• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining Contemporary Human Dignity: How Human Rights Evolve and Reshape Health Justice.审视当代人的尊严:人权如何演变并重塑健康正义。
Cureus. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):e82316. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82316. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Tuberculosis结核病
3
New constitutionalism and the social reproduction of caring institutions.新宪政主义与关怀机构的社会再生产
Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(1):35-57. doi: 10.1007/s11017-005-5756-z.
4
International obligations through collective rights: Moving from foreign health assistance to global health governance.通过集体权利承担国际义务:从对外卫生援助走向全球卫生治理。
Health Hum Rights. 2010 Jun 15;12(1):61-72.
5
Global Health and Peace: The Elusive Path with a Focus on Palestine, Ukraine, and Venezuela.全球健康与和平:以巴勒斯坦、乌克兰和委内瑞拉为重点的艰难之路。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Dec 14;17:3161-3169. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S483791. eCollection 2024.
6
Global constitutionalism, responsibility to protect, and extra-territorial obligations to realize the right to health: time to overcome the double standard (once again).全球宪政、保护责任与实现健康权的域外义务:是时候(再次)克服双重标准了。
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Oct 10;13:68. doi: 10.1186/s12939-014-0068-4.
7
Reflections on Health and Human Rights.关于健康与人权的思考。
J Law Med Ethics. 2025;53(S1):16-17. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.23. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
8
Human Rights and the Political Economy of Universal Health Care: Designing Equitable Financing.人权与全民医疗保健的政治经济学:设计公平筹资方式
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):67-78.
9
Women holding hands.女性牵手。
People Planet. 1995;4(3):6-7.
10
Imagining Global Health with Justice: In Defense of the Right to Health.以正义视角构想全球健康:捍卫健康权
Health Care Anal. 2015 Dec;23(4):308-29. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0307-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Will there be a future for newborns in Gaza?加沙地带的新生儿还有未来吗?
Lancet. 2024 Nov 2;404(10464):1725-1726. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02249-9. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Towards a bidirectional decoloniality in academic global health: insights from settler colonialism and racial capitalism.迈向学术全球健康的双向去殖民化:从定居殖民主义和种族资本主义中得到的启示。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Sep;11(9):e1469-e1474. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00307-8.
3
Respecting, protecting and fulfilling the human right to health.尊重、保护和实现健康权。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Mar 15;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01634-3.
4
Political economy of covid-19: extractive, regressive, competitive.新冠疫情的政治经济学:掠夺性的、倒退的、竞争性的。
BMJ. 2021 Jan 22;372:n73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n73.

审视当代人的尊严:人权如何演变并重塑健康正义。

Examining Contemporary Human Dignity: How Human Rights Evolve and Reshape Health Justice.

作者信息

Irfan Bilal, Jaber Batool, Awwad Maisa, AlSourani Tareq, Abu Shammala Abdallah

机构信息

Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):e82316. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82316. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.82316
PMID:40376355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12080955/
Abstract

Human rights did not emerge in a political or cultural vacuum; their origins in 20th-century legal frameworks and postcolonial power asymmetries continue to shape evolving notions of dignity and justice. Central to this evolution is the tension between civil and political rights, understood as immediately enforceable, and economic, social, and cultural rights, which are too often neglected or treated as merely aspirational. Securing health as a right requires both negative and positive state obligations, challenging simplistic divisions between public and private spheres and exposing how gendered, racialized, and class-based violence often remains hidden within private realms. Colonial legacies, neoliberal market forces, and structural inequalities further reinforce injustice by rendering marginalized groups undeserving of care. Grassroots movements, from AIDS activists to Indigenous women's campaigns, demonstrate the capacity of collective action to transform law, policy, and social norms. A rights-based approach to health financing demands that societies treat healthcare as a public good and moral commitment rather than as a commodity. At the global level, target-driven frameworks like the Millennium Development Goals have achieved discrete gains but often fail to address the systemic drivers of inequity. Ongoing armed conflicts reveal how militarized violence decimates health infrastructure and entrenches disparities for generations. True health equity and democracy, therefore, require robust institutions, transparent governance, and inclusive participation, all underpinned by the recognition that rights are shaped and reshaped by lived struggles. Only through this holistic lens, one that integrates civil, political, economic, social, and cultural dimensions, can efforts to realize the promise of universal human dignity be brought into practice.

摘要

人权并非在政治或文化真空中出现;其在20世纪法律框架和后殖民权力不对称中的起源,继续塑造着不断演变的尊严和正义观念。这一演变的核心是公民权利和政治权利(被理解为可立即执行)与经济、社会和文化权利之间的紧张关系,后者常常被忽视或仅仅被视为一种愿望。将健康作为一项权利加以保障,既需要国家的消极义务,也需要积极义务,这挑战了公共领域和私人领域之间简单化的划分,并揭示了基于性别、种族和阶级的暴力如何常常隐藏在私人领域之中。殖民遗产、新自由主义市场力量和结构性不平等通过使边缘化群体不值得获得照料,进一步加剧了不公正。从艾滋病活动家到原住民妇女运动等基层运动,展示了集体行动改变法律、政策和社会规范的能力。基于权利的卫生筹资方法要求社会将医疗保健视为一种公共利益和道德承诺,而不是一种商品。在全球层面,像千年发展目标这样的目标驱动框架取得了一些具体成果,但往往未能解决不平等的系统性驱动因素。持续的武装冲突揭示了军事化暴力如何摧毁卫生基础设施,并使几代人的差距根深蒂固。因此,真正的卫生公平和民主需要强大的机构、透明的治理和包容性的参与,所有这些都基于这样一种认识,即权利是由实际斗争塑造和重塑的。只有通过这种整合了公民、政治、经济、社会和文化层面的整体视角,才能将实现普遍人类尊严承诺的努力付诸实践。