• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体植入术并联合小切口玻璃体切除术治疗黄斑皱襞和白内障:飞秒激光辅助与非飞秒激光辅助的疗效比较

Macular pucker and cataract treated with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation combined with small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: a comparison of outcomes with and without femtosecond laser assistance.

作者信息

Chao Howard Wen-Haur, Cheng Cheng-Kuo, Liou Shiow-Wen, Chao Hsiao-Ming

机构信息

Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Department of Medical Education, Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 1;12:1497776. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1497776. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1497776
PMID:40375927
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12078321/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Age-related cataracts and macular pucker are increasingly common. Standard treatment combines phacoemulsification, IOL implantation and small gauge vitrectomy. Recent advancements and acceptance of femtosecond laser (FSL) assistance in cataract surgery have improved precision and outcomes. However, evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of FSL-assisted phacovitrectomy, particularly in Oriental patient populations with distinct anatomical and genetic characteristics, remain limited. This study aims to address this critical gap by comparing the safety and post-operative outcomes of 23- or 25-gauge phacovitrectomy for stage 3 macular pucker and medium density cataract with versus without FSL-assistance (FSLA), in an Oriental patient cohort.

METHODS

Patients with stage 3 macular pucker and medium-density cataract were recruited and divided into two age-matched groups: group 1 ( = 13) underwent conventional phacovitrectomy without FSLA, and Group 2 ( = 13) underwent phacovitrectomy with FSLA. Evaluations included pre- and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; Snellen E and LogMAR), cataract surgical time, phacoemulsification energy cost, corneal wavefront data, endothelial cell density (ECD), and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in postoperative visual acuity were observed in both groups ( < 0.05), with Group 2 (FSLA) demonstrating superior outcomes (0.48 ± 0.05/-0.45 ± 0.06; Snellen E/logMAR) compared to Group 1 (0.26 ± 0.07/-0.66 ± 0.15; Snellen E/logMAR). FSLA significantly reduced surgical duration (429.46 s vs. 740.00 s) and cumulative dissipated energy (CDE; 18.90 ± 1.59 vs. 25.24 ± 1.42) without significantly altering higher-order aberrations (0.24 to 0.22 μm). Although ECD decreased postoperatively in both groups, FSLA phacovitrectomy resulted in significantly less endothelial cell loss (227.77 ± 46.85 cells/mm) compared to conventional phacovitrectomy (389.15 ± 47.87 cells/mm). No serious complications were reported in either group.

CONCLUSION

FSLA phacovitrectomy presents a safe and more efficient alternative over traditional procedures for Oriental patients with medium density nuclear cataract patients with stage 3 macular pucker. Through enhanced IOL centration, shortened surgical times and decreased ECD loss, FSLA led to superior postoperative visual outcomes compared to traditional phacovitrectomy. This study addresses a critical gap in the literature by providing evidence for the benefits of FSLA in Oriental populations, offering valuable insights into its applicability in patients with distinct anatomical variations.

摘要

目的

年龄相关性白内障和黄斑皱襞越来越常见。标准治疗方法是将超声乳化、人工晶状体植入和小切口玻璃体切除术相结合。飞秒激光(FSL)辅助白内障手术的最新进展和应用提高了手术的精准度和效果。然而,关于FSL辅助的晶状体玻璃体切除术的有效性和安全性的证据仍然有限,特别是在具有独特解剖和遗传特征的东方患者群体中。本研究旨在通过比较23G或25G晶状体玻璃体切除术治疗3期黄斑皱襞和中度密度白内障在有和没有FSL辅助(FSLA)情况下的安全性和术后结果,填补这一关键空白。

方法

招募3期黄斑皱襞和中度密度白内障患者,并将其分为两个年龄匹配的组:第1组(n = 13)接受无FSLA的传统晶状体玻璃体切除术,第2组(n = 13)接受有FSLA的晶状体玻璃体切除术。评估指标包括术前和术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA;Snellen E和LogMAR)、白内障手术时间、超声乳化能量消耗、角膜波前数据、内皮细胞密度(ECD)和手术并发症。

结果

两组术后视力均有显著改善(P < 0.05),与第1组(0.26±0.07/-0.66±0.15;Snellen E/logMAR)相比,第2组(FSLA)的结果更优(0.48±0.05/-0.45±0.06;Snellen E/logMAR)。FSLA显著缩短了手术时间(429.46秒对740.00秒)和累积耗散能量(CDE;18.90±1.59对25.24±1.42),且未显著改变高阶像差(0.24至0.22μm)。虽然两组术后ECD均下降,但FSLA晶状体玻璃体切除术导致的内皮细胞损失明显少于传统晶状体玻璃体切除术(227.77±46.85个细胞/mm²)(389.15±47.87个细胞/mm²)。两组均未报告严重并发症。

