• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度医疗保健研究中的利益相关者参与——一项系统综述。

Stakeholder engagement in healthcare research in India - A systematic review.

作者信息

Rajendran Remya U, Nayak Baby S, Siva N, Phagdol Tenzin, Pai Mamatha Shivananda, D'Souza Preethy, Noronha Judith Angelitta

机构信息

Department of Child Health Nursing, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Department of Child Health Nursing, SUM Nursing College, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (SOA) University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 May 15;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01341-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-025-01341-9
PMID:40375276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12080155/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stakeholder engagement is increasingly crucial in healthcare research, particularly in diverse and complex settings such as India. Stakeholder engagement in health research is about collaborating with key parties such as patients, healthcare providers and policymakers to ensure the research is relevant and impactful by addressing real-world needs, thereby enhancing its quality and effect on healthcare practices.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to summarize the evidence on stakeholder engagement in healthcare research and its influence on research outcomes and healthcare policies in India.

METHODS

The evaluation was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, SCOPUS, ProQuest, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL Indian Citation Index and J-Gate, focussing on stakeholder involvement in healthcare settings in hospitals and communities in India. Various research methodologies were employed, with studies not centred on healthcare stakeholder engagement or unrelated sectors being excluded. Tools such as the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative studies and the mixed methods appraisal tool were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Data synthesis was carried out using the descriptive/narrative synthesis approach.

RESULTS

We included 25 articles on the basis of our eligibility criteria. These articles comprised reviews, theories of change, quantitative studies, reports, mapping, commentaries, conference proceedings, qualitative studies, experience papers and mixed methods research. The review examined different types and methods of engaging stakeholders in healthcare research projects, evaluated their influence on evidence-based practice, and investigated their relevance to reaching "hard-to-reach" populations. Overcoming financial, time, knowledge and logistical barriers and gaining support from international and governmental bodies can lead to more inclusive research with a significant impact.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that stakeholder engagement contributes to more contextually relevant and ethically grounded research, though challenges related to power dynamics, resource allocation and inclusivity remain prevalent. The review concludes by providing recommendations for enhancing stakeholder engagement practices in future healthcare research in India, emphasizing the need for capacity-building and inclusive frameworks that ensure diverse voices are represented.

摘要

背景

利益相关者的参与在医疗保健研究中日益重要,尤其是在印度这样多样化和复杂的环境中。利益相关者参与健康研究是指与患者、医疗保健提供者和政策制定者等关键方合作,通过满足现实世界的需求来确保研究具有相关性和影响力,从而提高其质量以及对医疗实践的影响。

目的

本研究的目的是总结印度医疗保健研究中利益相关者参与的证据及其对研究结果和医疗政策的影响。

方法

评估遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行。在PubMed、SCOPUS、ProQuest、EMBASE、科学网、CINAHL印度引文索引和J-Gate中进行了系统检索,重点关注印度医院和社区医疗环境中利益相关者的参与情况。采用了各种研究方法,未以医疗保健利益相关者参与为中心或与不相关部门的研究被排除。使用定性研究的批判性评估技能计划清单和混合方法评估工具等工具来评估研究质量。使用描述性/叙述性综合方法进行数据综合。

结果

根据纳入标准,我们纳入了25篇文章。这些文章包括综述、变革理论、定量研究、报告、映射、评论、会议记录、定性研究、经验论文和混合方法研究。该综述研究了在医疗保健研究项目中让利益相关者参与的不同类型和方法,评估了它们对循证实践的影响,并调查了它们与接触“难以接触到的”人群的相关性。克服财务、时间、知识和后勤障碍,并获得国际和政府机构的支持,可以带来更具包容性且具有重大影响的研究。

