• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统超声乳化手术与飞秒激光超声乳化手术:白内障患者累积消散能量与角膜内皮损失的比较分析

Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery Versus Femtosecond Laser Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Cumulative Dissipated Energy and Corneal Endothelial Loss in Cataract Patients.

作者信息

Léda Rayssa Medeiros, Machado Daniela Cristina Schroff, Hida Wilson Takashi, Motta Antônio Francisco Pimenta, Pacini Thiago de Faria, Amorim Rivadavio Fernandes

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brazil.

Department of Ophthalmology, Luz Hospital de Olhos e Laser, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 19;17:1709-1716. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S408717. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S408717
PMID:37361689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10289298/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze whether femtosecond laser-assisted surgery leads to less cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and decreased endothelial cell loss compared to conventional surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This non-blinded, non-randomized, quasi-experimental clinical trial was conducted at one center and involved one surgeon. Patients with cataracts and 50-80 years old were included, and the exclusion criteria were radial keratotomy, trabeculectomy, drain tube implant, corneal transplant, posterior vitrectomy, and re-implantation of intraocular lens. In total, 298 patients were recruited between October 2020 and April 2021, and the data collected included sex, laterality, age, ocular comorbidities, systemic comorbidities and CDE. An endothelial cell count was performed before and after surgery. Patients were divided according to femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification or conventional phacoemulsification. The femtolaser patients were submitted to the equipment, and then, immediately after treatment, phacoemulsification surgery was performed. In the conventional method, the "divide and conquer" technique was used. The statistical analysis was made using an analysis of covariance linear model, using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., 1999). Values with p < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were analyzed. The only statistically relevant predictors of CDE were the severity of the cataract (p < 0.0001) and age of ≥75 years (p = 0.0003). The following factors were not significant: technique with or without laser (p = 0.6862), sex (p = 0.8897), systemic arterial hypertension (p = 0.1658), and diabetes (p = 0.9017). Grade 4 cataracts were associated with higher CDE than grade 3 cataracts, which in turn were associated with higher CDE than grade 2 cataracts. A comparison of pre- and post-operative specular microscopy with and without laser revealed no significant discrepancy (p = 0.5017).

CONCLUSION

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery did not reduce CDE or endothelial cell loss compared to conventional surgery regardless of severity.

摘要

目的

分析与传统手术相比,飞秒激光辅助手术是否会导致更少的累积消散能量(CDE)和更低的内皮细胞损失。

患者与方法

本非盲、非随机、准实验性临床试验在一个中心进行,由一名外科医生操作。纳入年龄在50至80岁的白内障患者,排除标准为放射状角膜切开术、小梁切除术、引流管植入、角膜移植、玻璃体后段切除术和人工晶状体再植入。2020年10月至2021年4月期间共招募了298例患者,收集的数据包括性别、患侧、年龄、眼部合并症、全身合并症和CDE。手术前后进行内皮细胞计数。患者根据飞秒激光辅助超声乳化术或传统超声乳化术进行分组。接受飞秒激光治疗的患者先使用设备,然后在治疗后立即进行超声乳化手术。传统方法采用“分而治之”技术。使用SAS 9.4版(SAS Institute, Inc., 1999)的协方差线性模型进行统计分析。p < 0.05的值被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共分析了132例患者。CDE的唯一具有统计学相关性的预测因素是白内障的严重程度(p < 0.0001)和年龄≥75岁(p = 0.0003)。以下因素不具有统计学意义:是否使用激光技术(p = 0.6862)、性别(p = 0.8897)、系统性动脉高血压(p = 0.1658)和糖尿病(p = 0.9017)。4级白内障比3级白内障的CDE更高,而3级白内障又比2级白内障的CDE更高。有激光和无激光情况下手术前后镜面显微镜检查的比较显示无显著差异(p = 0.5017)。

