• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退伍军人感染新冠病毒的经历以及医疗服务提供者如何以同理心塑造护理和认知。

Veterans' Experiences with COVID-19 and How Providers Can Shape Care and Perception with Empathy.

作者信息

Petrova Valentina V, Turner Aaron P, Simons Carol, Kamiab Neelab A, Crothers Kristina, Sayre George G

机构信息

VA HSR Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.

VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09557-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09557-9
PMID:40375042
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic challenged healthcare systems like the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to pivot to new models of care and keep up with rapidly evolving practice and treatment guidelines. These challenges were amplified by the context of a polarized society and widespread mistrust of government and traditional media communication.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to better understand experiences with COVID-specific care and the role of patient-provider interactions.

DESIGN

Using semi-structured qualitative phone interviews, we collected Veterans' accounts of their treatment, recovery, and any follow-up care for COVID-19.

PARTICIPANTS

We used VA electronic health records data to recruit a nationally representative sample of participants across three disease severity categories (ICU, acute care hospitalization, and outpatient) and across three timepoints (2-8 weeks, 8 weeks to 6 months, and 12 months) after having COVID-19. A total of 94 Veterans were interviewed by phone once between June 2021 and June 2022.

APPROACH

Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using deductive-inductive content analysis.

KEY RESULTS

Three main themes emerged: (1) Veterans made sense of their COVID-19 experiences by comparing themselves to others and doing their own research, often feeling they had to defend their beliefs to others and in the face of critical media coverage; (2) perceptions of care sometimes aligned with distrust in institutions but positive communication with healthcare providers substantially impacted Veterans' trust in their VA care; and (3) the most effective healthcare interactions resulted from clear and empathetic answers from trusted providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Clear, consistent messages delivered with respect and empathy had the potential to overcome patients' hesitancy and mistrust of government and media information sources.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chronic Lung Disease and COVID-19: Understanding Severity, Recovery and Rehabilitation Needs (LAUREL), ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04628039.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情给退伍军人事务部(VA)等医疗系统带来挑战,促使其转向新的护理模式,并跟上迅速演变的实践和治疗指南。两极分化的社会背景以及对政府和传统媒体传播的普遍不信任加剧了这些挑战。

目的

我们试图更好地了解新冠特定护理的经历以及患者与提供者互动的作用。

设计

通过半结构化定性电话访谈,我们收集了退伍军人关于其新冠治疗、康复及任何后续护理的描述。

参与者

我们利用退伍军人事务部电子健康记录数据,招募了一个具有全国代表性的样本,涵盖三个疾病严重程度类别(重症监护病房、急性护理住院和门诊)以及感染新冠后三个时间点(2至8周、8周至6个月、12个月)的参与者。2021年6月至2022年6月期间,共对94名退伍军人进行了一次电话访谈。

方法

访谈进行转录,并采用演绎-归纳内容分析法进行分析。

主要结果

出现了三个主要主题:(1)退伍军人通过将自己与他人比较并自行研究来理解他们的新冠经历,常常觉得他们必须在他人面前以及面对批判性媒体报道时捍卫自己的信念;(2)对护理的看法有时与对机构的不信任一致,但与医疗保健提供者的积极沟通极大地影响了退伍军人对其退伍军人事务部护理的信任;(3)最有效的医疗互动源于值得信赖的提供者给出的清晰且有同理心的回答。

结论

以尊重和同理心传递的清晰、一致的信息有可能克服患者对政府和媒体信息来源的犹豫和不信任。

试验注册

慢性肺病与新冠:了解严重程度、康复及康复需求(LAUREL),ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT04628039。