结论

研究结果表明,利益相关者的参与有助于开展更符合实际情况且基于伦理的研究,尽管与权力动态、资源分配和包容性相关的挑战仍然普遍存在。综述最后为加强印度未来医疗保健研究中的利益相关者参与实践提供了建议,强调了能力建设和包容性框架的必要性,以确保不同声音得到体现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b26a/12080155/9f8e0ce31cef/12961_2025_1341_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b26a/12080155/4771a48765e7/12961_2025_1341_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b26a/12080155/e3f0ea4cab16/12961_2025_1341_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b26a/12080155/ea0fb4c18425/12961_2025_1341_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b26a/12080155/9f8e0ce31cef/12961_2025_1341_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b26a/12080155/4771a48765e7/12961_2025_1341_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b26a/12080155/e3f0ea4cab16/12961_2025_1341_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b26a/12080155/ea0fb4c18425/12961_2025_1341_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b26a/12080155/9f8e0ce31cef/12961_2025_1341_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stakeholder engagement in healthcare research in India - A systematic review.印度医疗保健研究中的利益相关者参与——一项系统综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 May 15;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01341-9.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
6
PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis.方案:利益相关者参与健康指南制定的障碍与促进因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 25;18(2):e1237. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1237. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.
9
Engaging Diverse Stakeholders to Improve Therapy Access for Hispanic and Latino Autistic Individuals and Families.吸引不同利益相关者,改善西班牙裔和拉丁裔自闭症患者及其家庭获得治疗的机会。
Am J Occup Ther. 2025 Mar 1;79(2). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2025.050942.
10
Service user and stakeholder engagement in maternal and newborn health research in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review protocol.服务使用者和利益相关者参与中低收入国家母婴健康研究:系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 23;18(5):e0286145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286145. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Glutamate delta-1 receptor regulates oligodendrocyte progenitor cell differentiation and myelination in normal and demyelinating conditions.谷氨酸 delta-1 受体调节正常和脱髓鞘条件下少突胶质前体细胞的分化和髓鞘形成。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 20;18(11):e0294583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294583. eCollection 2023.
2
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.迈向实施利益相关者参与模型(I-STEM),以改善医疗保健服务。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1997-2012. doi: 10.1111/hex.13808. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
3
Feasibility of tobacco cessation intervention at non-communicable diseases clinics: A qualitative study from a North Indian State.
在非传染性疾病诊所进行戒烟干预的可行性:来自印度北部一个邦的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0284920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284920. eCollection 2023.
4
Intersectoral Collaboration to Promote Child Development: The Contributions of the Actor-Network Theory.跨部门合作促进儿童发展:行动者网络理论的贡献。
Qual Health Res. 2023 Apr;33(5):451-467. doi: 10.1177/10497323231153534. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
5
Stakeholder engagement as a strategy to enhance palliative care involvement in intensive care units: A theory of change approach.将利益相关者参与作为一种增强姑息治疗在重症监护病房中参与度的策略:一种变革理论方法。
J Crit Care. 2023 Jun;75:154244. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154244. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
6
Dual effects of NV-CoV-2 biomimetic polymer: An antiviral regimen against COVID-19.NV-CoV-2 仿生聚合物的双重作用:COVID-19 的抗病毒方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0278963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278963. eCollection 2022.
7
Community engagement and involvement in managing the COVID-19 pandemic among urban poor in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review and stakeholders mapping.社区参与和投入在管理城市贫困人群中的 COVID-19 大流行:系统的范围界定综述和利益相关者图谱。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2133723. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2133723.
8
A theory of change roadmap for universal health coverage in India.印度全民健康覆盖变革理论路线图。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;10:1040913. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1040913. eCollection 2022.
9
Development of a multi-component tobacco cessation training package utilizing multiple approaches of intervention development for health care providers and patients attending non-communicable disease clinics of Punjab, India.利用多种干预措施开发方法,为印度旁遮普邦非传染性疾病诊所的医疗保健提供者和患者开发多组分戒烟培训包。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;10:1053428. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1053428. eCollection 2022.
10
Engaging Stakeholders in Social Determinants of Health Quality Improvement Efforts.参与社会决定因素健康质量改进工作的利益相关者。
Perm J. 2022 Dec 19;26(4):28-38. doi: 10.7812/TPP/22.035. Epub 2022 Sep 26.