Professor, Department of Dentistry, Nova Esperança Faculty (FACENE), João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Doctoral student, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Paraiba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Mar;131(3):392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
To simplify dental procedures, multicomponent products such as universal adhesives and self-etch ceramic primers have been recommended for glass-ceramic bonding; however, studies have shown a wide range of results.
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the in vitro bond strength promoted by hydrofluoric acid+silane-containing universal adhesives and a self-etch ceramic primer to glass-ceramics and compare it with that of conventional treatments.
A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, LILACS, and ISI Web of Science databases up to April 2021. In vitro studies assessing the resin-mediated bond to glass-ceramics by using a self-etch ceramic primer and hydrofluoric acid+silane-containing universal adhesives and/or compared with traditional hydrofluoric acid+glass-ceramic primers were included. Selection of studies, data extraction, and risk-of-bias analysis were performed. Statistical analysis was performed by using a review management software program using a random effects model (α=.05).
A total of 33 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 26 studies in the quantitative analysis. Bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic was higher when a hydrofluoric acid+glass-ceramic primer was used than when using a hydrofluoric acid+silane-containing universal adhesive (P<.05), except when 9% to 10% acid concentration was used in combination with static aging (P=.100). A self-etch ceramic primer promoted bond strength values to lithium disilicate that were similar to those of the hydrofluoric acid+glass-ceramic primer (P>.100).
Hydrofluoric acid+silane-containing universal adhesive was not as effective as the hydrofluoric acid+glass-ceramic primer in promoting bond strength to glass-ceramic. Bond strength values generated by a self-etch ceramic primer to glass-ceramic were similar to those generated by the conventional treatment.
为简化牙科操作,已推荐使用多组分产品(如通用粘结剂和自酸蚀陶瓷底涂剂)来粘结玻璃陶瓷;然而,研究结果差异较大。
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是分析含氢氟酸+硅烷的通用粘结剂和自酸蚀陶瓷底涂剂对玻璃陶瓷的体外粘结强度,并与传统处理方法进行比较。
对 PubMed/Medline、Scopus、LILACS 和 ISI Web of Science 数据库进行了系统检索,检索时间截至 2021 年 4 月。纳入使用自酸蚀陶瓷底涂剂和含氢氟酸+硅烷的通用粘结剂评估对玻璃陶瓷的树脂粘结的体外研究,或与传统氢氟酸+玻璃陶瓷底涂剂比较的研究。进行研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险分析。使用综述管理软件程序,采用随机效应模型(α=.05)进行统计分析。
定性分析纳入 33 项研究,定量分析纳入 26 项研究。与使用含氢氟酸+硅烷的通用粘结剂相比,使用氢氟酸+玻璃陶瓷底涂剂时,锂硅玻璃陶瓷的粘结强度更高(P<.05),但在酸浓度为 9%~10%并结合静态老化时除外(P=.100)。自酸蚀陶瓷底涂剂的粘结强度值与氢氟酸+玻璃陶瓷底涂剂相似(P>.100)。
含氢氟酸+硅烷的通用粘结剂在促进玻璃陶瓷粘结强度方面不如氢氟酸+玻璃陶瓷底涂剂有效。自酸蚀陶瓷底涂剂对玻璃陶瓷的粘结强度与传统处理方法相似。