Heines S J H, de Jongh S A M, de Jongh F H C, Segers R P J, Gilissen K M H, van der Horst I C C, van Bussel B C T, Bergmans D C J J
Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202, AZ, The Netherlands.
Department of Pulmonology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Feb;39(1):127-139. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01212-8. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
There is no universally accepted method for positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration approach for patients on spontaneous mechanical ventilation (SMV). Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) guided PEEP-titration has shown promising results in controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), current implemented algorithm for PEEP titration (based on regional compliance measurements) is not applicable in SMV. Regional peak flow (RPF, defined as the highest inspiratory flow rate based on EIT at a certain PEEP level) is a new method for quantifying regional lung mechanics designed for SMV. The objective is to study whether RPF by EIT is a feasible method for PEEP titration during SMV. Single EIT measurements were performed in COVID-19 ARDS patients on SMV. Clinical (i.e., tidal volume, airway occlusion pressure, end-tidal CO) and mechanical (cyclic alveolar recruitment, recruitment, cumulative overdistension (OD), cumulative collapse (CL), pendelluft, and PEEP) outcomes were determined by EIT at several pre-defined PEEP thresholds (1-10% CL and the intersection of the OD and CL curves) and outcomes at all thresholds were compared to the outcomes at baseline PEEP. In total, 25 patients were included. No significant and clinically relevant differences were found between thresholds for tidal volume, end-tidal CO, and P0.1 compared to baseline PEEP; cyclic alveolar recruitment rates changed by -3.9% to -37.9% across thresholds; recruitment rates ranged from - 49.4% to + 79.2%; cumulative overdistension changed from - 75.9% to + 373.4% across thresholds; cumulative collapse changed from 0% to -94.3%; PEEP levels from 10 up to 14 cmHO were observed across thresholds compared to baseline PEEP of 10 cmHO. A threshold of approximately 5% cumulative collapse yields the optimum compromise between all clinical and mechanical outcomes. EIT-guided PEEP titration by the RPF approach is feasible and is linked to improved overall lung mechanics) during SMV using a threshold of approximately 5% CL. However, the long-term clinical safety and effect of this approach remain to be determined.
对于接受自主机械通气(SMV)的患者,目前尚无普遍接受的呼气末正压(PEEP)滴定方法。电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)引导的PEEP滴定在控制机械通气(CMV)中已显示出有前景的结果,但目前实施的基于区域顺应性测量的PEEP滴定算法不适用于SMV。区域峰值流速(RPF,定义为在特定PEEP水平下基于EIT的最高吸气流速)是一种为SMV设计的量化区域肺力学的新方法。目的是研究通过EIT测量的RPF是否是SMV期间PEEP滴定的可行方法。对接受SMV的新冠肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者进行了单次EIT测量。在几个预先定义的PEEP阈值(1-10%肺萎陷(CL)以及过度扩张(OD)和CL曲线的交点)下,通过EIT确定临床指标(即潮气量、气道闭塞压、呼气末二氧化碳)和机械指标(周期性肺泡复张、复张、累积过度扩张(OD)、累积萎陷(CL)、摆动通气和PEEP),并将所有阈值下的结果与基线PEEP时的结果进行比较。总共纳入了25例患者。与基线PEEP相比,潮气量、呼气末二氧化碳和气道闭塞压在各阈值之间未发现显著的临床相关差异;跨阈值时,周期性肺泡复张率变化范围为-3.9%至-37.9%;复张率范围为-49.4%至+79.2%;跨阈值时,累积过度扩张从-75.9%变化至+373.4%;累积萎陷从0%变化至-94.3%;与基线PEEP 10 cmH₂O相比,各阈值下观察到的PEEP水平为10至14 cmH₂O。约5%累积萎陷的阈值在所有临床和机械指标之间产生了最佳折衷。在SMV期间,使用约5%CL的阈值,通过RPF方法进行EIT引导的PEEP滴定是可行的,并且与改善整体肺力学相关。然而,这种方法的长期临床安全性和效果仍有待确定。