• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能、增强现实、大数据和物联网时代的情境相关隐私担忧与隐私悖论探索:系统综述

Context-Contingent Privacy Concerns and Exploration of the Privacy Paradox in the Age of AI, Augmented Reality, Big Data, and the Internet of Things: Systematic Review.

作者信息

Herriger Christian, Merlo Omar, Eisingerich Andreas B, Arigayota Annisa Rizkia

机构信息

Imperial Business School, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 14;27:e71951. doi: 10.2196/71951.

DOI:10.2196/71951
PMID:40367513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12120372/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite extensive research into technology users' privacy concerns, a critical gap remains in understanding why individuals adopt different standards for data protection across contexts. The rise of advanced technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), augmented reality (AR), and big data has created rapidly evolving and complex privacy landscapes. However, privacy is often treated as a static construct, failing to reflect the fluid, context-dependent nature of user concerns. This oversimplification has led to fragmented research, inconsistent findings, and limited capacity to address the nuanced challenges posed by these technologies. Understanding these dynamics is especially crucial in fields such as digital health and informatics, where sensitive data and user trust are central to adoption and ethical innovation.

OBJECTIVE

This study synthesized existing research on privacy behaviors in emerging technologies, focusing on IoT, AI, AR, and big data. Its primary objectives were to identify the psychological antecedents, outcomes, and theoretical frameworks explaining privacy behavior, and to assess whether insights from traditional online privacy literature, such as e-commerce and social networking, apply to these advanced technologies. It also advocates a context-dependent approach to understanding privacy.

METHODS

A systematic review of 179 studies synthesized psychological antecedents, outcomes, and theoretical frameworks related to privacy behaviors in emerging technologies. Following established guidelines and using leading research databases such as ScienceDirect (Elsevier), SAGE, and EBSCO, studies were screened for relevance to privacy behaviors, focus on emerging technologies, and empirical grounding. Methodological details were analyzed to assess the applicability of traditional privacy findings from e-commerce and social networking to today's advanced technologies.

RESULTS

The systematic review revealed key gaps in the privacy literature on emerging technologies, such as IoT, AI, AR, and big data. Contextual factors, such as data sensitivity, recipient transparency, and transmission principles, were often overlooked, despite their critical role in shaping privacy concerns and behaviors. The findings also showed that theories developed for traditional technologies often fall short in addressing the complexities of modern contexts. By synthesizing psychological antecedents, behavioral outcomes, and theoretical frameworks, this study underscores the need for a context-contingent approach to privacy research.

CONCLUSIONS

This study advances understanding of user privacy by emphasizing the critical role of context in data sharing, particularly amid ubiquitous and emerging health technologies. The findings challenge static views of privacy and highlight the need for tailored frameworks that reflect dynamic, context-dependent behaviors. Practical implications include guiding health care providers, policy makers, and technology developers toward context-sensitive strategies that build trust, enhance data protection, and support ethical digital health innovation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD420251037954; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251037954.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8a/12120372/a2a8bc33025f/jmir_v27i1e71951_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8a/12120372/42a67be8bc14/jmir_v27i1e71951_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8a/12120372/0c2a7900c561/jmir_v27i1e71951_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8a/12120372/a2a8bc33025f/jmir_v27i1e71951_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8a/12120372/42a67be8bc14/jmir_v27i1e71951_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8a/12120372/0c2a7900c561/jmir_v27i1e71951_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8a/12120372/a2a8bc33025f/jmir_v27i1e71951_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

尽管对技术用户的隐私担忧进行了广泛研究,但在理解为何个人在不同情境下采用不同数据保护标准方面仍存在关键差距。物联网(IoT)、人工智能(AI)、增强现实(AR)和大数据等先进技术的兴起创造了迅速演变且复杂的隐私格局。然而,隐私通常被视为一个静态概念,未能反映用户担忧的动态、情境依赖性质。这种过度简化导致了研究碎片化、结果不一致,以及应对这些技术带来的细微挑战的能力有限。在数字健康和信息学等领域,理解这些动态尤其关键,因为敏感数据和用户信任是采用和道德创新的核心。

目的

本研究综合了关于新兴技术中隐私行为的现有研究,重点关注物联网、人工智能、增强现实和大数据。其主要目标是确定解释隐私行为的心理前因、结果和理论框架,并评估传统在线隐私文献(如电子商务和社交网络)中的见解是否适用于这些先进技术。它还倡导采用情境依赖的方法来理解隐私。

方法

对179项研究进行系统综述,综合了与新兴技术中隐私行为相关的心理前因、结果和理论框架。按照既定指南并使用ScienceDirect(爱思唯尔)、SAGE和EBSCO等领先研究数据库,筛选与隐私行为相关、关注新兴技术且有实证依据的研究。分析方法细节以评估电子商务和社交网络中传统隐私研究结果对当今先进技术的适用性。

结果

系统综述揭示了新兴技术(如物联网、人工智能、增强现实和大数据)隐私文献中的关键差距。尽管数据敏感性、接收者透明度和传输原则等情境因素在塑造隐私担忧和行为方面起着关键作用,但它们常常被忽视。研究结果还表明,为传统技术开发的理论往往不足以应对现代情境的复杂性。通过综合心理前因、行为结果和理论框架,本研究强调了隐私研究采用情境依存方法的必要性。

结论

本研究通过强调情境在数据共享中的关键作用,特别是在无处不在的新兴健康技术背景下,推进了对用户隐私的理解。研究结果挑战了对隐私的静态观点,并强调需要反映动态、情境依赖行为的定制框架。实际意义包括指导医疗保健提供者、政策制定者和技术开发者制定情境敏感策略,以建立信任、加强数据保护并支持符合道德的数字健康创新。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD420251037954;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251037954

