Karabicak Gul Oznur, Alkan Demetoğlu Göknil, Ozkan Gokhan, Gunaydin Gurkan, Önal Aykar Sercan, Günaydın Özge Ece
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.
Faculty of Dentistry, Departmant of Prosthodontics, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.
J Oral Rehabil. 2025 Oct;52(10):1629-1640. doi: 10.1111/joor.14027. Epub 2025 May 14.
Despite various treatment approaches for bruxism, there is limited evidence comparing exercise therapy and occlusal splints, highlighting the importance of this study.
To compare the effects of a 6-week jaw exercise (JE) program with combined jaw and posture exercises (JP) on pain and mandibular motion in patients with probable sleep bruxism. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the effects of the interventions on oral parafunctions, posture, and sleep quality.
Sixty-three patients with probable sleep bruxism were randomly assigned to JE, JP, or Occlusal Splints (OS) groups at the University Hospital. Pain levels were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the maximum oral opening was measured using a calliper. Secondary outcomes included oral parafunctions, evaluated via the Oral Behaviours Checklist, and posture, assessed using craniovertebral and craniohorizontal angles. Assessments were performed at baseline, post-treatment (6th week), and 12th week follow-up. Data were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA (Group × Time).
All groups demonstrated significant pain reductions (p < 0.05), but none of the groups showed superiority (p > 0.05). Mouth opening improved significantly only in the JE group (p < 0.05), with no intergroup differences (p > 0.05). Improvements in oral parafunctions occurred in the JE and JP groups (p < 0.05), but the differences between the groups were not significant (p > 0.05). No significant changes were observed in the craniovertebral or craniohorizontal angles (p > 0.05). No adverse events were observed in any intervention group.
This trial found no substantial superiority between interventions. Exercise-based therapies (JE and JP) and OS similarly improved pain, mouth opening, and oral parafunctions in bruxism patients, with no postural changes. Further studies should explore long-term effects in diverse populations.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05555628.
尽管针对磨牙症有多种治疗方法,但比较运动疗法和咬合板的证据有限,凸显了本研究的重要性。
比较为期6周的下颌运动(JE)计划与下颌和姿势联合运动(JP)对可能患有睡眠磨牙症患者的疼痛和下颌运动的影响。次要目标是评估干预措施对口腔副功能、姿势和睡眠质量的影响。
63名可能患有睡眠磨牙症的患者在大学医院被随机分配到JE、JP或咬合板(OS)组。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛程度,使用卡尺测量最大张口度。次要结果包括通过口腔行为检查表评估的口腔副功能,以及使用颅椎角和颅水平角评估的姿势。在基线、治疗后(第6周)和第12周随访时进行评估。使用重复测量方差分析(组×时间)分析数据。
所有组的疼痛均显著减轻(p<0.05),但没有一组显示出优越性(p>0.05)。仅JE组的张口度有显著改善(p<0.05),组间无差异(p>0.05)。JE组和JP组的口腔副功能有所改善(p<0.05),但组间差异不显著(p>0.05)。颅椎角或颅水平角未观察到显著变化(p>0.05)。任何干预组均未观察到不良事件。
本试验发现干预措施之间没有实质性的优越性。基于运动的疗法(JE和JP)和OS同样改善了磨牙症患者的疼痛、张口度和口腔副功能,且姿势无变化。进一步的研究应探索对不同人群的长期影响。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05555628。