• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新评估顺铂在尿路上皮癌中的适用性:一项关于剂量降低策略的回顾性研究

Reassessing Cisplatin Eligibility in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study on Dose Reduction Strategies.

作者信息

Yamamoto Satoshi, Kurokawa Koichiro, Watanabe Koki, Kanaoka Sanji, Nakamura Kazuyoshi

机构信息

Urology, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Kisarazu, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Apr 14;17(4):e82261. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82261. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.82261
PMID:40370874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12077924/
Abstract

Background This study aims to assess the impact of reduced cisplatin doses on treatment efficacy and toxicity in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) and renal impairment. Current guidelines suggest excluding patients with renal impairment from cisplatin treatment. However, reevaluating the efficacy of dose-adjusted cisplatin based on renal function is crucial. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 68 patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic UC (T2-4N0M0, TanyN1-3M0 or TanyNanyM1) between 2017 and 2024. These patients were divided into two groups: 40 received a full dose (100%) of cisplatin (CDDP:70-135mg) and 28 received a 75% dose (CDDP:60-120mg). Clinical outcomes and adverse effects were analyzed and compared between these two groups, with a particular focus on patients with renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 50-60). Results Complete response (CR) rates were 15.0% for the full-dose group and 14.3% for the 75% dose group, while partial response (PR) rates were 35.0% and 42.9%, respectively. The overall response rates (CR + PR) were 50.0% for the full dose and 57.2% for the 75% dose. For patients with renal impairment, the 75% dose group demonstrated similar efficacy and adverse effect profiles compared to the full-dose group. Conclusions The findings suggest that reduced doses of cisplatin, based on renal function, do not compromise treatment efficacy in UC patients. Thus, expanding cisplatin eligibility to include UC patients with renal impairment (eGFR 30-60 mL/min) is warranted, indicating that dose-adjusted cisplatin treatment is a viable option.

