Wang Junyi, Yu Yafu, Xu Lang, Xie Xinyan, Liu Xiaochang, Zhou Juan, Cheng Guirong, Hu Feifei, Liu Dan, Huang Linya, Han Gangbin, Li Shiyue, Song Dan, Liu Jing, Nie Qianqian, Cai Cheng, Cui Yuyang, Tan Wei, Zeng Yan
Geriatric Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, West Huangjiahu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Brain Science and Advanced Technology Institute, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, West Huangjiahu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, 430065, China.
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 16;25(1):1809. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22596-5.
There is still a lack of evidence examining the association of behavioral and social factors with frailty transitions and mortality. We investigated whether social isolation is associated with different progressions and outcomes of frailty among community-dwelling older adults.
This community-based cohort study assessed the frailty index and objective social isolation of 31,168 participants (58.3% female; average age: 88.1 ± 11.1 years) from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) from 1998 to 2018. Four Markov state-transition models were constructed to examine the associations between social isolation and the seven transitions of the frailty trajectory.
According to the Markov state-transition model, for every one-point increase in the social isolation score of non-frail participants, the risk of developing prefrailty increased by 4.2% [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.042, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.007-1.079], whereas for prefrail participants, the risk of developing frailty and death increased by 3.9% (HR = 1.039, 95% CI: 1.007-1.073) and 16.1% (HR = 1.161, 95% CI: 1.099-1.226), respectively. For each increase in the social isolation score in the frail population, the risk of death increased by 2.9% (HR = 1.029, 95% CI: 1.004-1.054). Socially isolated persons had a greater cumulative transition probability to prefrailty and frailty. Socially isolated women were more likely to experience prefrailty and frailty than socially isolated men, whereas the latter were more likely to die from prefrailty and frailty than the former.
This study indicates that social isolation may contribute to an increased risk of both the incidence and progression of frailty, elevating deterioration risks in initially non-frail and prefrail populations, while primarily exacerbating mortality risks in those already experiencing prefrailty or frailty.
目前仍缺乏证据来检验行为和社会因素与衰弱转变及死亡率之间的关联。我们调查了社会孤立是否与社区居住的老年人衰弱的不同进展及结局相关。
这项基于社区的队列研究评估了来自中国健康与养老追踪调查(CLHLS)1998年至2018年的31168名参与者(女性占58.3%;平均年龄:88.1±11.1岁)的衰弱指数和客观社会孤立情况。构建了四个马尔可夫状态转移模型来检验社会孤立与衰弱轨迹的七个转变之间的关联。
根据马尔可夫状态转移模型,非衰弱参与者的社会孤立得分每增加1分,发展为轻度衰弱的风险增加4.2%[风险比(HR)=1.042,95%置信区间(CI):1.007 - 1.079],而对于轻度衰弱参与者,发展为衰弱和死亡的风险分别增加3.9%(HR = 1.039,95%CI:1.007 - 1.073)和16.1%(HR = 1.161,95%CI:1.099 - 1.226)。衰弱人群的社会孤立得分每增加1分,死亡风险增加2.9%(HR = 1.029,95%CI:1.004 - 1.054)。社会孤立的人向轻度衰弱和衰弱转变的累积概率更高。社会孤立的女性比社会孤立的男性更易发展为轻度衰弱和衰弱,而后者比前者更易死于轻度衰弱和衰弱。
本研究表明,社会孤立可能导致衰弱发生率和进展风险增加,在初始非衰弱和轻度衰弱人群中提升恶化风险,而在已经处于轻度衰弱或衰弱状态的人群中主要加剧死亡风险。