相似文献

1
Context-Contingent Privacy Concerns and Exploration of the Privacy Paradox in the Age of AI, Augmented Reality, Big Data, and the Internet of Things: Systematic Review.人工智能、增强现实、大数据和物联网时代的情境相关隐私担忧与隐私悖论探索:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 14;27:e71951. doi: 10.2196/71951.
2
Data stewardship and curation practices in AI-based genomics and automated microscopy image analysis for high-throughput screening studies: promoting robust and ethical AI applications.基于人工智能的基因组学和用于高通量筛选研究的自动显微镜图像分析中的数据管理与整理实践:推动可靠且符合伦理的人工智能应用。
Hum Genomics. 2025 Feb 23;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00716-x.
3
Challenges and Opportunities for Data Sharing Related to Artificial Intelligence Tools in Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review and Case Study From Thailand.低收入和中等收入国家医疗保健领域与人工智能工具相关的数据共享面临的挑战与机遇:系统评价及来自泰国的案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 4;27:e58338. doi: 10.2196/58338.
4
Ambient Assisted Living: Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Models, Domains, Technology, and Concerns.环境辅助生活:人工智能模型、领域、技术和关注点的范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 4;24(11):e36553. doi: 10.2196/36553.
5
Elevating e-government: Unleashing the power of AI and IoT for enhanced public services.提升电子政务:释放人工智能和物联网的力量以增强公共服务。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 20;10(23):e40591. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40591. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
6
AI-Enabled IoT for Food Computing: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions.用于食品计算的人工智能物联网:挑战、机遇与未来方向。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;25(7):2147. doi: 10.3390/s25072147.
7
Assessing AI adoption in developing country academia: A trust and privacy-augmented UTAUT framework.评估发展中国家学术界对人工智能的采用情况:一个信任与隐私增强的UTAUT框架。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 10;10(18):e37569. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37569. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
8
Digital transformation in healthcare management: from Artificial Intelligence to blockchain.医疗管理中的数字转型:从人工智能到区块链。
Wiad Lek. 2025;78(3):578-583. doi: 10.36740/WLek/202445.
9
An analytic research and review of the literature on practice of artificial intelligence in healthcare.关于人工智能在医疗保健领域应用的文献分析研究与综述。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 14;30(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02603-6.
10
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL PRACTICE: REGULATIVE ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES.人工智能在医学实践中的应用:监管问题与展望。
Wiad Lek. 2020;73(12 cz 2):2722-2727.

引用本文的文献

1
Mitigating the Negative Effects of Internet Browsing on Young People's Resilience and Outlook on Life Through Classic Grimms' Fairy Tales: Exploratory Randomized Controlled Study.通过经典格林童话减轻网络浏览对年轻人恢复力和人生观的负面影响:探索性随机对照研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 6;9:e76770. doi: 10.2196/76770.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Large Language Model-Based Offerings on the Well-Being of Students: Qualitative Study.基于大语言模型的产品对学生幸福感的影响:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 27;8:e64081. doi: 10.2196/64081.
2
Open-World Games' Affordance of Cognitive Escapism, Relaxation, and Mental Well-Being Among Postgraduate Students: Mixed Methods Study.开放世界游戏对研究生认知逃避、放松及心理健康的作用:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 17;26:e63760. doi: 10.2196/63760.
3
Data Ownership in the AI-Powered Integrative Health Care Landscape.
人工智能驱动的整合式医疗保健领域的数据所有权。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Nov 19;12:e57754. doi: 10.2196/57754.
4
Using Conversational AI to Facilitate Mental Health Assessments and Improve Clinical Efficiency Within Psychotherapy Services: Real-World Observational Study.利用对话式人工智能促进心理健康评估并提高心理治疗服务中的临床效率:现实世界观察性研究
JMIR AI. 2023 Dec 13;2:e44358. doi: 10.2196/44358.
5
Patients' Perspectives on the Data Confidentiality, Privacy, and Security of mHealth Apps: Systematic Review.患者对移动医疗应用程序的数据保密性、隐私性和安全性的看法:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 31;26:e50715. doi: 10.2196/50715.
6
Data Management and Privacy Policy of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps: Systematic Review and Content Analysis.COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的数据管理和隐私政策:系统评价和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jul 12;10(7):e35195. doi: 10.2196/35195.
7
Artificial Intelligence Is Safer for My Privacy: Interplay Between Types of Personal Information and Agents on Perceived Privacy Risk and Concerns.人工智能更能保护我的隐私:个人信息类型和代理在感知隐私风险和担忧方面的相互作用。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Feb;25(2):118-123. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2021.0076. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
8
Patient Perceptions on Data Sharing and Applying Artificial Intelligence to Health Care Data: Cross-sectional Survey.患者对数据共享和将人工智能应用于医疗保健数据的看法:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 26;23(8):e26162. doi: 10.2196/26162.
9
The Role of Data Type and Recipient in Individuals' Perspectives on Sharing Passively Collected Smartphone Data for Mental Health: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.数据类型和接收者在个体对被动收集的智能手机数据用于心理健康共享的观点中的作用:横断面问卷调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 5;7(4):e12578. doi: 10.2196/12578.
10
How an Environment of Stress and Social Risk Shapes Student Engagement With Social Media as Potential Digital Learning Platforms: Qualitative Study.压力与社会风险环境如何塑造学生对作为潜在数字学习平台的社交媒体的参与度:定性研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2018 Jul 13;4(2):e10069. doi: 10.2196/10069.