = 1428;回应率91.1%)的方法和参与者特征。使用包括斯皮尔曼相关性在内的单变量和多变量统计来描述数据。采用稳健误差方差的未调整和调整后的修正泊松回归估计了五种驱逐措施与自评健康(SRH)以及相对于年龄最相近的同龄人自评健康(RSRH)之间关联的相对风险(RR)和相关的95%置信区间(95%CI)。四分之一的参与者报告称童年时经历过驱逐(n = 354)。超过一半的研究样本报告曾经历过法院下令的驱逐(n = 432)和/或非法驱逐(n = 360)。在过去两年中,15.2%的样本报告经历过法院下令的驱逐(n = 122)和/或非法驱逐(n = 95)。童年时期的驱逐以及曾经历过法院下令的和/或非法驱逐与自评健康状况不佳的风险高12%至17%相关,童年时期的驱逐以及曾经历过非法驱逐与育龄黑人女性中自评健康相对于同龄人更差的风险高34%至37%相关。需要更多采用参与式行动研究方法的社区合作研究,以了解并干预住宅驱逐对受影响尤为严重群体的健康影响。