Coppens Alexandre, Aissi James Sarah, Roze Hadrien, Juvin Charles, Repusseau Benjamin, Lebreton Guillaume, Luyt Charles-Edouard, Hékimian Guillaume, Chommeloux Juliette, Pineton de Chambrun Marc, Combes Alain, Franchineau Guillaume, Schmidt Matthieu
UMRS_1166-ICAN, Service de Medecine Intensive Reanimation, iCAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, INSERM, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Universités, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Medical Intensive Care Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Crit Care. 2025 May 16;29(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05437-0.
The significance of the Recruitment to Inflation (R/I) ratio in identifying PEEP recruiters in patients undergoing ultra-protective lung ventilation during venovenous ECMO is not well established.
To compare the concordance of the R/I ratio and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) in determining optimum PEEP settings in severe ARDS patients on ECMO and ventilated with very low tidal volumes.
Initially, a low-flow insufflation was performed to detect and measure the airway opening pressure (AOP). Subsequently, the R/I ratio was calculated from PEEP 15-5 cmHO, followed by a decremental PEEP trial (20-6 cmHO in 2 cmHO steps) monitored by EIT. The optimum EIT-based PEEP was defined as the intersection of the collapse and overdistension curves.
Among 54 ECMO patients (tidal volume: 4.8 [3.0-6.0] mL/kg), 13 (24%) exhibited an airway opening pressure (AOP) of 11 (8-14) cmHO. The cohort's median R/I ratio was 0.43 (0.28-0.61). A tertile-based analysis of the R/I ratio (≤ 0.34; 0.34-0.54; > 0.54) revealed median optimum EIT-based PEEP of 8 [8-10], 10 [8-14], and 14 [12-16] cmHO, respectively. The R/I ratio demonstrated weak inverse correlations with lung overdistension (R = 0.19) and positive correlations with lung collapse (R = 0.26) measured by EIT (p < 0.01).
The R/I ratio is feasible during ultra-protective ventilation and provides valuable indications for guiding PEEP titration. Specifically, an R/I ratio > 0.34 may help identify patients likely to benefit from further individualized PEEP optimization using EIT. In contrast, when the R/I ratio is ≤ 0.34, a moderate PEEP level (8-10 cmH₂O) may suffice.
在静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(venovenous ECMO)期间进行超保护性肺通气的患者中,募集与膨胀(R/I)比值在识别可复张肺区域方面的意义尚未明确。
比较R/I比值与电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)在确定接受ECMO且采用低潮气量通气的重症急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者最佳呼气末正压(PEEP)设置时的一致性。
首先,进行低流量充气以检测和测量气道开口压力(AOP)。随后,从PEEP 15至5 cmH₂O计算R/I比值,接着进行由EIT监测的递减PEEP试验(从20至6 cmH₂O,每次递减2 cmH₂O)。基于EIT的最佳PEEP定义为肺萎陷和过度膨胀曲线的交点。
在54例接受ECMO的患者中(潮气量:4.8 [3.0 - 6.0] mL/kg),13例(24%)的气道开口压力(AOP)为11(8 - 14)cmH₂O。该队列的R/I比值中位数为0.43(0.28 - 0.61)。基于三分位数对R/I比值进行分析(≤ 0.34;0.34 - 0.54;> 0.54),结果显示基于EIT的最佳PEEP中位数分别为8 [8 - 10]、10 [8 - 14]和14 [12 - 16] cmH₂O。R/I比值与EIT测量的肺过度膨胀呈弱负相关(R = 0.19),与肺萎陷呈正相关(R = 0.26)(p < 0.01)。
在超保护性通气期间,R/I比值是可行的,可为指导PEEP滴定提供有价值的指标。具体而言,R/I比值> 0.34可能有助于识别可能从使用EIT进行进一步个体化PEEP优化中获益的患者。相反,当R/I比值≤ 0.34时,中等水平的PEEP(8 - 10 cmH₂O)可能就足够了。