结论

与传统手术相比,无论严重程度如何,飞秒激光辅助白内障手术均未减少CDE或内皮细胞损失。

相似文献

1
Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery Versus Femtosecond Laser Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Cumulative Dissipated Energy and Corneal Endothelial Loss in Cataract Patients.传统超声乳化手术与飞秒激光超声乳化手术:白内障患者累积消散能量与角膜内皮损失的比较分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 19;17:1709-1716. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S408717. eCollection 2023.
2
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: Long-term outcomes.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术治疗 Fuchs 内皮角膜营养不良:长期疗效观察。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Jul;44(7):864-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
3
[Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification on corneal endothelium and prognosis of diabetic patients with cataract with different nuclear hardness].飞秒激光辅助超声乳化术对不同核硬度糖尿病白内障患者角膜内皮及预后的影响
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 11;60(6):511-517. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20231223-00305.
4
Predictors of intraocular pressure reduction after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery: a prospective trial.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术降低眼压的预测因素:一项前瞻性试验。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan;43(1):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02427-x. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
5
Comparison of Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss Between Two Femtosecond Laser Platforms and Standard Phacoemulsification.两种飞秒激光平台与标准超声乳化术之间角膜内皮细胞丢失的比较
J Refract Surg. 2017 Oct 1;33(10):708-712. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170731-01.
6
Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification.飞秒激光辅助与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术临床疗效的比较。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2018 Apr 23;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s40662-018-0102-5. eCollection 2018.
7
Comparison of real-world treatment outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and phacoemulsification cataract surgery: A retrospective, observational study from an outpatient clinic in France.法国一家门诊的回顾性观察研究:比较飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与超声乳化白内障手术的真实世界治疗结局。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;31(4):1809-1816. doi: 10.1177/1120672120925766. Epub 2020 May 26.
8
Comparison of endothelial cell loss in diabetic patients after conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.比较常规超声乳化白内障吸除术和飞秒激光辅助白内障手术对糖尿病患者内皮细胞丢失的影响。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02923-3.
9
Comparison of ultrasound energy consumption between low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients with different cataract densities.不同白内障密度患者中低能量飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障手术的超声能量消耗比较
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023 May;33(3):1373-1379. doi: 10.1177/11206721221147952. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
10
Differences in energy expenditure for conventional and femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery using 2 different phacoemulsification systems.使用两种不同超声乳化系统的传统白内障手术和飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的能量消耗差异。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.11.037.

引用本文的文献

1
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss Following Cataract Surgery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Review.2型糖尿病患者白内障手术后的角膜内皮细胞丢失:一项综述
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 15;13(7):1726. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071726.
2
Macular pucker and cataract treated with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation combined with small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: a comparison of outcomes with and without femtosecond laser assistance.采用超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体植入术并联合小切口玻璃体切除术治疗黄斑皱襞和白内障:飞秒激光辅助与非飞秒激光辅助的疗效比较
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 1;12:1497776. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1497776. eCollection 2025.
3
Management and challenges of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in patients with cataracts secondary to reverse-implanted posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens: a case report.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术治疗后房型有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入术后继发性白内障患者的管理与挑战:一例报告
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04055-2.
4
Comparison of Phacoemulsification and Aspiration Parameters in Cataract Surgery: Metal Tip vs. Hybrid Tip.白内障手术中超声乳化和抽吸参数的比较:金属探头与混合探头。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Nov 26;11(12):1195. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11121195.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors impacting cumulative dissipated energy levels and postoperative visual acuity outcome in cataract surgery.影响白内障手术累积耗散能量水平和术后视力结果的因素。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02205-w.
2
Comparison of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted and Ultrasound-Assisted Cataract Surgery with Focus on Endothelial Analysis.飞秒激光辅助与超声乳化白内障手术的比较:着眼于内皮细胞分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 2;21(3):996. doi: 10.3390/s21030996.
3
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in eyes with shallow anterior chamber depth: comparison with conventional phacoemulsification.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术在浅前房深度眼中的应用:与传统超声乳化术的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Dec;46(12):1604-1610. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000341.
4
Femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery (FEMCAT): a multicentre participant-masked randomised superiority and cost-effectiveness trial.飞秒激光辅助白内障超声乳化手术(FEMCAT):一项多中心、参与者设盲、随机优效性和成本效益试验。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):212-224. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32481-X.
5
Impact of lens density and lens thickness on cumulative dissipated energy in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.影响飞秒激光辅助白内障手术中累积耗散能量的晶状体密度和晶状体厚度。
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Aug;34(6):1229-1234. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02715-6. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
6
Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification.飞秒激光辅助与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术临床疗效的比较。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2018 Apr 23;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s40662-018-0102-5. eCollection 2018.
7
Evaluation of a hub-and-spoke model for the delivery of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery within the context of a large randomised controlled trial.评价在一项大型随机对照试验背景下实施飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的辐辏式模式。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;102(11):1556-1563. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311319. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
8
Outcomes study between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification surgery using an active fluidics system.使用主动流体系统的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障手术的疗效研究。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 25;11:1735-1739. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S136136. eCollection 2017.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Compared with Manual Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of 14 567 Eyes.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与手动白内障手术的疗效和安全性比较:14567 只眼的荟萃分析。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Oct;123(10):2113-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
10
The economics of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的经济学
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;27(1):76-81. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000219.