• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量护理工作中的诚信:量表的开发与验证。

Measuring honesty in nursing: scale development and validation.

作者信息

Mohammadi Mohammad Mehdi, Naghibzadeh Amirhossein, Mosafer Hadis, Mohammadi Mohammad

机构信息

Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 May 14;24(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03163-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-03163-0
PMID:40369564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12079846/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Honesty is considered a desirable trait that can impact happiness and job performance. The clinical environment can present ethical challenges for nurses. A lack of honesty can lead to significant issues for both nurses and patients. Existing tools for measuring honesty have limitations and do not focus specifically on nurses. This study aimed to design and psychometrically evaluate a scale to measure honesty among nurses.

METHODS

This methodological study involved the design and validation of an honesty measurement tool for nurses. The study employed an inductive-deductive approach to generate items. The face (10 nurses), content (10 nursing experts), and construct validity (320 hospital nurses) of the scale were assessed, along with reliability using internal consistency and stability methods. The Item Impact Method was used for quantitative face validity determination. Content validity was assessed using qualitative and quantitative methods, with the participation of researchers and nursing experts. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency, and the test-retest method and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used to assess reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to assess construct validity.

RESULTS

The study resulted in an 8-item tool with two dimensions: behavioral honesty and verbal honesty. The tool explained 51.034% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha for the entire scale was 0.823, and McDonald's omega was 0.898. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was reported as 0.918, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.827 to 0.961.

CONCLUSION

The developed tool is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring honesty among nurses. This study contributes to the field by providing a tool to measure honesty in nurses. The tool's scoring system effectively distinguishes between different levels of honesty in nursing practice, with elevated scores reflecting greater adherence to honest professional conduct. This tool can be used by managers and organizational decision-makers to enhance the quality of management planning.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

诚实被视为一种可取的特质,会影响幸福感和工作表现。临床环境可能给护士带来伦理挑战。缺乏诚实会给护士和患者都带来重大问题。现有的测量诚实的工具存在局限性,且未专门针对护士。本研究旨在设计并从心理测量学角度评估一种用于测量护士诚实度的量表。

方法

本方法学研究涉及为护士设计和验证一种诚实度测量工具。该研究采用归纳 - 演绎法生成条目。评估了量表的表面效度(10名护士)、内容效度(10名护理专家)和结构效度(320名医院护士),并使用内部一致性和稳定性方法评估信度。条目影响法用于定量表面效度测定。内容效度采用定性和定量方法评估,研究人员和护理专家参与其中。Cronbach's α用于评估内部一致性,重测法和组内相关系数(ICC)用于评估信度。探索性因素分析(EFA)用于评估结构效度。

结果

该研究得出一个包含8个条目的工具,有两个维度:行为诚实和言语诚实。该工具解释了总方差的51.034%。整个量表的Cronbach's α为0.823,McDonald's ω为0.898。组内相关系数(ICC)报告为0.918,95%置信区间为0.827至0.961。

结论

所开发的工具是一种可靠且有效的测量护士诚实度的工具。本研究通过提供一种测量护士诚实度的工具为该领域做出了贡献。该工具的评分系统能有效区分护理实践中不同程度的诚实,分数越高表明越坚持诚实的专业行为。管理者和组织决策者可使用此工具来提高管理规划质量。

临床试验编号

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74b/12079846/ebe0db6b7f9c/12912_2025_3163_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74b/12079846/ebe0db6b7f9c/12912_2025_3163_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74b/12079846/ebe0db6b7f9c/12912_2025_3163_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring honesty in nursing: scale development and validation.测量护理工作中的诚信:量表的开发与验证。
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 14;24(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03163-0.
2
Development and Psychometric Properties of Ethical Competence Questionnaire for Nursing Students.护理专业学生伦理能力问卷的编制与心理测量学特性
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;8(5):e70750. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70750. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Assessment of the validity and reliability of the nurses' professional values scale-revised in Persian version among nursing students.评估波斯语版修订后的护士职业价值观量表在护理专业学生中的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 25;25(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06677-y.
4
Development and validation of an instrument to measure pediatric nurses' adherence to ethical codes.研制并验证一种用于测量儿科护士对伦理规范遵循程度的工具。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Feb 25;23(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00753-4.
5
Psychometric properties of the educational leadership scale for nursing students.护理专业学生教育领导力量表的心理测量学特性
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 6;25(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07269-6.
6
Nurses' perception of talent management scale (NPTMS): development, validation and psychometric properties.护士对人才管理量表(NPTMS)的认知:开发、验证及心理测量特性
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 3;24(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02882-8.
7
Translation and validation of the Persian version of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale (NPRS) for new graduate nurses.新毕业护士护理实践准备量表(NPRS)波斯语版本的翻译与验证
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 16;23(1):760. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02434-6.
8
The scale of attitudes toward workplace sexual harassment disclosure: development and validation among Iranian nurses.职场性骚扰举报态度量表:在伊朗护士群体中的编制与验证
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 25;24(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02952-x.
9
Designing and psychometric evaluation of safe nursing care instrument in intensive care units.重症监护病房安全护理措施量表的设计与心理测量学评估
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 10;23(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02322-z.
10
Development and validation of a new non-disease-specific survey tool to assess self-reported adherence to medication.一种用于评估自我报告的药物依从性的新型非疾病特异性调查工具的开发与验证。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Dec 7;13:981368. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.981368. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Time to re-envisage integrity among nurse leaders.重新审视护理领导者的诚信问题。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Oct;30(7):2236-2240. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13557. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
2
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Face Validity of the Functional Mobility Assessment into Brazilian Portuguese.功能性活动能力评估的跨文化适应及表面效度:巴西葡萄牙语版本
Occup Ther Int. 2020 Feb 7;2020:8150718. doi: 10.1155/2020/8150718. eCollection 2020.
3
Be Happy, Be Honest: The Role of Self-Control, Self-Beliefs, and Satisfaction with Life in Honest Behavior.
要快乐,要诚实:自我控制、自我信念和生活满意度在诚实行为中的作用。
J Relig Health. 2021 Apr;60(2):1015-1028. doi: 10.1007/s10943-019-00956-x.
4
The development and validation of the Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire for Nursing Students.护理学生伦理敏感性问卷的编制与验证。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1625-8.
5
Health, honesty and happiness: Authenticity and anonymity in social media participation of individuals with multiple sclerosis.健康、诚实和幸福:多发性硬化症患者在社交媒体参与中的真实性和匿名性。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:121-126. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
6
Nurses' integrity and coping strategies: An integrative review.护士的诚信与应对策略:综合述评。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Mar;28(5-6):733-744. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14702. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
7
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
8
The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL).内容和表面有效性在工具开发中的重要性:从服务使用者在开发“恢复生活质量量表”(ReQoL)时吸取的经验教训。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1893-1902. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1847-y. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
9
Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity.评价用于估计内容效度的方法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Feb;15(2):214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
10
Integrity in nursing students: A concept analysis.护理专业学生的诚信:一项概念分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 31.