结论

对于患有3期黄斑皱襞的中度密度核性白内障的东方患者,FSLA晶状体玻璃体切除术是一种比传统手术更安全、更有效的替代方法。通过提高人工晶状体的中心定位、缩短手术时间和减少ECD损失,FSLA与传统晶状体玻璃体切除术相比,术后视力结果更优。本研究通过提供FSLA在东方人群中的益处的证据,填补了文献中的关键空白,为其在具有独特解剖变异的患者中的适用性提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/86448c8fe423/fmed-12-1497776-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/309697a42c68/fmed-12-1497776-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/ffc23aa21cf1/fmed-12-1497776-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/9e16099c4dc8/fmed-12-1497776-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/714298327223/fmed-12-1497776-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/1502c70fab45/fmed-12-1497776-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/71a305cdf360/fmed-12-1497776-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/2e17af4f75e1/fmed-12-1497776-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/86448c8fe423/fmed-12-1497776-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/309697a42c68/fmed-12-1497776-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/ffc23aa21cf1/fmed-12-1497776-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/9e16099c4dc8/fmed-12-1497776-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/714298327223/fmed-12-1497776-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/1502c70fab45/fmed-12-1497776-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/71a305cdf360/fmed-12-1497776-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/2e17af4f75e1/fmed-12-1497776-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ca/12078321/86448c8fe423/fmed-12-1497776-g0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Macular pucker and cataract treated with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation combined with small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: a comparison of outcomes with and without femtosecond laser assistance.采用超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体植入术并联合小切口玻璃体切除术治疗黄斑皱襞和白内障:飞秒激光辅助与非飞秒激光辅助的疗效比较
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 1;12:1497776. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1497776. eCollection 2025.
2
Combined 23-gauge vitrectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.23G玻璃体切除术联合飞秒激光辅助白内障手术
Ophthalmic Res. 2014;52(3):141-6. doi: 10.1159/000367716. Epub 2014 Oct 4.
3
Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery for cataracts after pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术治疗玻璃体切割术后白内障的效果:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03871-w.
4
SURGICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH MACULAR PUCKER AND GOOD PREOPERATIVE VISUAL ACUITY AFTER VITRECTOMY WITH MEMBRANE PEELING.玻璃体切除联合膜剥除术后黄斑皱襞且术前视力良好患者的手术结果
Retina. 2015 Sep;35(9):1817-21. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000558.
5
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification: the FACT non-inferiority RCT.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与超声乳化白内障吸除术的比较:FACT 非劣效性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jan;25(6):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta25060.
6
Corneal endothelial cell loss after pars plana vitrectomy and combined phacoemulsification-vitrectomy surgeries.平坦部玻璃体切除术及白内障超声乳化吸除联合玻璃体切除术术后的角膜内皮细胞丢失
Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;52(1):4-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
7
Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole.玻切联合内界膜瓣翻转术与常规玻切联合内界膜剥除术治疗大孔性黄斑裂孔的对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 7;8(8):CD015031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015031.pub2.
8
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract in vitreoretinal surgery.玻璃体视网膜手术中的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 30;27(5):565-568. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000986. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
9
Prospective Comparison of Intraocular Lens Dynamics and Refractive Error between Phacovitrectomy and Phacoemulsification Alone.玻璃体切割联合白内障超声乳化术与单纯白内障超声乳化术人工晶状体动力学及屈光不正的前瞻性比较
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Jul;4(7):700-707. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.01.022. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
Comparison of postoperative refractive outcome in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy vs cataract surgery following vitrectomy.比较玻璃体切割术后白内障超声乳化吸除联合前段玻璃体切除术与单纯白内障超声乳化吸除术后的屈光效果。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 May;258(5):987-993. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04583-w. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification in vitrectomized eyes - A prospective interventional study.玻璃体切割术后的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术的临床疗效比较-一项前瞻性干预研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 1;72(9):1285-1290. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1804_23. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Racial Disparities in Cataract Surgery Timeline and Intraocular Lens Selection: A Retrospective Study.种族差异对白内障手术时间和人工晶状体选择的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Nov 1;12(11):20. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.11.20.
3
Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery Versus Femtosecond Laser Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Cumulative Dissipated Energy and Corneal Endothelial Loss in Cataract Patients.
传统超声乳化手术与飞秒激光超声乳化手术:白内障患者累积消散能量与角膜内皮损失的比较分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 19;17:1709-1716. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S408717. eCollection 2023.
4
Cost Utility and Value of Information Analysis of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的成本效用和信息价值分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul 1;141(7):625-629. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.1716.
5
Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification on corneal impact: A meta-analysis and systematic review.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术对角膜影响的比较:Meta 分析和系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0284181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284181. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparative study of FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification for complex cataracts in vitrectomized eyes.FLACS与传统超声乳化术治疗玻璃体切除术后复杂白内障的对比研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Dec 1;48(12):1381-1387. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000998.
7
Role of Cold Balanced Salt Solution (BSS) in the Prophylaxis of Cystoid Macular Edema After Cataract Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study.冷平衡盐溶液(BSS)在白内障手术后预防黄斑囊样水肿中的作用:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 17;15:2519-2526. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S304146. eCollection 2021.
8
"Chopper Shield" Technique to Protect Corneal Endothelium During Phacoemulsification Surgery for Rock Hard Cataracts.在硬核白内障超声乳化手术中保护角膜内皮的“斩波器护盾”技术
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 May 24;15:2161-2165. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S308750. eCollection 2021.
9
The cold eye irrigation BSS solution used during phacoemulsification reduces post-surgery patients discomfort preventing the inflammation.白内障超声乳化手术中使用的冷眼灌注平衡盐溶液可减轻术后患者的不适,预防炎症。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 May 20:11206721211018377. doi: 10.1177/11206721211018377.
10
PHACOVITRECTOMY VERSUS LENS-SPARING VITRECTOMY FOR RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR ACCORDING TO THE SURGICAL EXPERIENCE.根据手术经验,裂孔源性视网膜脱离修复时行玻切术与晶状体保留性玻切术的比较。
Retina. 2021 Aug 1;41(8):1597-1604. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003090.