Hamed Mohamed A, Zahran Ibrahim S, Samy Alaa, Fayad Eman, Katouah Hanadi A, Farrag Foad, Abumandour Mohamed M A, Sobhy Adel, Elolimy Ahmed A, Okene Ibrahim A, Shukry Mustafa, Elgioushy Magdy
Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
BMC Vet Res. 2025 May 17;21(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04706-y.
In this study, the pain-relieving and calming effects of giving romifidine and xylazine through an epidural in camels were compared. Twenty-one adult camels (9 non-pregnant females and 12 intact males) weighing between 400-450 kg were randomly divided into three equal groups. Each group received one of the following treatments: an equal volume of sterile saline, 0.17 mg/kg of xylazine, or 50 g/kg of romifidine. All of the treatments were put directly into the sacrococcygeal space after being diluted in 0.9% sterile saline solution until the final volume was 20 ml. Before treatment and then at 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min after administration, the perineal analgesia, sedation, and degree of ataxia were evaluated. At these same times, rectal temperature (RT), heart rate (HR), and respiration rate (RR) were simultaneously measured. Epidural administration of romifidine and xylazine resulted in varying degrees of sedation, ranging from mild to deep, alongside complete antinociception affecting the perineum, inguinal area, and flank. This effect extended distally to the coronary band of the hind limbs and cranially to the thoracic region. After romifidine, analgesia started more quickly than with xylazine (6 ± 1.05 vs. 14.17 ± 0.83). The duration of both antinociceptive for romifidine was substantially longer than that of xylazine (159 ± 6.38 vs. 63.33 ± 2.47). The onset time of sedation was substantially shorter after romifidine (6.8 ± 0.83 min) compared to xylazine (10.8 ± 0.83 min). Romifidine's sedative effect lasted longer than xylazine's (149.17 ± 4.16 vs. 108.33 ± 1.05 min). At every study measurement point, the romifidine and xylazine-treated groups showed negligible RT, HR, and RR changes. Conclusion: Romifidine or xylazine may be a reliable, durable, and economical method for epidural anesthesia in camels undergoing standing surgery, as romifidine has a faster onset and longer antinociceptive effect. Therefore, epidural romifidine could be a more effective treatment option for immediate postoperative pain.
在本研究中,比较了通过硬膜外腔给予骆驼罗米芬定和赛拉嗪的止痛和平静效果。21头体重在400 - 450千克之间的成年骆驼(9头未怀孕雌性和12头未阉割雄性)被随机分成三组,每组接受以下治疗之一:等体积的无菌生理盐水、0.17毫克/千克赛拉嗪或50微克/千克罗米芬定。所有治疗药物在0.9%无菌盐溶液中稀释至最终体积为20毫升后直接注入骶尾间隙。在治疗前以及给药后5、10、15、30、60、90、120、150和180分钟,评估会阴镇痛、镇静和共济失调程度。在相同时间,同时测量直肠温度(RT)、心率(HR)和呼吸频率(RR)。硬膜外给予罗米芬定和赛拉嗪会导致不同程度的镇静,从轻度到深度,同时伴有影响会阴、腹股沟区和胁腹的完全抗伤害感受。这种作用向远端延伸至后肢的冠状带,向头侧延伸至胸部区域。给予罗米芬定后,镇痛起效比赛拉嗪更快(6±1.05分钟对14.17±0.83分钟)。罗米芬定的抗伤害感受持续时间显著长于赛拉嗪(159±6.38分钟对63.33±2.47分钟)。与赛拉嗪(10.8±0.83分钟)相比,罗米芬定给药后镇静起效时间显著更短(6.8±0.83分钟)。罗米芬定的镇静作用持续时间比赛拉嗪长(149.17±4.16分钟对108.33±1.05分钟)。在每个研究测量点,罗米芬定和赛拉嗪治疗组的直肠温度、心率和呼吸频率变化可忽略不计。结论:罗米芬定或赛拉嗪可能是骆驼站立手术硬膜外麻醉的可靠、持久且经济的方法,因为罗米芬定起效更快且抗伤害感受作用更长。因此,硬膜外注射罗米芬定可能是术后即时疼痛更有效的治疗选择。