相似文献

1
Veterans' Experiences with COVID-19 and How Providers Can Shape Care and Perception with Empathy.退伍军人感染新冠病毒的经历以及医疗服务提供者如何以同理心塑造护理和认知。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09557-9.
2
Vaccine hesitancy as an opportunity for engagement: A rapid qualitative study of patients and employees in the U.S. Veterans Affairs healthcare system.将疫苗犹豫视为参与的契机:对美国退伍军人事务医疗系统中患者和员工的快速定性研究
Vaccine X. 2021 Dec;9:100116. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100116. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
3
Antecedents to COVID-19 vaccine uptake among patients and employees in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局患者和员工接种新冠病毒疫苗的先前情况。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Feb 28;13(2):73-84. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac085.
4
COVID-19 vaccination uptake and receptivity among veterans enrolled in homelessness-tailored primary health care clinics: provider trust vs. misinformation.COVID-19 疫苗接种率和接受度在接受以无家可归为特色的初级保健诊所服务的退伍军人中:提供者信任与错误信息。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 12;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02251-x.
5
"You want people to listen to you": Patient experiences of women's healthcare within the Veterans Health Administration.“你希望人们倾听你”:退伍军人健康管理局内女性医疗保健的患者体验
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59(6):e14324. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14324. Epub 2024 May 28.
6
VA-Delivered or VA-Purchased Care: Important Factors for Veterans Navigating Care Decisions.VA 提供或 VA 购买的护理:退伍军人在做出护理决策时需要考虑的重要因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(7):1647-1654. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08128-0. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
7
VA Provider Perspectives on Coordinating COPD Care Across Health Systems.VA 医疗服务提供者对在整个医疗体系中协调 COPD 护理的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(Suppl 1):37-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04971-2.
8
A Mixed-Methods Study of Veterans Affairs Providers' Experiences Communicating With Patients About the Affordable Care Act.一项关于退伍军人事务部提供者与患者就《平价医疗法案》进行沟通的经验的混合方法研究。
Mil Med. 2017 May;182(5):e1715-e1723. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00354.
9
Courage, camaraderie and compassion: a qualitative exploration into UK military veterans' experiences of self-compassion within the context of alcohol use disorders and recovery.勇气、情谊与同情:对英国退伍军人在酒精使用障碍及康复背景下自我同情体验的质性探索。
BMJ Mil Health. 2025 Jan 28;171(1):45-50. doi: 10.1136/military-2023-002383.
10
Understanding Women Veterans' Family Planning Counseling Experiences and Preferences to Inform Patient-Centered Care.了解女性退伍军人的计划生育咨询体验和偏好,以提供以患者为中心的护理。
Womens Health Issues. 2019 May-Jun;29(3):283-289. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Building Authentic Connection in the Patient-Physician Relationship.在医患关系中建立真实的联系。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319231225996. doi: 10.1177/21501319231225996.
2
The Impacts of Politicization on Public Health Workers: The COVID-19 Pandemic in Oregon and Montana.政治化对公共卫生工作者的影响:俄勒冈州和蒙大拿州的 COVID-19 大流行。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2023 Dec 1;48(6):859-888. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10852601.
3
Is COVID-19 Care Better in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals, Ceteris Paribus?
在其他条件相同的情况下,退伍军人健康管理局医院对新冠肺炎的治疗效果更好吗?
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315829. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15829.
4
Barriers and Gaps in Effective Health Communication at Both Public Health and Healthcare Delivery Levels During Epidemics and Pandemics; Systematic Review.传染病和大流行期间公共卫生和医疗保健提供层面有效健康沟通的障碍和差距;系统评价。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2023 May 19;17:e395. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2023.61.
5
A mixed methods study exploring requests for unproven COVID therapies such as ivermectin and healthcare distrust in the rural South.一项混合方法研究,探讨在南方农村地区对伊维菌素等未经证实的新冠治疗方法的需求以及对医疗保健的不信任。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Feb;31:102104. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102104. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
6
Health Care Providers' Trusted Sources for Information About COVID-19 Vaccines: Mixed Methods Study.医疗保健提供者获取有关新冠疫苗信息的可靠来源:混合方法研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Dec 8;1(1):e33330. doi: 10.2196/33330. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Attitudes and Intentions of US Veterans Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination.美国退伍军人对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的态度和意向。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2132548. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32548.
8
Vaccine hesitancy as an opportunity for engagement: A rapid qualitative study of patients and employees in the U.S. Veterans Affairs healthcare system.将疫苗犹豫视为参与的契机:对美国退伍军人事务医疗系统中患者和员工的快速定性研究
Vaccine X. 2021 Dec;9:100116. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100116. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
9
COVID-19 Impact on the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Patient Perspectives on Emergency Physician Empathy and Communication.新冠疫情对医患关系的影响:患者对急诊医生同理心与沟通的看法
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2021 Jul;9(3):125-132. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2021.89058.1216.
10
The belief that politics drive scientific research & its impact on COVID-19 risk assessment.认为政治驱动科学研究及其对 COVID-19 风险评估的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 21;16(4):e0249937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249937. eCollection 2021.