摘要

背景 本研究旨在评估顺铂剂量减少对尿路上皮癌(UC)合并肾功能损害患者治疗疗效和毒性的影响。当前指南建议将肾功能损害患者排除在顺铂治疗之外。然而,基于肾功能重新评估剂量调整后的顺铂疗效至关重要。方法 对2017年至2024年间诊断为局部晚期或转移性UC(T2 - 4N0M0、TanyN1 - 3M0或TanyNanyM1)的68例患者进行了一项回顾性研究。这些患者被分为两组:40例接受全剂量(100%)顺铂(CDDP:70 - 135mg),28例接受75%剂量(CDDP:60 - 120mg)。分析并比较了两组的临床结局和不良反应,特别关注肾功能损害患者(估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)50 - 60)。结果 全剂量组的完全缓解(CR)率为15.0%,75%剂量组为14.3%,而部分缓解(PR)率分别为35.0%和42.9%。总体缓解率(CR + PR)全剂量组为50.0%,75%剂量组为57.2%。对于肾功能损害患者,75%剂量组与全剂量组相比显示出相似的疗效和不良反应特征。结论 研究结果表明,根据肾功能减少顺铂剂量不会损害UC患者的治疗疗效。因此,有必要扩大顺铂适用范围,将肾功能损害(eGFR 30 - 60 mL/min)的UC患者纳入其中,这表明剂量调整后的顺铂治疗是一种可行的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05d5/12077924/d85a9f053234/cureus-0017-00000082261-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05d5/12077924/e65ad7538506/cureus-0017-00000082261-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05d5/12077924/d85a9f053234/cureus-0017-00000082261-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05d5/12077924/e65ad7538506/cureus-0017-00000082261-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05d5/12077924/d85a9f053234/cureus-0017-00000082261-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Reassessing Cisplatin Eligibility in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study on Dose Reduction Strategies.重新评估顺铂在尿路上皮癌中的适用性:一项关于剂量降低策略的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 Apr 14;17(4):e82261. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82261. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
[Impact of different methods of estimating renal function on determining eligibility for cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapy in patients with invasive urothelial carcinoma].[不同肾功能评估方法对确定浸润性尿路上皮癌患者顺铂(CDDP)化疗 eligibility 的影响] (注:这里“eligibility”直接保留英文,因为在医学语境中可能有特定含义,暂无法准确翻译为合适中文词汇,可根据实际情况进一步完善)
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2011 Dec;57(12):671-6.
3
Impact of renal function of patients with advanced urothelial cancer on eligibility for first-line chemotherapy and treatment outcomes.晚期尿路上皮癌患者肾功能对一线化疗资格及治疗结果的影响。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep;45(9):867-73. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv082. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
4
Oncological outcomes of dose reductions in cisplatin due to renal dysfunction for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.转移性尿路上皮癌患者因肾功能不全而减少顺铂剂量后的肿瘤学结局。
BJUI Compass. 2021 Mar 9;2(5):322-330. doi: 10.1002/bco2.81. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Evaluation of renal function using cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy.采用基于胱抑素 C 的估算肾小球滤过率评价接受吉西他滨和顺铂化疗的尿路上皮癌患者的肾功能。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Dec;46(6):1622-1628. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13501. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
6
Eligibility Criteria for Different Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Regimens in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.转移性尿路上皮癌不同铂类化疗方案的 eligibility 标准。(注:这里“eligibility”常见释义为“资格;合格”等,根据语境可能需要进一步调整表述使其更通顺自然)
Cureus. 2024 Aug 9;16(8):e66520. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66520. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Impact of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in cisplatin-fit and -unfit patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma.紫杉醇、顺铂和吉西他滨作为一线化疗药物在适合和不适合顺铂的晚期/转移性尿路上皮癌患者中的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;39(10):731.e25-731.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
8
Moderate renal dysfunction may not require a cisplatin dose reduction: a retrospective study of cancer patients with renal impairment.中度肾功能不全可能不需要降低顺铂剂量:肾功能损害癌症患者的回顾性研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec;18(6):977-82. doi: 10.1007/s10147-012-0481-x. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
9
Chemotherapy with cisplatin, epirubicin and docetaxel in transitional cell urothelial cancer. Phase II trial.顺铂、表柔比星和多西他赛用于移行细胞尿路上皮癌的化疗。II期试验。
Eur J Cancer. 2000 Jan;36(1):74-9. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00187-2.
10
Comparison of full-dose gemcitabine/cisplatin, dose-reduced gemcitabine/cisplatin, and gemcitabine/carboplatin in real-world patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.真实世界中晚期尿路上皮癌患者中吉西他滨/顺铂全剂量、低剂量与吉西他滨/卡铂的比较。
BMC Urol. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01139-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Real-world Study of Avelumab First-line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in France: Overall Results from the Noninterventional AVENANCE Study and Analysis of Outcomes by Second-line Treatment.阿维鲁单抗一线维持治疗法国晚期尿路上皮癌患者的真实世界研究:非干预性AVENANCE研究的总体结果及二线治疗结局分析
Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Apr;8(2):407-416. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.014. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
Split-Dose Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis.局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者的分剂量顺铂:系统文献综述和网状Meta分析
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Dec;22(6):102176. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102176. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
Derivation and external validation of a simple risk score for predicting severe acute kidney injury after intravenous cisplatin: cohort study.基于静脉注射顺铂后发生严重急性肾损伤的预测,建立并外部验证一种简单风险评分的推导:队列研究。
BMJ. 2024 Mar 27;384:e077169. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077169.
4
Immunomodulatory effects and improved outcomes with cisplatin- versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy plus atezolizumab in urothelial cancer.顺铂与卡铂为基础的化疗联合阿替利珠单抗在膀胱癌中的免疫调节作用及改善结局。
Cell Rep Med. 2024 Feb 20;5(2):101393. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101393. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
5
Clinical questions and good practice statements of clinical practice guidelines for management of kidney injury during anticancer drug therapy 2022.《2022年抗癌药物治疗期间肾损伤管理临床实践指南的临床问题与良好实践声明》
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2024 Feb;28(2):85-122. doi: 10.1007/s10157-023-02415-0. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
Nivolumab plus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.纳武利尤单抗联合吉西他滨-顺铂治疗晚期尿路上皮癌。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 9;389(19):1778-1789. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2309863. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
7
Avelumab First-Line Maintenance for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Results From the JAVELIN Bladder 100 Trial After ≥2 Years of Follow-Up.avelumab 一线维持治疗晚期尿路上皮癌:≥2 年随访的 JAVELIN Bladder 100 试验结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul 1;41(19):3486-3492. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01792. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
8
Refining the Characterization and Outcome of Pathological Complete Responders after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Lessons from the Randomized Phase III VESPER (GETUG-AFU V05) Trial.优化肌层浸润性膀胱癌新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解者的特征及预后:来自随机III期VESPER(GETUG-AFU V05)试验的经验教训。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;15(6):1742. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061742.
9
Comparison of full-dose gemcitabine/cisplatin, dose-reduced gemcitabine/cisplatin, and gemcitabine/carboplatin in real-world patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.真实世界中晚期尿路上皮癌患者中吉西他滨/顺铂全剂量、低剂量与吉西他滨/卡铂的比较。
BMC Urol. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01139-9.
10
Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.阿维鲁单抗维持治疗晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 24;383(13):1218-1230. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002788. Epub 2020 Sep 18.