• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耳廓裂伤一期缝合后的手术效果。

Surgical outcome following primary closure of auricular lacerations.

作者信息

Zwemstra Max, Geerse Simon, de Wolf Maarten, Ebbens Fenna, Smits Cas, van Spronsen Erik

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09453-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-025-09453-2
PMID:40369216
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the aesthetic outcomes of primary closure of auricle lacerations in the emergency department.

METHODS

In this prospective case study in our tertiary referral center we included all patients with an auricular laceration without complete avulsion. Wound treatment involved thorough cleaning and primary closure. Photos of the auricle were taken at various stages for evaluation. To evaluate the achieved results after 3 months, a success classification system with four classes was developed: (1) full success, no irregularities, (2) partial success, only minor irregularities, (3a) unsuccessful, major irregularities or (3b) unsuccessful, (partial) necrosis.

RESULTS

Most patients demonstrated successful outcomes (60.7% full success and 32.1% partial success), with helical involvement being associated with inferior results. The interobserver percent agreement of the classification system was 88%. The Fleiss' kappa coefficient was 0.570, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Primary closure of ear lacerations results in a high success rate. We have introduced a revised classification system to qualify the success of treatment of the auricle laceration. Involvement of the helix is correlated with inferior surgical results three months after surgical closure. Trial registration number and date of registration: reference number W21_387 # 21.432, September 9, 2021.

摘要

目的

评估急诊科耳廓裂伤一期缝合的美学效果。

方法

在我们的三级转诊中心进行的这项前瞻性病例研究中,纳入了所有耳廓裂伤但未完全撕脱的患者。伤口处理包括彻底清洁和一期缝合。在不同阶段拍摄耳廓照片以进行评估。为了评估3个月后的治疗效果,制定了一个分为四类的成功分类系统:(1)完全成功,无畸形;(2)部分成功,仅有轻微畸形;(3a)不成功,有严重畸形或(3b)不成功,(部分)坏死。

结果

大多数患者治疗效果成功(60.7%完全成功,32.1%部分成功),耳廓螺旋缘受累的患者治疗效果较差。分类系统的观察者间百分比一致性为88%。Fleiss卡方系数为0.570,p < 0.001。

结论

耳廓裂伤一期缝合成功率高。我们引入了一种修订的分类系统来评估耳廓裂伤治疗的成功程度。耳廓螺旋缘受累与手术缝合三个月后的手术效果较差相关。试验注册号和注册日期:参考编号W21_387 # 21.432,2021年9月9日。

相似文献

1
Surgical outcome following primary closure of auricular lacerations.耳廓裂伤一期缝合后的手术效果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09453-2.
2
Tissue adhesives for simple traumatic lacerations.用于简单外伤性撕裂伤的组织粘合剂。
J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):222-4. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.222.
3
Trauma Management of the Auricle.耳廓的创伤处理
Facial Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;31(4):382-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562882. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
4
Emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds with immediate primary closure: a prospective randomized trial study.急诊即时一期缝合处理犬咬伤面部撕裂伤:一项前瞻性随机试验研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2013;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-13-S1-S2. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
5
Efficacy of pain control with topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children: a randomized controlled trial.利多卡因-肾上腺素-丁卡因局部麻醉在儿童组织黏合伤口修复术中的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验。
CMAJ. 2013 Sep 17;185(13):E629-34. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130269. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
6
To stitch or not to stitch: A case review: Auricular lacerations involving cartilage management in the emergency department.缝还是不缝:病例回顾:急诊科中涉及软骨处理的耳廓撕裂伤
Australas Emerg Care. 2018 May;21(2):75-79. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
7
Ultrasound-guided Greater Auricular Nerve Block for Emergency Department Ear Laceration and Ear Abscess Drainage.超声引导下耳大神经阻滞用于急诊科耳部裂伤和耳脓肿引流
J Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):651-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
8
Noninvasive Wound Closure in the Emergency Department.急诊科的无创伤口闭合术。
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2020 Jan/Mar;42(1):48-53. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000282.
9
A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures.一项随机对照试验,比较用可吸收的普通肠线与不可吸收的尼龙缝线修复小儿外伤性撕裂伤的长期美容效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jul;11(7):730-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.029.
10
Epidemiology, Incidence of Infection, and Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Traumatic Ear Lacerations.小儿外伤性耳部撕裂伤的流行病学、感染发生率及抗生素使用情况
Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Jun 1;94(6):653-657. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004325.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisited Arterial Supply of the Anterior Ear.重新审视前耳的动脉供应。
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Apr 1;88(4):446-450. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002936.
2
Reconstructive Options for Auricular Trauma.耳廓创伤的重建选择。
Facial Plast Surg. 2021 Aug;37(4):510-515. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726465. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
3
Can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery?我们能否预测耳道手术后声音主观质量评估的改变?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Sep;277(9):2455-2462. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05971-3. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
4
Trauma in elderly patients: a study of prevalence, comorbidities and gender differences.老年患者的创伤:患病率、合并症及性别差异研究
G Chir. 2018 Jan-Feb;39(1):35-40. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.1.035.
5
Management of acute soft tissue injury to the auricle.耳廓急性软组织损伤的处理
Facial Plast Surg. 2010 Dec;26(6):445-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267718. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
6
The psychosocial consequences of reconstruction of severe ear defects or third-degree microtia with rib cartilage.严重耳部缺损或三度小耳畸形采用肋软骨重建的心理社会后果。
Aesthet Surg J. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(4):404-11. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.06.003.
7
[Epidemiology of auricular trauma].[耳廓外伤的流行病学]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2007 Apr;39(2):98-102. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965136.
8
A comparison of ear reattachment methods: a review of 25 years since Pennington.耳部再植方法的比较:自彭宁顿以来25年的回顾
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Nov;118(6):1358-1364. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000239539.98956.b0.
9
MANAGEMENT OF THE INJURED EAR.受伤耳朵的处理
Am J Surg. 1963 Oct;106:678-84. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(63)90077-1.
10
Relearning sound localization with new ears.用新耳朵重新学习声音定位。
Nat Neurosci. 1998 Sep;1(5):417-21. doi: 10.1038/1633.