• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Service user and stakeholder engagement in maternal and newborn health research in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review protocol.服务使用者和利益相关者参与中低收入国家母婴健康研究:系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 23;18(5):e0286145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286145. eCollection 2023.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Private sector delivery of quality care for maternal, newborn and child health in low-income and middle-income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol.私营部门在中低收入国家提供优质孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康护理服务:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):e033141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033141.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Private sector delivery of maternal and newborn health care in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.私营部门在中低收入国家提供孕产妇和新生儿保健服务:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 8;11(12):e055600. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055600.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Effectiveness of interventions for improving timely diagnosis of breast and cervical cancers in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.干预措施在提高中低收入国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌及时诊断率方面的效果:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):e042788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042788.
8
Effect of adverse perinatal outcomes on postpartum maternal mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: a protocol for systematic review.不良围产期结局对中低收入国家产后产妇心理健康的影响:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 14;13(12):e074447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074447.
9
Service coverage and health workforce allocation strategies for geriatric and palliative care in low- and middle-income countries: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.中低收入国家老年和姑息治疗的服务覆盖范围和卫生人力配置策略:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 11;101(10):e29030. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029030.
10
Cost of maternal health services in low and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇保健服务的成本:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e027822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027822.

引用本文的文献

1
Using an experience-based co-design approach to develop strategies for implementing an intravenous iron intervention to treat moderate and severe anemia in pregnancy in Malawi.采用基于经验的协同设计方法,制定在马拉维实施静脉注射铁剂干预措施以治疗妊娠期中度和重度贫血的策略。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Nov 15;5(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00661-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Potentials and challenges of using co-design in health services research in low- and middle-income countries.在中低收入国家的卫生服务研究中使用共同设计的潜力和挑战。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2023 Mar 13;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41256-023-00290-6.
2
Involving and engaging pregnant women in maternity-related research: reflections on an innovative approach.让孕妇参与与孕产相关的研究:对一种创新方法的思考。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Dec 16;7(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00332-8.
3
Stakeholder engagement in the health policy process in a low income country: a qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions of the challenges to effective inclusion in Malawi.利益相关者参与低收入国家卫生政策制定过程:对马拉维有效纳入利益相关者所面临挑战的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 18;21(1):984. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07016-9.
4
Intersectional (in) equities in contact coverage of maternal and newborn health services in Nepal: insights from a nationwide cross-sectional household survey.尼泊尔孕产妇和新生儿保健服务接触覆盖方面的交叉(不)平等:来自全国横断面家庭调查的见解
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 9;21(1):1098. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11142-8.
5
Delivery channels and socioeconomic inequalities in coverage of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: analysis of 36 cross-sectional surveys in low-income and middle-income countries.生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施的提供渠道和社会经济不平等:对低收入和中等收入国家的 36 项横断面调查的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Aug;9(8):e1101-e1109. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00204-7. Epub 2021 May 26.
6
A mapping and synthesis of tools for stakeholder and community engagement in quality improvement initiatives for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health.为生殖、母婴、新生儿、儿童和青少年健康质量改进举措进行利益攸关者和社区参与的工具的映射和综合。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):744-756. doi: 10.1111/hex.13237. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Impact of COVID-19 on health services utilization in Province-2 of Nepal: a qualitative study among community members and stakeholders.尼泊尔第二省 COVID-19 对卫生服务利用的影响:社区成员和利益相关者的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 24;21(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06176-y.
9
Health system redesign for maternal and newborn survival: rethinking care models to close the global equity gap.为母婴生存而重新设计卫生系统:重新思考护理模式以弥合全球公平差距。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002539.
10
Stakeholders' experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system?利益相关者对公共卫生研究过程的体验:是时候改变系统了?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jul 18;18(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00599-5.

服务使用者和利益相关者参与中低收入国家母婴健康研究:系统评价方案。

Service user and stakeholder engagement in maternal and newborn health research in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Central Institute of Science and Technology (CIST) College, Pokhara University, Kathmandu, Nepal.

School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 May 23;18(5):e0286145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286145. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0286145
PMID:37220102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10204967/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Service user and stakeholder engagement have been widely considered as key aspects in translating knowledge into realistic policies and practices. However, there is a paucity of accumulative evidence about service user and stakeholder engagements in maternal and newborn health (MNH) research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Therefore, we aim to systematically review the existing literature that includes service user and stakeholder engagement in maternal and newborn health research in low- and middle-income countries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The design of this protocol is guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-P) checklist. We will systematically run the search in PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Science Direct, and CINAHL to obtain relevant peer-reviewed literature published between January 1990 and March 2023. The list of extracted references will be screened by applying the study inclusion criteria, and eligible studies will be processed for further evaluation before being included in the review. The quality of the selected study will be assessed using the critical appraisal skills program (CASP) checklists and the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) checklist. A narrative synthesis will be used to synthesised results from all the included studies.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this systematic review will be the first synthesised evidence on service user and stakeholder engagement in maternal and newborn health research in low- and middle-income countries. The study highlights the importance of service user and stakeholder roles in designing, implementing, and evaluating maternal and newborn health interventions in resource-poor settings. The evidence from this review is expected to be useful for national and international researchers/stakeholders for practising meaningful and effective ways of engaging users and stakeholders in maternal and newborn health research and related activities. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022314613.

摘要

背景

服务用户和利益相关者的参与已被广泛认为是将知识转化为现实政策和实践的关键方面。然而,在中低收入国家(LMICs)的母婴健康研究中,关于服务用户和利益相关者参与的累积证据很少。因此,我们旨在系统地回顾现有的文献,其中包括中低收入国家母婴健康研究中的服务用户和利益相关者的参与。

材料和方法

本方案的设计遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)检查表。我们将在 PubMed/MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Scopus、Science Direct 和 CINAHL 中系统地进行搜索,以获取 1990 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月期间发表的相关同行评议文献。提取的参考文献列表将根据研究纳入标准进行筛选,合格的研究将在纳入综述之前进行进一步评估。将使用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)检查表和混合方法评估工具(MMAT)检查表评估选定研究的质量。将使用叙述性综合方法综合所有纳入研究的结果。

讨论与结论

据我们所知,这是系统评价中首次综合关于中低收入国家母婴健康研究中服务用户和利益相关者参与的证据。该研究强调了服务用户和利益相关者在设计、实施和评估资源匮乏环境中的母婴健康干预措施中的作用。预计从这项研究中获得的证据对国家和国际研究人员/利益相关者来说是有用的,他们可以采用有意义和有效的方式让用户和利益相关者参与母婴健康研究和相关活动。PROSPERO 注册号为 CRD42022314613。