Vijayakumar Shilpa, Corneau Emily, Erqou Sebhat, Kokkirala Aravind, Wu Wen-Chih
Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Cardiovascular Division and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Center of Innovation, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0323308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323308. eCollection 2025.
The mortality risk associated with loss of in-person outpatient visits or transition to virtual care in patients with heart failure (HF) during the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown.
Assess changes in outpatient HF care patterns and associated mortality.
Retrospective analysis of HF patients using national Veterans-Health-Administration (VHA) data. Among 509,511 HF patients who received VHA care, we compared mean monthly days-with-an-outpatient-visit from 2/2018-1/2020 (pre-COVID) versus 2/2020-1/2021 (COVID) using T-tests. In a subset of 321,439 patients with ≥1 VHA cardiology or primary-care visit in 2019, we related the presence and type of outpatient visit with mortality using Cox-Regression estimated hazard-ratios (HRs).
Despite a 2-3-fold increase in video-only visits and use of telephone visits to maintain access, the overall days with outpatient visits decreased from a monthly-average of 81.4 ± 6.1 in 2018-2019 and 81.0 ± 5.6 in 2019-2020, to 57.8 ± 11 days in 2020-2021 (P < 0.01 for both), per 100 Veterans. When compared to patients with no-visits during the study period, the adjusted-mortality risk was lowest for patients with at least one in-person (HR 0.42, 95%CI: 0.41-0.44), followed by video-only (HR 0.52, 95%CI: 0.50-0.55) and then telephone-only (HR 0.57, 95%CI: 0.54-0.60) visits (p = 0.14 for trend). Results remained similar when the analysis was repeated (without including telephone visits) for pre-COVID (2/2018-1/2020) periods.
Despite an increase in video and use of telephone visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was still a decrease in total outpatient visits for patients with HF. The presence and type of outpatient encounter was associated with the adjusted risk of mortality.
在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,心力衰竭(HF)患者门诊面对面就诊减少或转为虚拟护理与死亡风险之间的关系尚不清楚。
评估门诊HF护理模式的变化及相关死亡率。
利用美国退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的全国数据对HF患者进行回顾性分析。在接受VHA护理的509,511例HF患者中,我们使用t检验比较了2018年2月至2020年1月(COVID-19之前)与2020年2月至2021年1月(COVID-19期间)每月门诊就诊天数的平均值。在2019年至少有1次VHA心脏病学或初级保健就诊的321,439例患者亚组中,我们使用Cox回归估计风险比(HR)将门诊就诊的存在和类型与死亡率相关联。
尽管仅视频就诊和使用电话就诊以维持就诊机会增加了2至3倍,但门诊就诊总天数从2018 - 2019年的每月平均81.4±6.1天和2019 - 2020年的81.0±5.6天降至2020 - 2021年的57.8±11天(每100名退伍军人,两者P均<0.01)。与研究期间无就诊的患者相比,至少有一次面对面就诊的患者调整后死亡风险最低(HR 0.42,95%CI:0.41 - 0.44),其次是仅视频就诊(HR 0.52,95%CI:0.50 - 0.55),然后是仅电话就诊(HR 0.57,95%CI:0.54 - 0.60)(趋势p = 0.14)。在对COVID-19之前(2018年2月至2020年1月)期间重复分析(不包括电话就诊)时,结果仍然相似。
尽管在COVID-19大流行期间视频就诊和电话就诊有所增加,但HF患者的门诊就诊总数仍有所下降。门诊就诊的存在和类型与调整后的死亡风险相关。